A Bayesian Approach to FDD Combining Two Different Bayesian Networks Modeling a Data-Driven Method and a Model-based Method

Mohamed Amine Atoui, Sylvain Verron, Abdessamad Kobi

Abstract

In this paper, we present an original FDD method. The interest of this method is her ability to coexist residuals and measures, under a same and a single tool. Indeed, our proposal is to combine two different Bayesian networks to FDD. A model-based method is associated to a data-driven method to enhance decision making on the system operating state. This method is evaluated on a simulation of a water heater system in some various circumstances.

References

  1. Buntine, W. (1996). A guide to the literature on learning probabilistic networks from data.
  2. Chen, K., Wang, L., and Chi, H. (1997). Methods of combining multiple classifiers with different features and their applications to text-independent speaker identification. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 11:417-445.
  3. Chiang, L., Russel, E., and Braatz., R. (2001). Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems. Springer.
  4. Ding, S. (2008). Model-Based Fault diagnosis Techniques. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  5. Ding, S., Zhang, P., Naik, A., Ding, E., and Huang, B. (2009). Subspace method aided data-driven design of fault detection and isolation systems. Journal of Process Control, 19(9):1496 - 1510.
  6. Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., and Stork, D. G. (2001). pattern classification 2nd edition. Wiley.
  7. Friedman, N., Geiger, D., and Goldszmidt, M. (1997). Bayesian network classifiers. Machine Learning, 29:131-163.
  8. Fukunaga, K. (1990). Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition (2nd ed.). Academic Press Professional, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
  9. Ghosh, K., Ng, Y. S., and Srinivasan, R. (2011). Evaluation of decision fusion strategies for effective collaboration among heterogeneous fault diagnostic methods. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 35(2):342 - 355.
  10. Harkat, M.-F., Mourot, G., and Ragot, J. (2006). An improved pca scheme for sensor fdi: Application to an air quality monitoring network. Journal of Process Control, 16(6):625 - 634.
  11. Isermann, R. (2006). fault-diagnosis system. Springer, in robotics (vol. xviii) edition.
  12. Jensen, F. (1996). An Introduction to Bayesian Networks. Taylor and Francis, London, United Kingdom, London, United Kingdom.
  13. Luo, J., Namburu, S. M., Pattipati, K. R., Qiao, L., and Chigusa, S. (2010). Integrated model-based and datadriven diagnosis of automotive antilock braking systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A, 40(2):321-336.
  14. MacGregor, J. and Kourti, T. (1995). Statistical process control of multivariate processes. Control Engineering Practice, 3(3):403 - 414.
  15. Overschee, P. V. and Moor, B. D. (1996). Subspace Identification for linear systems: Theory - Implementation - Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  16. Qin, S. J. (2006). An overview of subspace identification. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 30:1502 - 1513.
  17. Schubert, U., Kruger, U., Arellano-Garcia, H., de Sa Feital, T., and Wozny, G. (2011). Unified model-based fault diagnosis for three industrial application studies. Control Engineering Practice, 19(5):479 - 490.
  18. Steinwart, I. and Christmann, A. (2008). Support Vector Machines. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 1st edition.
  19. Venkatasubramanian, V., Rengaswamy, R., Kavuri, S. N., and Yin, K. (2003). A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part iii: Process history based methods. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 27(3):327 - 346.
  20. Verron, S., Tiplica, T., and Kobi, A. (2007). Multivariate control charts with a bayesian network. In 4th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (ICINCO'07), pages 228-233.
  21. Verron, S., Weber, P., Theilliol, D., Tiplica, T., Kobi, A., and Aubrun, C. (2009). Decision with bayesian network in the concurrent faults event. In 7th IFAC Symposium on Fault Detection, Supervision and Safety of Technical Processes (SafeProcess'09).
  22. Weber, P., Theilliol, D., and Aubrun, C. (2008). Component Reliability in Fault Diagnosis Decision-Making based on Dynamic Bayesian Networks. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability, 222(2):161-172.
  23. Xu, L., Krzyzak, A., and Suen, C. Y. (1992). Methods of combining multiple classifiers and their applications to handwriting recognition. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22(3):418-435.
  24. Yew, S. N. and Rajagopalan, S. (2010). Multi-agent based collaborative fault detection and identification in chemical processes. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 23(6):934 - 949.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Amine Atoui M., Verron S. and Kobi A. (2013). A Bayesian Approach to FDD Combining Two Different Bayesian Networks Modeling a Data-Driven Method and a Model-based Method . In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 2: ICINCO, ISBN 978-989-8565-71-6, pages 162-168. DOI: 10.5220/0004432101620168


in Bibtex Style

@conference{icinco13,
author={Mohamed Amine Atoui and Sylvain Verron and Abdessamad Kobi},
title={A Bayesian Approach to FDD Combining Two Different Bayesian Networks Modeling a Data-Driven Method and a Model-based Method},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 2: ICINCO,},
year={2013},
pages={162-168},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004432101620168},
isbn={978-989-8565-71-6},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 2: ICINCO,
TI - A Bayesian Approach to FDD Combining Two Different Bayesian Networks Modeling a Data-Driven Method and a Model-based Method
SN - 978-989-8565-71-6
AU - Amine Atoui M.
AU - Verron S.
AU - Kobi A.
PY - 2013
SP - 162
EP - 168
DO - 10.5220/0004432101620168