Resource-oriented Consistency Analysis of Engineering Processes

Bernhard Bauer, Thomas Eisenbarth, Christoph Frenzel, Benjamin Honke

Abstract

A number of popular engineering processes and methodologies emerged over the past years which attracted interest in research and industry. For process enactment, enterprises have to match requirements of engineering processes with existing resources. Therefore, it has to be analyzed if employees have sufficient skills or if infrastructure has sufficient capabilities to match the requirements of a situational process. Both, maintaining a skill and resource database and matching requirements against this database are an enormously challenging and time-consuming task. Additionally, this matching has to be carried out regularly as employees join and leave the company and skills change over time. Based upon a formal, logical base, we present an approach that combines ontological and metamodeling technical spaces and enables an automatic analysis of engineering processes regarding the existence of necessary resources.

References

  1. Abran, A., Moore, J. W., Bourque, P., and Dupuis, R., editors (2005). Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge. IEEE Computer Society Press.
  2. AUTOSAR Consortium (2011). AUTOSAR. Official website of the AUTOSAR development partnership.
  3. Cabanillas, C., Resinas, M., and Ruiz-Cortés, A. (2011). Towards the definition and analysis of resource assignments in BPMN 2.0. International Conference on BPM.
  4. CMMI Product Team (2011). CMMI. CMMI Main page managed by SEI.
  5. Dorling, A. (2007). Spice: Software process improvement and capability determination. Software Quality Journal, 2(4):209-224.
  6. Dorn, J., Naz, T., and Pichlmair, M. (2007). Ontology development for human resource management. In Stary, C., Barachini, F., and Hawamdeh, S., editors, Knowledge Management Innovation Technology and Cultures, pages 109-120. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
  7. Fadel, F. G., Fox, M. S., and Gruninger, M. (1994). A generic enterprise resource ontology, pages 117-128. IEEE Comput. Soc. Press.
  8. Fox, M. S. and Gruninger, M. (1998). Enterprise modeling. AI Magazine, 19(3):109-121.
  9. Friedrich, J., Hammerschall, U., Kuhrmann, M., and Sihling, M. (2008). Das V-Modell XT. Springer.
  10. Grau, B. C., Horrocks, I., Motik, B., Parsia, B., PatelSchneider, P., and Sattler, U. (2008). OWL2: The Next Step for OWL. Journal on Web Semantics, 6(4):309 - 322.
  11. Gruhn, V. (1991). Validation and verification of software process models. In Endres, A. and Weber, H., editors, Software Development Environments and CASE Technology, pages 271-286. Springer.
  12. Harmsen, A. F. (1997). Situational method engineering. Requirements Engineering, 5(9):167-78.
  13. Henderson-Sellers, B. and Gonzalez-Perez, C. (2008). Comparison of Method Chunks and Method Fragments for Situational Method Engineering, pages 479-488. IEEE Computer Society.
  14. Henderson-Sellers, B. and Ralyté, J. (2010). Situational Method Engineering: State-of-the-Art Review. Journal Of Universal Computer Science, 16(3):424-478.
  15. Hepp, M. and Roman, D. (2007). An ontology framework for semantic business process management. Information Systems Journal, pages 1-18.
  16. Hug, C., Front, A., and Rieu, D. (2008). A process engineering method based on ontology and patterns. In ICSOFT (ISDM/ABF)7808, pages 29-36.
  17. IEEE Computer Society Press, editor (2001). Model driven process engineering.
  18. Kurtev, I., Bezivin, J., and Aksit, M. (2002). Technological spaces: An initial appraisal. In Editors, editor, Language, volume 2002, pages 1-6.
  19. Mirbel, I. and Ralyt, J. (2005). Situational method engineering: combining assembly-based and roadmap-driven approaches. Requir. Eng., 11:58-78.
  20. Object Management Group (2011). Business process model and notation. OMG document.
  21. Uschold, M. and Gruninger, M. (1996). Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Engineering Review, 11:93-136.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Bauer B., Eisenbarth T., Frenzel C. and Honke B. (2012). Resource-oriented Consistency Analysis of Engineering Processes . In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-8565-12-9, pages 206-211. DOI: 10.5220/0003984302060211


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis12,
author={Bernhard Bauer and Thomas Eisenbarth and Christoph Frenzel and Benjamin Honke},
title={Resource-oriented Consistency Analysis of Engineering Processes},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2012},
pages={206-211},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0003984302060211},
isbn={978-989-8565-12-9},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - Resource-oriented Consistency Analysis of Engineering Processes
SN - 978-989-8565-12-9
AU - Bauer B.
AU - Eisenbarth T.
AU - Frenzel C.
AU - Honke B.
PY - 2012
SP - 206
EP - 211
DO - 10.5220/0003984302060211