ARTIFICIAL CONVERSATIONAL COMPANIONS - A Requirements Analysis

Sviatlana Danilava, Stephan Busemann, Christoph Schommer

Abstract

This work is based on several attempts to provide a definition and a design approach of Artificial Companions that can be found in the referenced literature. We focus on computer agents that simulate human language behaviour and are aimed to serve, to assist and to accompany their owner over a long period of time, that we call Artificial Conversational Companions. Although accepted by the research community, the visions set very high expectations of such agents, but they do not address the technical feasibility and the system limitations. This is the first approach to define a set of features that allow an artificial agent to be regarded as an Artificial Conversational Companion. We describe relationships between the components and identify systematic shortcomings of the current systems. We propose a scalable method for implementing the desired capabilities of an Artificial Conversational Companion in a generic framework with reusable, customizable and interdependent components.

References

  1. Adam, C., Cavedon, L., and Padgham, L. (2010). ”Hello Emily, how are you today?”: personalised dialogue in a toy to engage children. In Proc. of the 2010 Workshop on CDS, pages 19-24. ACL.
  2. Agar, M. H. (1996). Language Shock: Understanding The Culture Of Conversation. Harper Paperbacks.
  3. Baxter, P., Belpaeme, T., Canamero, L., Cosi, P., Demiris, Y., and Enescu, V. (2011). Long-Term Human-Robot Interaction with Young Users. In IEEE/ACM HumanRobot Interaction 2011 Conf.
  4. Benyon, D. and Mival, O. (2008). Landscaping personification technologies: from interactions to relationships. In CHI EA 7808, pages 3657-3662.
  5. Benyon, D. and Mival, O. (2010). From human-computer interactions to human-companion relationships. In Proc. of the IITM 7810, pages 1-9.
  6. Bickmore, T. W. (2003). Relational Agents: Effecting Change through Human-Computer Relationships. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  7. Bickmore, T. W., Rosalind, and Picard, W. (2005). Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships. ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction, 12:293-327.
  8. Cook, V. (1992). Evidence for multi-competence. Language Learning, 42(4):557 - 591.
  9. Cowie, R. (2010). Companionship is an emotional business. In Close Engagements With Artificial Companions: Key Social, Psychological, Ethical and Design Issues. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  10. Cunningham, H., Wilks, Y., and Gaizauskas., R. (1996). GATE - a general architecture for text engineering. In Proceedings of COLING-96. ACL.
  11. Dobroth, K., Karis, D., and Zeigler, B. (1990). The design of conversationally capable automated systems. In Proceedings of the 13th Int. Symp. on Human Factors in Telecommunications, pages 389-396.
  12. Hall, J. K., Cheng, A., and Carlson, M. T. (2006). Reconceptualizing multicompetence as a theory of language knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 27(2):220-240.
  13. Knigge, A. F. (1805). Practical philosophy of social life: or, The art of conversing with men: after the German of Baron Knigge. Penniman & Bliss, O. Penniman, printers, Troy.
  14. Kruijff, G. J. and Lison, P. (2010). Policy activation for open-ended dialogue management. In Proc. of the AAAI 2010 Fall Symp. “Dialogue with Robots”. AAAI.
  15. Pulman, S. G., Boye, J., Cavazza, M., Smith, C., and de la Cámara, R. S. (2010). “How was your day?”. In Proc. of the 2010 Workshop on CDS, pages 37-42. ACL.
  16. Reeves, B. and Nass, C. (1996). The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places (CSLI - Lecture Notes). Cambridge University Press.
  17. Savoia, A. (2011). Pretotype pretotyping.blogspot.com/.
  18. Schäfer, U. (2008). Shallow, deep and hybrid processing with UIMA and Heart of Gold. In Proc. of the LREC-2008 Workshop Towards Enhanced Interoperability for Large HLT Systems: UIMA for NLP, 6th Int.
  19. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 43-50.
  20. Schröder, M., Bevacqua, E., Cowie, R., Eyben, F., Gunes, H., Heylen, D., ter Maat, M., McKeown, G., Pammi, S., Pantic, M., Pelachaud, C., Schuller, B., de Sevin, E., Valstar, M., and W öllmer, M. (2011). Building autonomous sensitive artificial listeners. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 99(1).
  21. Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. W. (2000). Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach (Language in Society). Wiley-Blackwell.
  22. Spranz-Fogasy, T. (2002). Interaktionsprofile: Die Herausbildung individueller Handlungstypik in Gesprächen. Radolfzell: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
  23. Sta°hl, O., Gambäck, B., Turunen, M., and Hakulinen, J. (2009). A mobile health and fitness companion demonstrator. In EACL 7809, pages 65-68.
  24. Strzalkowski, T., Broadwell, G. A., Stromer-Galley, J., Shaikh, S., Taylor, S., and Webb, N. (2010). Modeling socio-cultural phenomena in discourse. In Proc. of the 23rd Int. Conf. on Computational Linguistics, pages 1038-1046. ACL.
  25. Tannen, D. (2001). You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. William Morrow Paperbacks.
  26. Turunen, M., Hakulinen, J., Sta°hl, O., Gambäck, B., Hansen, P., Rodríguez Gancedo, M., de la Cámara, R., Smith, C., Charlton, D., and Cavazza, M. (2011). Multimodal and mobile conversational Health and Fitness Companions. Comput. Speech Lang., 25:192-209.
  27. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., and Jackson, D. D. (2000). Menschliche Kommunikation. Formen, Strungen, Paradoxien. Huber, Bern.
  28. Webb, N., Benyon, D., Hansen, P., and Mival, O. (2010). Evaluating human-machine conversation for appropriateness. In Proceedings of LREC2010.
  29. Wilks, Y. (2006). Artificial companions as a new kind of interface to the future internet. Technical report, Oxford Internet Institute.
  30. Wilks, Y. (2010). Is a companion a distinctive kind of relationship with a machine? In Proc. of the 2010 Workshop on Companionable Dialogue Systems, pages 13 - 18. ACL.
  31. Wilks, Y., Catizone, R., Worgan, S., Dingli, A., Moore, R., Field, D., and Cheng, W. (2011). A prototype for a conversational companion for reminiscing about images. Computer Speech & Language, 25(2):140 - 157.
  32. Young, R. F. (2011). Interactional competence in language learning, teaching, and testing. In Hinkel, E., editor, Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, volume 2, pages 426-443. London & New York: Routledge.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Danilava S., Busemann S. and Schommer C. (2012). ARTIFICIAL CONVERSATIONAL COMPANIONS - A Requirements Analysis . In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2: ICAART, ISBN 978-989-8425-96-6, pages 282-289. DOI: 10.5220/0003834702820289


in Bibtex Style

@conference{icaart12,
author={Sviatlana Danilava and Stephan Busemann and Christoph Schommer},
title={ARTIFICIAL CONVERSATIONAL COMPANIONS - A Requirements Analysis},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2: ICAART,},
year={2012},
pages={282-289},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0003834702820289},
isbn={978-989-8425-96-6},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2: ICAART,
TI - ARTIFICIAL CONVERSATIONAL COMPANIONS - A Requirements Analysis
SN - 978-989-8425-96-6
AU - Danilava S.
AU - Busemann S.
AU - Schommer C.
PY - 2012
SP - 282
EP - 289
DO - 10.5220/0003834702820289