MEDICAL TERMINOLOGY BROWSERS - How Usable are them for Describing Clinical Archetypes?

Jesús Cáceres Tello, Miguel-Angel Sicilia, Adolfo Muñoz Carrero, Carlos Rodriguez-Solano Nuzzi, Juan-José Sicilia

Abstract

Clinical terminologies are a major concern in medical informatics, as they are key to provide medical systems with higher levels of interoperability. Large terminologies as SNOMED CT are gaining presence in practical applications. In a related but different direction, archetypes or data type templates are becoming widespread as interchange mechanisms for medical information. Archetypes support mapping to terminologies, in a process that is typically done by the experts developing or revising the archetype. It has been argued that terminology browsers are not appropriate for the task of helping clinical experts in the mapping process. This paper reports usability studies on two widely used SNOMED CT browsers when used as tools for mapping archetypes.

References

  1. Arh T. Blazic B. J., (2008). A Case Study of Usability Testing - The SUMI Evaluation Approach of the EducaNext Portal. In Wseas Transactions On Information Science & Applications. Issue 2, Volume 5, p. 175 - 181. ISSN: 1790-0832.
  2. Balbo, S., Steinkrug, J., Lee, L., Scheidt, S., Hullin, C. and Gogler, Janetter, (2008). The Importance of Including Users in Clinical Software Evaluation: What Usability Can Offer in Home Monitoring. In: Grain, Heather (Editor). HIC 2008 Conference: Australia's Health Informatics Conference, August 31 - September 2, 2008 Melbourne Convention Centre
  3. Beale T., (2002). Archetypes: Constraint-based Domain Models for Future-proof Information Systems
  4. Beale, T. and Heard, S., (2007). Anontology-based model of clinical information. MEDINFO 2007: Proceedings of the 12th World Congress on Health (Medical) Informatics: Building Sustainable Health Systems: 760-764.
  5. Borovicka M., Laschitz L. et al., (2010). Chaos or Content: Towards Generic Structuring of Medical Documents by Utilisation of Archetype-Classes, In: Schreier G, Hayn D, Ammenwerth E. (Eds.): eHealth2010 - Health Informatics meets eHealth: Tagungsband eHealth2010 & eHealth Benchmarking 2010, in OCG Books Band 264. Wien: OCG. S. 47-54.
  6. Duo Wei, B. S., Yue Wang, Yehoshua Perl, Junchuan Xu, Michael Halper, and Kent A. Spackman. Complexity Measures to Track the Evolution of a SNOMED Hierarchy. Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Symposium, 2008: 778-782
  7. Elhanan, G., Perl, Y. and Geller, J., (2010) A Survey of Direct Users and Uses of SNOMED CT: 2010 Status AMIA AnnuSympProc. 2010; 2010: 207-211.
  8. Ericsson, K. and Simon, H. A., (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215-251
  9. Ericsson, K and Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol Analysis. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  10. Gilb T. (1987) Principals of Software Engineering Management, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
  11. Harper, B. D. and Norman, K. L., (1993). Improving User Satisfaction: The Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction Version 5.5. Proceedings of the 1st Annual Mid-Atlantic Human Factors Conference, (pp. 224-228), Virginia Beach, VA.
  12. Jaspers, M. W., (2009). Comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: Methodological aspects and empirical evidence, International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(5), pp. 340-353
  13. Kirakowski, J., Corbett, M., (1993). SUMI: The Software Usability Measurement Inventory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 24(3), pp. 210-212.
  14. Lewis, C., (1982). Using the thinking-aloud method in cognitive interface design. IBM Research Report RC 9265, Yorktown Heights, NY, 1982.
  15. Lewis, J. R., (1995): IBM Computer Usability Satisfaction Questionnaires: Psychometric Evaluation and Instructions for Use. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction. 7, 57-78.
  16. Muñoz, A., Somolinos, R., Pascual, M., Fragua, J., González, M., Monteagudo J. L., Hernández, C., (2007). Proof-of -concept Design and Development of an EN13606-based Electronic Health Care Record Service. Journal American Medical Information Association (2007;14:118 -129. DOI 10.1197/jamia. M2058.)
  17. Nielsen J., (1993). Usability Engineering. AP Professional. Boston (MA), USA,
  18. Nielsen, J and Levy, J (1994). Measuring usability: preference vs. performance. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 37, No. 4. (April 1994), pp. 66- 75. doi:10.1145/175276.175282 Key: citeulike: 296786
  19. Nilsson, O. y Olsen, J., (1995). Measuring Consumer Retail Store LEALTADalty. European Advances in Consumer Research, 2, pp. 289-297.
  20. Rogers, J. and Bodenreider, O., (2008) SNOMED CT: Browsing the Browsers. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Knowledge
  21. Shackel, B., (1991). Usability - context, framework, design and evaluation. In Shackel, B. and Richardson, S. (eds.). Human Factors for Informatics Usability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 21-38.
  22. Tullis, T. S. and Stetson, J. N., (2004, June 7-11). A Comparison of Questionnaires for Assessing Website Usability, Usability Professionals Association (UPA) 2004 Conference, Minneapolis, USA.
  23. Van Veenendaal, E., (1998). Questionnaire based usability testing. In Proceeding of European Software Quality Week, Brussels.
  24. Wollersheim D., Sari A., Rahayu W., (2009). Archetypebased electronic health records: a literature review and evaluation of their applicability to health data interoperability and access. HIM J 38: 7-17.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Cáceres Tello J., Sicilia M., Muñoz Carrero A., Rodriguez-Solano Nuzzi C. and Sicilia J. (2012). MEDICAL TERMINOLOGY BROWSERS - How Usable are them for Describing Clinical Archetypes? . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Health Informatics - Volume 1: HEALTHINF, (BIOSTEC 2012) ISBN 978-989-8425-88-1, pages 413-418. DOI: 10.5220/0003789304130418


in Bibtex Style

@conference{healthinf12,
author={Jesús Cáceres Tello and Miguel-Angel Sicilia and Adolfo Muñoz Carrero and Carlos Rodriguez-Solano Nuzzi and Juan-José Sicilia},
title={MEDICAL TERMINOLOGY BROWSERS - How Usable are them for Describing Clinical Archetypes?},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Health Informatics - Volume 1: HEALTHINF, (BIOSTEC 2012)},
year={2012},
pages={413-418},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0003789304130418},
isbn={978-989-8425-88-1},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Health Informatics - Volume 1: HEALTHINF, (BIOSTEC 2012)
TI - MEDICAL TERMINOLOGY BROWSERS - How Usable are them for Describing Clinical Archetypes?
SN - 978-989-8425-88-1
AU - Cáceres Tello J.
AU - Sicilia M.
AU - Muñoz Carrero A.
AU - Rodriguez-Solano Nuzzi C.
AU - Sicilia J.
PY - 2012
SP - 413
EP - 418
DO - 10.5220/0003789304130418