The Institutional Stance in Agent-based Simulations

Giovanni Sileno, Alexander Boer, Tom Van Engers

Abstract

This paper presents a multi-agent framework intended to animate scenarios of compliance and non-compliance in a normative system. With the purpose of describing social human behaviour, we choose to reduce social complexity by creating models of the involved agents starting from stories, and completing them with background theories derived from common-sense and expert knowledge. For this reason, we explore how an institutional perspective can be taken into account in a computational framework. Roles, institutions and rules become components of the agent architecture. The social intelligence of the agent is distributed to several cognitive modules, performing the institutional thinking, whose outcomes are coordinated in the main decision-making cycle. The institutional logic is analyzed from a general simulation perspective, and a concrete possible choice is presented, drawn from fundamental legal concepts. As a concrete result, a preliminary implementation of the framework has been developed with Jason.

References

  1. Batten, D. F. (2000). Discovering Artificial Economics. Westview Press.
  2. Boer, A. (2009). Legal Theory, Sources of Law and the Semantic Web. IOS Press.
  3. Boer, A. and Van Engers, T. (2011). An Agent-based Legal Knowledge Acquisition Methodology for Agile Public Administration. ICAIL 2011: The Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, June.
  4. Bordini, R. H., H ├╝bner, J. F., and Wooldridge, M. (2007). Programming multi-agent systems in AgentSpeak using Jason. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  5. Breuker, J. (1994). Components of problem solving and types of problems. A Future for Knowledge Acquisition, 867:118-136.
  6. Chu, D. (2011). Complexity: against systems. Theory in biosciences, 130(3):229-45.
  7. Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (2008). Can a General Deontic Logic Capture the Facts of Human Moral Reasoning? How the Mind Interprets Social Exchange Rules and Detects Cheaters. In Sinnott-Armstrong, W., editor, Moral psychology, pages 53-119. MIT Press, Cambridge.
  8. Dennett, D. C. (1987). The Intentional Stance. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 7th edition.
  9. Duffy, J. (2006). Agent-based models and human subject experiments. Handbook of computational economics, 2(05):949-1011.
  10. Fonagy, P. and Target, M. (1997). Attachment and reflective function: their role in self-organization. Development and psychopathology, 9(4):679-700.
  11. Hohfeld, W. N. (1917). Fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning. The Yale Law Journal, 26(8):710-770.
  12. Kowalski, R. A. (2010). Computational Logic and Human Thinking: How to be Artificially Intelligent. Number November. Cambridge University Press.
  13. MacCormick, N. (1998). Norms, institutions, and institutional facts. Law and Philosophy, 17(3):301-345.
  14. Neumann, M. (2010). A classification of normative architectures. Simulating Interacting Agents and Social Phenomena, 7:3-18.
  15. Sartor, G. (2006). Fundamental legal concepts: A formal and teleological characterisation. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 14(1):101-142.
  16. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.
  17. Shoham, Y. and Leyton-brown, K. (2009). Multiagent systems: Algorithmic, game-theoretic, and logical foundations. Cambridge Univ Pr.
  18. Tuori, K. (2006). Self-description and external description of the law. No Foundations, 2:27-43.
  19. Vatiero, M. (2010). From W. N. Hohfeld to J. R. Commons, and Beyond? Journal of Economics, 69(2).
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Sileno G., Boer A. and Van Engers T. (2013). The Institutional Stance in Agent-based Simulations . In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1: ICAART, ISBN 978-989-8565-38-9, pages 255-261. DOI: 10.5220/0004257602550261


in Bibtex Style

@conference{icaart13,
author={Giovanni Sileno and Alexander Boer and Tom Van Engers},
title={The Institutional Stance in Agent-based Simulations},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1: ICAART,},
year={2013},
pages={255-261},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004257602550261},
isbn={978-989-8565-38-9},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1: ICAART,
TI - The Institutional Stance in Agent-based Simulations
SN - 978-989-8565-38-9
AU - Sileno G.
AU - Boer A.
AU - Van Engers T.
PY - 2013
SP - 255
EP - 261
DO - 10.5220/0004257602550261