Saadi Adel, Maamri Ramdane, Zaïdi Sahnoun


BDI agents are among the most popular models for the development of intelligent agents. The practical reasoning within the most of BDI models and architectures rely, in the best case, on three kinds of attributes: The utility associated with a goal, the cost of a plan and the uncertainty associated with the action’s effects. Based on a richer set of practical reasoning’s attributes, we propose a BDI architecture which aims to provide a step towards more flexible BDI agents.


  1. Beaudoin, L., 1994. Goal processing in autonomous agants. PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham.
  2. Bratman, M. E., Israel, D. J., Pollack, M. E., 1988. Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. Computational intelligence, 4(3), 49-355.
  3. Braubach, L., Pokahr, A., Moltdt, D., Lamersdorf, W., 2004. Goal representation for BDI Agent Systems. In: Proceedings of ProMAS04.
  4. Casali, A., Godo, L., Sierra, C., 2009. g-BDI: A Graded Intensional Agent Model for Practical Reasoning, In: Proceedings of MDAI 2009, 5-20.
  5. Casali, A., Godo, L., Sierra, C., 2005. Graded BDI Models For Agent Architectures. In: Leite, J., Torroni, P. (Eds.), CLIMA V, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence LNAI 3487, 126-143.
  6. Morreale, V., Bonura, S., Francaviglia, G., Centineo, F., Puccio, M., Cossentino, M, 2007. Developing Intentional Systems with the PRACTIONIST Framework. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International conference on Industrial Informatics, 633-638.
  7. Munroe, S. J., Luck, M., d'Inverno, M., 2003. Towards motivated-based decisions for worth goals. In: V. Marik, J., Mueller, Pechoucek (Eds.), Multi-agents systems and applications III, LNAI, 2691, 17-28.
  8. Norman, T. N., Long, D., 1995. Goal creation in motivated agents. In: Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.(Eds.), Intelligent Agents: Theories, Architecture, and Languages, LNAI, 890, 277-290.
  9. Norman, T. N., Long, D., 1995. Alarms: Heuristics for the control of reasoning attention. In: Proceedings of the seventeenth annual conference of the cognitive science society.
  10. Rahwan, A., Amgoud, L., 2006. An Argumentation-based Approach for Practical Reasoning. In: Proceedings of AAMAS'2006, 347-354.
  11. Rao, A., Georgeff, M., 1995. BDI agents: From theory to practice. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS'95), 312-319.
  12. Rao, A., Georgeff, M., 1991. Deliberation and its role in the formation of intentions. In: Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 300-307.
  13. Schut, M., Wooldridge, M., Parsons, S., 2004. The Theory and Practice of IntentionReconsideration. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 16(4), 261-293.
  14. Thangarajah, J., Padgham, L., Winikoff, M., 2003. Detecting and avoiding interference between goals in intelligent agents. In: Proceedings of AAMAS'03, 401-408.
  15. Wooldridge, M., 1999. Intelligent Agents. In: Weiss, G. (Eds), Multiagent Systems. The MIT Press.
  16. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N. R., 1995. Intelligent Agents: Theory and Practice. Knowledge Engineering Review, 10(2), 115-152.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Adel S., Ramdane M. and Sahnoun Z. (2012). TOWARDS MORE FLEXIBLE BDI AGENTS . In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2: ICAART, ISBN 978-989-8425-96-6, pages 136-145. DOI: 10.5220/0003720801360145

in Bibtex Style

author={Saadi Adel and Maamri Ramdane and Zaïdi Sahnoun},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2: ICAART,},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2: ICAART,
SN - 978-989-8425-96-6
AU - Adel S.
AU - Ramdane M.
AU - Sahnoun Z.
PY - 2012
SP - 136
EP - 145
DO - 10.5220/0003720801360145