CHANGE VISUALIZATIONS IN BUSINESS PROCESSES - Requirements Analysis

Simone Kriglstein, Stefanie Rinderle-Ma

Abstract

Many business processes are highly dynamic, because process changes result from unplanned events and exceptions which are unforeseen (e.g., demands of customers have changed, new legislature or design errors are detected). The management of the large collections of the different process model versions which evolve over time requires visualization approaches. Visualizations of changes between different process versions are often essential, because processes in combination with change information can become very complex. In this paper we discuss visualization requirements for process changes with the focus to support users to understand changes more easily. The requirements analysis is based on insights which we gained from: (1) literature review to get an overview about different characteristics of changes in process as well as existing visualization approaches and (2) a user survey to identify users’ experiences and expectations in this field. With the proposed requirements we want to support researchers to identify directions for further work in regard to process change visualization.

References

  1. Aguilar-Savén, R. S. (2004). Business process modelling: Review and framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 90(2):129-149.
  2. Albrecht, B., Effinger, P., Held, M., and Kaufmann, M. (2010). An automatic layout algorithm for bpel processes. In Proc. of the 5th International Symposium on Software Visualization, pages 173-182. ACM.
  3. Beck, F., Burch, M., and Diehl, S. (2009). Towards an aesthetic dimensions framework for dynamic graph visualisations. In Proc. of the 13th International Conference Information Visualisation, pages 592-597, Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society.
  4. Betz, S., Eichhorn, D., Hickl, S., Klink, S., Koschmider, A., Li, Y., Oberweis, A., and Trunko, R. (2008). 3d representation of business process models. In Loos, P., Nttgens, M., Turowski, K., and Werth, D., editors, MobIS, LNI, pages 73-87. GI.
  5. Bobrik, R. and Bauer, T. (2007). Towards configurable process visualizations with proviado. In Proc. of the 16th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructures for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE 2007, pages 367-369.
  6. Bobrik, R., Bauer, T., and Reichert, M. (2006). Proviado - personalized and configurable visualizations of business processes. In Proc. of the 7th International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Web Technologies (EC-WEB'06), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 61-71. Springer.
  7. Bobrik, R., Reichert, M., and Bauer, T. (2007). View-based process visualization. In Proc. of the 5th International Conference on Business Process Management, pages 88-95. Springer.
  8. Brown, R. A. (2010). Conceptual modelling in 3d virtual worlds for process communication. In Proc. of the 7th Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling - Volume 110, APCCM 7810, pages 25-32.
  9. Brown, R. A. and Recker, J. C. (2011). Using virtual worlds for collaborative business process modeling. Business Process Management Journal, 17:In Press.
  10. Burkhart, B. J. and Fusco, M. E. (1996). Using animation to aid process flow visualization. In Proc. of the Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Common Ground (CHI'96), pages 21-22. ACM.
  11. Chen, C. (2005). Top 10 unsolved information visualization problems. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., 25:12-16.
  12. de Fraysseix, H., Pach, J., and Pollack, R. (1988). Small sets supporting fary embeddings of planar graphs. In Proc. of the 20th annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 426-433. ACM.
  13. Diehl, S. (2007). Visualizing the evolution of software systems. In Software Visualization, pages 129-147. Springer.
  14. Diguglielmo, G., Durocher, E., Kaplan, P., Sander, G., and Vasiliu, A. (2002). Graph layout for workflow applications with ilog jviews. In Proc. of the 10th International Symposium on Graph Drawing, pages 362-363. Springer.
  15. Eades, P., Lin, T., and Lin, X. (1993). Two tree drawing conventions. Int. J. Comput. Geometry Appl., 3(2):133- 153.
  16. Effinger, P., Siebenhaller, M., and Kaufmann, M. (2009). An interactive layout tool for bpmn. In Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing, pages 399-406, Los Alamitos, CA, USA. IEEE Computer Society.
  17. Eichhorn, D., Koschmider, A., Li, Y., Sturzel, P., Oberweis, A., and Trunko, R. (2009). 3d support for business process simulation. In Proc. of the 33rd Annual IEEE International Computer Software and Applications Conference, volume 1, pages 73-80. IEEE Computer Society.
  18. Freire, J., Silva, C., Callahan, S., Santos, E., Scheidegger, C., and Vo, H. (2006). Managing rapidly-evolving scientific workflows. In Moreau, L. and Foster, I., editors, Provenance and Annotation of Data, volume 4145 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 10-18. Springer.
  19. Galitz, W. O. (2002). The Essential Guide to User Interface Design: Introduction to GUI Design Principles and Techniques. Wiley & Sons.
  20. Green, T. M., Ribarsky, W., and Fisher, B. (2008). Visual analytics for complex concepts using a human cognition model. In Proc. of the IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST 2008), pages 91-98. IEEE Computer Society.
  21. Gulla, B. (1992). Improved maintenance support by multiversion visualizations. In Proc. of the 8th International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM 1992), pages 376-383. IEEE Computer Society.
  22. Hong, S.-H., Eades, P., Quigley, A., and Lee, S. H. (1998). Drawing algorithms for series-parallel digraphs in two and three dimensions. In Proc. of the 6th International Symposium on Graph Drawing, pages 198-209. Springer.
  23. Jablonski, S. and Goetz, M. (2008). Perspective oriented business process visualization. In ter Hofstede, A., Benatallah, B., and Paik, H.-Y., editors, Business Process Management Workshops, volume 4928 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 144-155. Springer.
  24. Kabicher, S., Kriglstein, S., and Rinderle-Ma, S. (2011). Visual change tracking for business process models. In Proc. of the 30th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER 2011). Springer.
  25. Kejser, T. and Grønbaek, K. (2004). The gaia framework: Version support in web based open hypermedia. IADIS International Journal of WWW/Internet, 2:17-33.
  26. Kettinger, W. J., Teng, J. T. C., and Guha, S. (1997). Business process change: A study of methodologies, techniques, and tools. MIS Quarterly, 21(1):55-80.
  27. Lu, R. and Sadiq, S. (2007). A survey of comparative business process modeling approaches. In Proc. of the 10th International Conference on Business Information Systems, pages 82-94. Springer.
  28. Lumsden, J. (2005). Guidelines for the design of onlinequestionnaires. Technical Report NRC 48231, National Research Council (of Canada).
  29. Matkovic, K., Hauser, H., Sainitzer, R., and Gröller, M. E. (2002). Process visualization with levels of detail. In Proc. of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis'02), pages 67-70. IEEE Computer Society.
  30. North, C. (2001). Multiple views and tight coupling in visualization: A language, taxonomy, and system. In Proc. of the International Conference on Imaging Science, Systems, and Technology Workshop of Fundamental Issues in Visualization, pages 626-632. CSREA Press.
  31. Nurcan, S. (2008). A survey on the flexibility requirements related to business processes and modeling artifacts. In Proc. of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pages 378-387. IEEE Computer Society.
  32. Nurcan, S. and Barrios, J. (2003). Enterprise knowledge and information system modelling in an evolving environment. In Proc. of the First International Workshop on Engineering Methods to Support Information Systems Evolution in Conjunction with OOIS'03, pages 1-14.
  33. Polyvyanyy, A., Smirnov, S., and Weske, M. (2008). Process model abstraction: A slider approach. In Proc.of the 12th International IEEE Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pages 325-331. IEEE Computer Society.
  34. Rajabi, B. A. and Lee, S. P. (2010). Modeling and analysis of change management in dynamic business process. International Journal of Computer and Electrical Engineering, 2(1):181-189.
  35. Reichert, M. and Dadam, P. (1998). Adeptflex - supporting dynamic changes of workflows without losing control. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 10:93-129.
  36. Rinderle, S., Bobrik, R., Reichert, M., and Bauer, T. (2006). Business process visualization - use cases, challenges, solutions. In Proc. of the 8th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, pages 204-211.
  37. Rinderle, S., Reichert, M., and Dadam, P. (2004). Correctness criteria for dynamic changes in workflow systems - a survey. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 50(1):9-34.
  38. Roberts, J. C. (1998). On encouraging multiple views for visualisation. In Proc. of the International Conference on Information Visualisation, pages 8-14. IEEE Computer Society.
  39. Schonenberg, H., Mans, R., Russell, N., Mulyar, N., and van der Aalst, W. (2008). Process flexibility: A survey of contemporary approaches. In Proc. of the 4th International Workshop CIAO! and 4th International Workshop EOMAS, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, pages 16-30. Springer.
  40. Schönhage, B., van Ballegooij, A., and Elliëns, A. (2000). 3d gadgets for business process visualization - a case study. In Proc. of the 5th Symposium on Virtual Reality Modeling Language (Web3D-VRML), pages 131- 138. ACM.
  41. Six, J. M. and Tollis, I. G. (2002). Automated visualization of process diagrams. In Revised Papers from the 9th International Symposium on Graph Drawing, pages 45-59. Springer.
  42. Stone, D., Jarrett, C., Woodroffe, M., and Minocha, S. (2005). User Interface Design and Evaluation. Morgan Kaufmann.
  43. Sugiyama, K. (2002). Graph drawing and applications for software and knowledge engineers. Series on software engineering and knowledge engineering,11. World Scientific Publishing Company.
  44. Therón, R., González, A., García, F., and Santos, P. (2007). The use of information visualization to support software configuration management. In Baranauskas, C., Palanque, P., Abascal, J., and Barbosa, S., editors, Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT 2007, volume 4663 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 317-331. Springer.
  45. van der Aalst, W. (2001). How to handle dynamic change and capture management information? an approach based on generic workflow models. International Journal of Computer Systems, Science and Engineering, 16(5):295-318.
  46. van der Aalst, W. and Jablonski, S. (2000). Dealing with workflow change: Identification of issues an solutions. Int'l Journal of Comp. Systems, Science and Engineering, 15(5):267-276.
  47. Weber, B., Reichert, M., and Rinderle-Ma, S. (2008). Change patterns and change support features - enhancing flexibility in process-aware information systems. Data Knowl. Eng., 66:438-466.
  48. West, T. G., Uhl, J. J., and Martinez, J. (2006). Seeing the unseen: visualization in education. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Educators Program. ACM.
  49. Wilson, C. E. (2007). Designing useful and usable questionnaires: you can't just ”throw a questionnaire together”. interactions, 14:48-63.
  50. Wörzberger, R., Ehses, N., and Heer, T. (2008). Adding support for dynamics patterns to static business process management systems. In Proc. of the 7th International Conference on Software Composition, pages 84-91. Springer.
  51. Zhao, X., Han, J., and Huang, Y. (2009). An automatic layout function in bpel visual modeling tool. In Proc. of the ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing, pages 14-17. IEEE Computer Society.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Kriglstein S. and Rinderle-Ma S. (2012). CHANGE VISUALIZATIONS IN BUSINESS PROCESSES - Requirements Analysis . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Graphics Theory and Applications and International Conference on Information Visualization Theory and Applications - Volume 1: IVAPP, (VISIGRAPP 2012) ISBN 978-989-8565-02-0, pages 584-593. DOI: 10.5220/0003815505840593


in Bibtex Style

@conference{ivapp12,
author={Simone Kriglstein and Stefanie Rinderle-Ma},
title={CHANGE VISUALIZATIONS IN BUSINESS PROCESSES - Requirements Analysis},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Graphics Theory and Applications and International Conference on Information Visualization Theory and Applications - Volume 1: IVAPP, (VISIGRAPP 2012)},
year={2012},
pages={584-593},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0003815505840593},
isbn={978-989-8565-02-0},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Graphics Theory and Applications and International Conference on Information Visualization Theory and Applications - Volume 1: IVAPP, (VISIGRAPP 2012)
TI - CHANGE VISUALIZATIONS IN BUSINESS PROCESSES - Requirements Analysis
SN - 978-989-8565-02-0
AU - Kriglstein S.
AU - Rinderle-Ma S.
PY - 2012
SP - 584
EP - 593
DO - 10.5220/0003815505840593