PRONTOE - A Case Study for Developing Ontologies for Operations

Scott Bell, Pete Bonasso, Mark Boddy, David Kortenkamp, Debra Schreckenghost

Abstract

In this paper, we describe a set of software tools called the PRIDE ONTOlogy Editor (PRONTOE) and a methodology that allows system operators and domain experts to build and maintain ontologies of their systems with no explicit understanding of the underlying ontology representation. We present two case studies: one using NASA flight controllers, and another using the DARPA Robotic Challenge.

References

  1. Bell, S. and Kortenkamp, D. (2011). Embedding procedure assistance into mission control tools. In Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on AI in Space.
  2. Cardoso, J. (2007). The semantic web vision: Where are we? IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22(5):84-88.
  3. Elsaesser, C. and Sanborn, J. (1990). An architecture for adversarial planning. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 20(1).
  4. Fox, M. and Long, D. (2003). PDDL2.1: An extension to PDDL for expressing temporal planning domains. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 20:61- 124.
  5. Herzig, A. and Varzincak, I. (2007). Metatheory of action: Beyond consistency. Artificial Intelligence, 171:951- 984.
  6. Izygon, M., Kortenkamp, D., and Molin, A. (2008). A procedure integrated development environment for future spacecraft and habitats. In Proceedings of the Space Technology and Applications International Forum (STAIF). Available as American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings Volume 969.
  7. Kortenkamp, D., Bonasso, R. P., and Schreckenghost, D. (2008). A procedure representation language for human spaceflight operations. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (i-SAIRAS).
  8. Lopez, F. M. (1999). Overview of methodologies for building ontologies. In Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods.
  9. Myers, K. (2000). Domain metatheories: Enabling usercentric planning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Representational Issues for Real-World Planning Systems (AAAI Technical Report WS-00-07).
  10. Norman, D. (1998). The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books.
  11. Soares, A. and Fonseca, F. (2009). Building ontologies for information systems: What we have, what we need. In Proceedings of iConference.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Bell S., Bonasso P., Boddy M., Kortenkamp D. and Schreckenghost D. (2013). PRONTOE - A Case Study for Developing Ontologies for Operations . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development - Volume 1: KEOD, (IC3K 2013) ISBN 978-989-8565-81-5, pages 17-25. DOI: 10.5220/0004520500170025


in Bibtex Style

@conference{keod13,
author={Scott Bell and Pete Bonasso and Mark Boddy and David Kortenkamp and Debra Schreckenghost},
title={PRONTOE - A Case Study for Developing Ontologies for Operations},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development - Volume 1: KEOD, (IC3K 2013)},
year={2013},
pages={17-25},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004520500170025},
isbn={978-989-8565-81-5},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development - Volume 1: KEOD, (IC3K 2013)
TI - PRONTOE - A Case Study for Developing Ontologies for Operations
SN - 978-989-8565-81-5
AU - Bell S.
AU - Bonasso P.
AU - Boddy M.
AU - Kortenkamp D.
AU - Schreckenghost D.
PY - 2013
SP - 17
EP - 25
DO - 10.5220/0004520500170025