An Analysis of Supply Chain Collaboration and Its Impact on Firm Performance - An Integration of Social Capital, Justice, and Technology Use

Mai-Lun Chiu, Chu-Ying Fu, Ing-Long Wu

Abstract

Collaboration has become a critical component to fulfill the need for integration in the supply chain. From a discussion of the literature, there are two major underlying concerns arising in the collaboration, organization's sharing behaviors and technology use behaviors. In expectation confirmation theory, an organization's sharing behaviors may initially mean a pre-expectation of common resources available in the supply chain and further, a perceived fairness between participants for the willingness to participate in the partnership. Social capital theory and justice theory, in essence, explain the two beliefs of supply chain members as the IS success model defining the belief of technology use. This study integrates the three key issues to examine collaboration in a comprehensive and unique way and its role in affecting focal firm performance. Empirical findings have led to better understanding of the relative effects of the three issues and a well-achieved organizational performance.

References

  1. Beamon, B. M. 1999. “Measuring Supply Chain Performance.” International Journal of Operations and Production Management 19(3):275-292.
  2. Bernardes, E. S. 2010. “The effect of supply management on aspects of social capital and the impact on performance: A social network perspective.” Journal of Supply Chain Management 46(1): 45-55.
  3. Bhattacherjee, A. 2001. “Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model.” MIS Quarterly 25(3):351-370.
  4. Chea, S., and Luo, M. M. 2008. “Post-adoption behaviors of e-service customers: The interplay of cognition and emotion.” International Journal of Electronic Commerce 12(3):29-56.
  5. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, W. J., Porter, COLH., and Ng, K. Y. 2001. “Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.” Journal of Applied Psychology 86(3):425-445.
  6. Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C. A., and Chen, P. Y. 2002. “Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice.” Group and Organization Management 27(3):324-351.
  7. Delone, W. H., and Mclean, E. R. 2003. “The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update.” Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4):9-30.
  8. Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. 1981. “Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics.” Journal of Marketing Research 18(3):382-388.
  9. Griffith, D.A., Harvey, M.G., and Lusch, R.E. 2006. “Social exchange in supply chain relationships: The resulting benefits of procedural and distributive Justice.” Journal of Operations Management 24(2):85-98.
  10. Gunasekaran, A., and Ngai, E. W. T. 2004. “Information Systems in Supply Chain Integration and Management.” European Journal of Operational Research 155(2):269-295.
  11. Higgins, M., and Ellis, N. 2009. “Ethics and industrial networks: A levinasian approach towards the study of justice in the supply chain.” In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Supply Chain, Marseille.
  12. Kahn, K. B., Maltz, E.N., and Mentzer, J.T. 2006. “Demand collaboration: effects on knowledge creation, relationships, and supply chain performance.” Journal of Business Logistics 27(2):191-221.
  13. Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. Y., and Wei, K, K. 2005. “Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation.” MIS Quarterly 29(1):113-143.
  14. Konovsky, M. A. 2000. “Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations.” Journal of Management 26(3):489-511.
  15. Krause, D. R., Handfield, R. B., and Tyler, B. B. 2007. “The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement.” Journal of Operations Management 25(2):528-545.
  16. Kumar, K., and van Dissel, H. G. 1996. “Sustainable collaboration: Managing conflict and cooperation in interorganizational systems.” MIS Quarterly 20(3):279-300.
  17. Kwon, I. W. G., and Suh, T. 2005. “Trust, commitment and relationships in supply chain management: A path analysis.” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 10(1):26-33.
  18. Lambert, D. M., Cooper, M. C., and Pagh, J. D. 1998. “Supply chain management: Implementation issues and research opportunities.” International Journal of Logistics Management 9(2):1-19.
  19. Lawson, B., Tyler, B. B., and Cousins, P. D. 2008. “Antecedents and consequences of social capital on buyer performance improvement.” Journal of Operations Management 26(3):446-460.
  20. Li, S., Ragu-Nathan, B., Ragu-Nathan, T.S., and Rao, S.S. 2006. “The impact of SCM practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance.” Omega 34(2):107-124.
  21. Luo, Y. 2006. “Toward the micro- and macro-level consequences of interactional justice in cross cultural joint ventures.” Human Relations 59(8):1019-1047.
  22. Luo, Y. 2007. “The independent and interactive roles of procedural, distributive, and interactional justice in strategic alliances.” Academy of Management Journal 50(3):644-664.
  23. Mentzer, J. T., Foggin, J. H., and Golicic, S.L. 2000. “Collaboration: the enablers, impediments, and benefits.” Supply Chain Management Review 4(4):52-58.
  24. Min, K., Stephen, K., and Chen, H., 2008. “Developing social identity and social capital for supply chain management.” Journal of Business Logistics 29(1):283-304.
  25. Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S. 1998. “Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage.” Academy of Management Review 23(2):242-266.
  26. Narasimhan, R., Nair, A., Griffith, D. A., Arlbjørn, J.S., and Bendoly, E. 2009. “Lock-in situations in supply chains: A social exchange theoretic study of sourcing arrangements in buyer-supplier relationships.” Journal of Operations Management 27(5):374-389.
  27. Oliver, R. L. 1981. “Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction processes in retail settings.” Journal of Retailing 57(3):25-48.
  28. Omar, A., Davis-Sramek, B., Myers, M. B., and Mentzer, J.T. 2012. “A global analysis of orientation, coordination, and flexibility in supply chains.” Journal of Business Logistics 33(2):128-144.
  29. Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D., and Evans, K. R. 2006. “Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: A meta-analysis.” Journal of Marketing 70(4):136-53.
  30. Patrashkova-Volzdoska, R. R., McComb, S. A., Green, S. G., and Compton, W. D. 2003. “Examining a Curvilinear Relationship between Communication Frequency and Team Performance in Cross-functional Project Teams.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 50(3):262-269.
  31. Patterson, K. A., Grimm, C.M., and Corsi, T. M. 2003. “Adopting new technologies for supply chain management.” Transportation Research Part E 39 (2):95-121.
  32. Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., and Seth, N. 2006. “Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities.” MIS Quarterly 30(2):225-246.
  33. Richey, R. G., Adams, F. G., and Dalela, V. 2012. “Technology and flexibility: Enablers of collaboration and time-Based Logistics quality.” Journal of Business Logistics 33(1):34-49.
  34. Robert, L. P., Dennis, A. R., and Ahuja, M. 2008. “Social capital and knowledge integration in digitally enabled teams.” Information Systems Research 19(3):314-334.
  35. Sahin, F., and Robinson, E. P. 2002. “Flow coordination and information sharing in supply chains: Review, implications, and directions for future research.” Decision Sciences 33(4):505-536.
  36. Sanders, N. R., and Premus, R. 2005. “Modeling the relationship between firm IT capability, collaboration, and performance.” Journal of Business Logistics 26(1):1-23.
  37. Smith, G. E., Watson, K. J., Baker, W. H., and Pokorski II, J. A. 2007. “A critical balance: Collaboration and security in the IT-enabled supply chain.” International Journal of Production Research 45(11):2595-2613.
  38. Son, J. Y., and Kim, S. S. 2008. “Internet users' information privacy-protective responses: A taxonomy and a nomological model.” MIS Quarterly 32(3):503-529.
  39. Subramani, M. 2004. “How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships?” MIS Quarterly 28(1):45-73.
  40. Sun, S. Y., Chao, P. J., and Wu, C. Y. 2009. “A study on the satisfaction of supply chain management systems from the view of justice and value.” Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Electronic Business, Macau, China.
  41. Tan, K. C., Lyman, S. B., and Wisner, J. D. 2002. “Supply chain management: A strategic perspective.” International Journal of Operation and Production Management 22(6):614-631.
  42. Venkatesh, V., and Bala, H. 2008. “Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions.” Decision Sciences 39(2):273-315.
  43. Vickery, S. K., Jayaram, J., Droge, C., and Calantone, R. 2003. “The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: An analysis of direct versus indirect relationships.” Journal of Operations Management 21(5):523-539.
  44. Villena, V. H., Revilla, E., and Choi, T. Y. 2011. “The dark side of buyer-supplier relationships: A social capital perspective.” Journal of Operations Management 29(6):561-576.
  45. Wagner, S. M., and Eggert, A., and Lindemann, E. 2010. “Creating and appropriating value in collaborative relationships.” Journal of Business Research 63(8):840-848.
  46. Wang, Y. S. 2008. “Assessing e-commerce systems success: A respecification and validation of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success.” Information Systems Journal 18(5):529-557.
  47. Wasko, M. M., and Faraj, S. 2005. “Why should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice.” MIS Quarterly 29(1):35-57.
  48. Yang, J., Wang, J., Wong, C. W. Y., and Lai, K.H. 2008. “Relational stability and alliance performance in supply chain.” Omega 36(4):600-608.
  49. Zacharia, Z. G., Nancy, W. N., and Robert, F.L. 2009. “An analysis of supply chain collaborations and their effect on performance outcomes.” Journal of Business Logistics 30(2):101-123.
  50. Zhang, C., and Dhaliwal, J. 2009. “An investigation of resource-based and institutional theoretical factors in technology adoption for operations and supply chainmanagement.” International Journal of Production Economics 120(1):252-269.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Chiu M., Fu C. and Wu I. (2013). An Analysis of Supply Chain Collaboration and Its Impact on Firm Performance - An Integration of Social Capital, Justice, and Technology Use . In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-8565-59-4, pages 5-12. DOI: 10.5220/0004400500050012


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis13,
author={Mai-Lun Chiu and Chu-Ying Fu and Ing-Long Wu},
title={An Analysis of Supply Chain Collaboration and Its Impact on Firm Performance - An Integration of Social Capital, Justice, and Technology Use},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS,},
year={2013},
pages={5-12},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004400500050012},
isbn={978-989-8565-59-4},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS,
TI - An Analysis of Supply Chain Collaboration and Its Impact on Firm Performance - An Integration of Social Capital, Justice, and Technology Use
SN - 978-989-8565-59-4
AU - Chiu M.
AU - Fu C.
AU - Wu I.
PY - 2013
SP - 5
EP - 12
DO - 10.5220/0004400500050012