Essam Zaneldin


Existing course management systems do not consider the management of course material changes, particularly courses that require more than one instructor. It is also important to communicate these changes to students registered in the course. Moreover, having one single repository of course material at the department level is very useful and can help the course assessment committee in each department to easily access course grades to perform quantitative course assessment. Existing learning systems lack three important features: (1) tracking changes made to course material; (2) informing instructors and students when a new material is uploaded and when an existing material is changed; and (3) managing changes. To overcome the above drawbacks, a course material change-management system was developed using Visual Basic programming language and Access database and was tested using a hypothetical case study. The novel aspect of the developed system is the effective management of changes made to course material and communicating these changes to instructors and students in a timely manner.


  1. Adhikari, D., 2010. Knowledge management in academic institutions. International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 24, Issue 2, pp. 91-104.
  2. Bouhnik, D., and Marcus, T., 2006. Interaction in distance-learning courses. Journal of the American Society Information Science and Technology, Vol. 57, Issue 3, pp. 299-305.
  3. Capper, J., 2001. E-learning growth and promise for the developing world. TechKnowLogia, May/June. <http:// www.techknowlogia.org>. Knowledge Enterprise, Inc., pp. 7-10.
  4. Hinger, D., 2007. Promising practices in videoconferencing. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on e-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2007 (p. 2035). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  5. Kaminski, J., 2005. Editorial: Moodle - a user-friendly, open source course management system. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics (OJNI), Vol. 9, Issue 1. Online.
  6. Kramer, B. et al., 2010. Sharing educational knowledge and best practices in edu-sharing. Second International Conference on Mobile, Hybrid and On-Line Learning, 978-0-7695-3955-3/10 IEEE, pp. 53-59.
  7. Liaw, S., 2008. Investigating students' perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: a case study of the Blackboard system. Computers and Education, Vol. 51, pp. 864-873.
  8. Liaw, S., Huang, H. M., and Chen, G. D., 2007. An activity-theoretical approach to investigate learners' factors toward e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 23, pp. 1906-1920.
  9. Martín-Blas, T., and Serrano-Fernández, A., 2009. The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in physics. Computers and Education, Vol. 52, pp. 35-44.
  10. Microsoft Office Access, 2003. Microsoft Corp., One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA, USA.
  11. Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0, 1998. Microsoft Corp., One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA, USA.
  12. Monahan, T., McArdle, G., and Bertolotto, M., 2008. Virtual reality for collaborative e-learning. Computers and Education, Vol. 50, pp. 1339-1353.
  13. Ngai, E.W.T., Poon, J.K.L., and Chan, Y.H.C., 2007. Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM. Computers and Education, Vol. 48, pp. 250-267.
  14. Raab, R. T., Ellis, W. W., and Abdon, B. R., 2002. Multisectoral partnerships in e-learning a potential force for improved human capital development in the Asia Pacific. Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 4, pp. 217-229.
  15. Saw, K. G., Majid, O., Abdul Ghani, N., Atan, H., Idrus, R. M., Rahman, Z. A., et al., 2008. The videoconferencing learning environment: technology, interaction and learning intersect. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 39, pp. 3475.
  16. Smith, M., Wood, W., Adams, W., Wieman, C., Knight, J., Guild, N., Su, T., 2009. Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, Vol. 323, Issue 5910, pp. 122-124.
  17. Stump, G., Hilpert, J., Husman, J., Chung, W-T. Kim, W., 2011. Collaborative learning in engineering students: gender and achievement. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol., 100, Issue 3, pp. 475-497.
  18. Thurmond, V. A., and Wambach, K., 2004. Understanding interactions in distance education: a review of the literature. Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, Vol. 1, pp. 9-33.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Zaneldin E. (2012). A SYSTEM FOR MANAGING CHANGES IN COURSE MATERIAL . In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-8565-06-8, pages 247-252. DOI: 10.5220/0003953802470252

in Bibtex Style

author={Essam Zaneldin},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,
SN - 978-989-8565-06-8
AU - Zaneldin E.
PY - 2012
SP - 247
EP - 252
DO - 10.5220/0003953802470252