TEACHER’S SCAFFOLDING BEHAVIOR IN CSCL - A Case Study

Anouschka van Leeuwen, Jeroen Janssen, Gijsbert Erkens, Mieke Brekelmans

Abstract

There is a gap in our knowledge about what cognitions play a role while teachers scaffold students in CSCL. A case study was performed that investigated a history teacher’s behavior and cognitions. The quantitative results fit with what is known about teacher behavior, and the qualitative data adds an explanation of why the teacher acted the way he did. Major influences were the teacher’s beliefs about effective instruction and his prior knowledge of the students. The results show that although often not done explicitly, there is indeed a phase of diagnosing and evaluating students’ work connected to performing an intervention.

References

  1. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., and Archer, W., (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks , 5(2), 1-17. doi:10.1.1.95.9117
  2. Asterhan, C., and Schwarz, B., (2010). Online moderation of synchronous e-argumentation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5, 259-282. doi:10.1007/s11412-010-9088-2
  3. Clark, C. M., and Peterson, P. L., (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M.C. Wittrock (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching. New York: MacMillan.
  4. De Smet, M., Van Keer, H., De Wever, B., and Valcke, M., (2010). Studying Thought Processes of Online Peer Tutors through Stimulated-Recall Interviews. Higher Education, 59(5), 645-661. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9273-2
  5. Den Brok, P., (2001). Teaching and student outcomes: A study on teachers' thoughts and actions from an interpersonal and a learning activities perspective. Dissertation, Utrecht University.
  6. Gil, J., Schwarz, B. B., and Asterhan, C. S. C., (2007). Intuitive moderation styles and beliefs of teachers in CSCLbased argumentation. In C.A. Chinn, G. Erkens & S. Puntambekar (Eds.) Mice, minds and society. Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference (pp. 219-228). International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
  7. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., and Kanselaar, G., (2007). Visualization of agreement and discussion processes during computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1105-1125. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.10.005
  8. Kreber, C., and Cranton, P. A., (1997). Teaching as scholarship: A model for instructional development. Issues and Inquiry in College Learning and Teaching, 19(2), 4-13.
  9. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., and Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335-353. doi:10.1016/S0747- 5632(02)00057-2
  10. Molenaar, I., van Boxtel, C. and Sleegers, P. J. C., (2011). Metacognitive scaffolding in an innovative learning arrangement. Instructional Science, 39, 785-803. doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9154-1
  11. Myhill, D., and Warren, P., (2005). Scaffolds or straitjackets? Critical moments in classroom discourse. Educational Review, 57, 55-69. doi:10.1080/0013191042000274187
  12. Salmon, G., (2003). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page Limited.
  13. Soller, A., Martinez, A., Jermann, P., and Muehlenbrock, M., (2005). From mirroring to guiding: A review of state of the art technology for supporting collaborative learning. International Journal of AI in Education, 15, 261-290. doi:10.1.1.26.2186
  14. Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., and Beishuizen, J., (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271- 296. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
  15. Van Diggelen, W., Janssen, J., and Overdijk, M., (2008). Analysing and presenting interaction data: a teacher, student and researcher perspective. ICLS'08 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on International conference for the learning sciences - Volume 3.
  16. Vlachopoulos, P. and Cowan, J., (2010). Choices of approaches in e-moderation: Conclusions from a grounded theory study. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(3), 213-224. doi: 10.1177/1469787410379684
  17. Volman, M., (2005). A variety of roles for a new type of teacher: Educational technology and the teaching profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 15- 31. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.11.003
  18. Vygotsky, L. S., (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

van Leeuwen A., Janssen J., Erkens G. and Brekelmans M. (2012). TEACHER’S SCAFFOLDING BEHAVIOR IN CSCL - A Case Study . In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-8565-07-5, pages 304-312. DOI: 10.5220/0003918703040312


in Bibtex Style

@conference{csedu12,
author={Anouschka van Leeuwen and Jeroen Janssen and Gijsbert Erkens and Mieke Brekelmans},
title={TEACHER’S SCAFFOLDING BEHAVIOR IN CSCL - A Case Study},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,},
year={2012},
pages={304-312},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0003918703040312},
isbn={978-989-8565-07-5},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,
TI - TEACHER’S SCAFFOLDING BEHAVIOR IN CSCL - A Case Study
SN - 978-989-8565-07-5
AU - van Leeuwen A.
AU - Janssen J.
AU - Erkens G.
AU - Brekelmans M.
PY - 2012
SP - 304
EP - 312
DO - 10.5220/0003918703040312