Facing the Change - Towards a Dynamic Decision Making in Manufacturing Environments

Tom Hänel, Carsten Felden

Abstract

Globalization and increased informal networks lead to a dynamic competitive environment in manufacturing, where uncertainties arise from consistently changing customer demands. Their management is a key challenge for growth and sustainability, while there is evidence that organizations cannot achieve an adequate manufacturing flexibility. Therefore, the paper`s goal is to investigate the benefits of a closed loop dynamic decision making in manufacturing. A qualitative approach using case study research and expert interviews explores the contribution of Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) and Operational Business Intelligence (OpBI) in this area. The results indicate that manufacturing flexibility challenges organizations, while the issue is supportable by MES and OpBI in order to face the changing customer requirements. In conclusion a case-specific awareness level of flexibility becomes apparent motivating further research to contribute to a dynamic decision making and its IT support in manufacturing.

References

  1. Alpar, P., Louis, J. P., 2007. Eine empirische Untersuchung der Softwareunterstützung bei der Fertigung und Qualitätssteuerung. PhilippsUniversität Marburg.
  2. Barret, J., Barger, R., 2010. Supply Chain Strategy for Industrial Manufacturers: The Handbook for Becoming Demand Driven. Retrieved April 16, 2012, from www.gartner.com/id=1430728.
  3. Beach, R., Muhlemann, A. P., Price, D. H. R., Paterson, A., Sharp, J. A., 2000. A review of manufacturing flexibility. European Journal of Operational Research, 122, 41-57.
  4. Browne, J., Dubois, D., Rathmill, K., Sethi, S. P., Stecke, E., 1984. Classification of flexible manufacturing systems. The FMS Magazine, 22, 114-117.
  5. Eckerson, W. W., 2007. Best Practices in Operational BI: Converging Analytical and Operational Processes. TDWI Best Practices Report, Renton (WA).
  6. Felden, C., Chamoni P., Linden M., 2010. From Process Execution towards a Business Process Intelligence. In Abramowicz, W. and Tolksdorf, R. (Eds.) Business Information Systems 13th International Conference, May 3-5, Berlin, Germany, 195-206.
  7. Gebauer, J., Lee, F., 2005. Towards an "Optimal" Level of Information Systems Flexibility: A Conceptual Model. In Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Information Systems, May 26-28, Regensburg, Germany.
  8. Gluchowski, P., Kemper, H., Seufert, A., 2009. Innovative Prozess-Steuerung. BI-Spektrum, 4, 1, 8-12.
  9. Hänel, T., Felden, C., 2011. Limits or Integration? Manufacturing Execution Systems and Operational Business Intelligence. In Amercias Conference on Informations Systems, August 05-07, Detroit, USA.
  10. Hayes, R. H., Wheelwright, S. C., 1984. Restoring our Competitive Edge: Competing Through Manufacturing. Wiley, New York.
  11. ISA ANSI/ISA-95.00.01-2000, 2000. Enterprise Control System Integration, Part 1: Models and Terminology. ISA technical paper.
  12. ISO 9000, 2005. Quality management systems: Fundamentals and vocabulary. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
  13. Flick, U., (2006). An introduction to qualitative research. SAGE Publications, London.
  14. Kletti, J., 2007. Manufacturing Execution Systems. Springer, Berlin.
  15. Koch, M., Lasi, H., Baars, H., Kemper, H. G., 2010. Manufacturing Execution Systems and Business Intelligence for Production Environments. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, August 12-15, Lima, Peru.
  16. KPMG, 2011. Global Manufacturing Outlook: Growth while Managing Volatility. Retrieved April 16, 2012, from www.kpmg.com/global/en/issuesandinsights/ articlespublications/global-manufacturing-outlook/ pages/growth-while-managing-volatility.aspx.
  17. Patel, P. C., Terjesen, S., Li, D., 2011. Enhancing effects of manufacturing flexibility through operational absorptive capacity and operational ambidexterity, Journal of Operations Management, doi:10.1016/j.jom.2011.10.004.
  18. Rodriguez, R.A., 2007. Aligning IT to Business Processes. Retrieved April 16, 2012, from www.appian.com/ bpm-resources/papers_reports/report_aberdeen1.pdf.
  19. Rogalski, S., 2011. Flexibility Measurement in Production Systems, Springer, Berlin.
  20. Rolón, M., Martínez, E., 2012. Agent-based modeling and simulation of an autonomic manufacturing execution system. Computers in Industry, 63, 53-78.
  21. Saenz de Ugarte, B., Artiba, A., Pellerin, R., 2009. Manufacturing execution system: a literature review. Production Planning and Control, 20(6), 525-539.
  22. Schrödl, H., 2006. Business Intelligence. Hanser, München, Wien.
  23. Upton, D., 1994. The management of manufacturing flexibility. California Management Review, 36, 72-89.
  24. Vokurka, R. J., O'Leary-Kelly S. W., 2000. A review of empirical research on manufacturing flexibility. Journal of Operations Management, 18, 485-501.
  25. White, C., 2006. The Next Generation of Business Intelligence: Operational BI. Retrieved April 16, 2012, from certification.sybase.com/content/1041416/ Sybase_OperationalBI_WP-071906.pdf.
  26. Yin, R. K., 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE, Los Angeles.
  27. Younus, M., Peiyong, C., Hu, L., Yuqing, F., 2010. MES Development and Significant Applications in Manufacturing - A Review. In 2nd International Conference on Education Technology and Computer, June 22-24, Shanghai, China.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Hänel T. and Felden C. (2012). Facing the Change - Towards a Dynamic Decision Making in Manufacturing Environments . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing - Volume 1: KMIS, (IC3K 2012) ISBN 978-989-8565-31-0, pages 107-112. DOI: 10.5220/0004107601070112


in Bibtex Style

@conference{kmis12,
author={Tom Hänel and Carsten Felden},
title={Facing the Change - Towards a Dynamic Decision Making in Manufacturing Environments},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing - Volume 1: KMIS, (IC3K 2012)},
year={2012},
pages={107-112},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004107601070112},
isbn={978-989-8565-31-0},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing - Volume 1: KMIS, (IC3K 2012)
TI - Facing the Change - Towards a Dynamic Decision Making in Manufacturing Environments
SN - 978-989-8565-31-0
AU - Hänel T.
AU - Felden C.
PY - 2012
SP - 107
EP - 112
DO - 10.5220/0004107601070112