ANALYZING COMPLAINT INTENTIONS IN ONLINE SHOPPING - The Perspective of Justice, Technology and Trust

Ing-Long Wu, Chu-Ying Fu

Abstract

Customers’ complaint behaviors are the key to repurchase intention in online shopping. An understanding of the behaviors can provide insight to failed service experience and in turn, effectively redress their problems. Therefore, it is important to examine the underlying drivers of complaint intentions in online shopping. Online shopping is operated in a web-based virtual store. Online shoppers are both the buyers of products and users of web-sites. Moreover, trust belief on e-vendors determines the psychological state of individual shopping behaviors. Three major concerns particularly arise in this context, individual behavior, technology use, and trust. This study thus proposed a novel research model in an integration of justice, technology use, and trust issues to examine customer satisfaction and complaint behaviors. Data were collected from an online survey with online-shopping experience. The empirical results indicated that distributive justice and interactional justice contribute significantly to customer satisfaction and complaint intentions as procedural justice does not. Technology-based features and trust belief are both important in determining the two target variables. Implications for managers and scholars are further discussed.

References

  1. Alexander, S., Ruderman, M., 1987. The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research 1 (2), 177-198.
  2. Bhattacherjee, A., 2001. Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly 25 (3), 351-370.
  3. Blodgett, J. G., Hill, D. J., Tax, S. S., 1997. The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on postcomplaint behavior. Journal of Retailing 73 (2), 185-210.
  4. Breazeale, M., 2009. Word of mouse. International Journal of Market Research 51 (3), 297-318.
  5. Chea, S., Luo, M. M., 2008. Post-adoption behaviors of eservice customers: the interplay of cognition and emotion. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 12 (3), 29-56.
  6. Chiu, C.-M., Lin, H.-Y., Sun, S.-Y., Hsu, M.-H., 2009. Understanding customers' loyalty intentions towards online shopping: an integration of technology acceptance model and fairness theory. Behaviour & Information Technology 28 (4), 347-360.
  7. Colquitt, J. A., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., Conlon, D. E., Ng, K. Y., 2001. Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (3), 425-445.
  8. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., Warshaw, P. R., 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 (8), 982-1003.
  9. Finn, A., Wang, L., Frank, T., 2009. Attribute perceptions, customer satisfaction and intention to recommend eservices. Journal of Interactive Marketing 23 (3), 209- 220.
  10. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., 2003. Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quarterly 27 (1), 51-90.
  11. Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., Rao, H. R., 2009. Trust and satisfaction, two stepping stones for successful ecommerce relationships: a longitudinal exploration, Information Systems Research 20 (2), 237-257.
  12. Kim, S. S., Son, J.-Y., 2009. Out of dedication or constraint? A dual model of post-adoption phenomena and its empirical test in the context of online services. MIS Quarterly 33 (1), 49-70.
  13. Martinez-Tur, V., Peiro, J. M., Ramos, J., Moliner, C., 2006. Justice perceptions as predictors of customer satisfaction: the impact of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 36 (1), 100-119.
  14. Maxham, J. G., Netemeyer, R. G., 2002. Modeling customer perceptions of complaint handling over time: the effects of perceived justice on satisfaction and intent. Journal of Retailing 78 (4), 239-252.
  15. Oliver, R. L., 1980. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research 17 (4), 460-469.
  16. Olsen, S. O., 2002. Comparative evaluation of the relationship between quality, satisfaction, and repurchase loyalty. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 30, 240-249.
  17. Palvia, P., 2009. The Role of trust in e-commerce relational exchange: a unified model, Information & Management 46 (4), 213-220.
  18. Pavlou, P. A., 2003. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce-integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 7 (3), 69-103.
  19. Pavlou, P. A., Gefen, D, 2004. Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research 15 (1), 37-59.
  20. Sangareddy, S. R. P., Jha, S., Chen, Y. E., Desouza, K. C., 2009. Attaining superior complaint resolution. Communications of the ACM 52 (10), 122-126.
  21. Shankar, V., Smith, A. K., Rangaswamy, A., 2003. Customer satisfaction and loyalty in online and offline environments. International Journal of Research in Marketing 20 (2), 153-175.
  22. Singh, J., 1988. Consumer complaint intentions and behavior: definitional and taxonomical issues. The Journal of Marketing 52 (1), 93-107.
  23. Smith, A. K., Bolton, R. N., Wagner, J., 1999. A model of customer satisfaction with service encounters involving failure and recovery. Journal of Marketing Research 36 (3), 356-372.
  24. Tax, S. S., Brown, S. W., Chandrashekaran, M., 1998. Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences: implications for relationship marketing. The Journal of Marketing 62 (2), 60-76.
  25. Thogersen, J., Juhl, H. J., Poulsen, C. S., 2009. Complaining: a function of attitude, personality, and situation. Psychology & Marketing 26 (8), 760-777.
  26. Thong, Y. L., Hong, S. J., Tam, K. Y., 2006. The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectationconfirmation model for information technology continuance. International Journal of HumanComputer Studies 64, 799-810.
  27. Turel, O., Yuan, Y., Connelly, C. E., 2008. In justice we trust: predicting user scceptance of e-customer services. Journal of Management Information Systems 24 (4), 123-151.
  28. Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., 2005. A service perspective on the drivers of complaint intentions. Journal of Service Research 8 (2), 192-204.
  29. Wu, I. L., Chen, J. L. 2005. An extension of trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of online tax: an empirical study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62 (6), 784-808.
  30. Yen, C.-H., Lu, H.-P., 2008. Factors influencing online auction repurchase intention. Internet Research 18 (1), 7-25.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Wu I. and Fu C. (2012). ANALYZING COMPLAINT INTENTIONS IN ONLINE SHOPPING - The Perspective of Justice, Technology and Trust . In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1: WEBIST, ISBN 978-989-8565-08-2, pages 511-517. DOI: 10.5220/0003880705110517


in Bibtex Style

@conference{webist12,
author={Ing-Long Wu and Chu-Ying Fu},
title={ANALYZING COMPLAINT INTENTIONS IN ONLINE SHOPPING - The Perspective of Justice, Technology and Trust},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1: WEBIST,},
year={2012},
pages={511-517},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0003880705110517},
isbn={978-989-8565-08-2},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1: WEBIST,
TI - ANALYZING COMPLAINT INTENTIONS IN ONLINE SHOPPING - The Perspective of Justice, Technology and Trust
SN - 978-989-8565-08-2
AU - Wu I.
AU - Fu C.
PY - 2012
SP - 511
EP - 517
DO - 10.5220/0003880705110517