Demo-based Cost Model

Marco Arede, Carlos Mendes, Miguel Mira da Silva

Abstract

The complexity of organizations has become difficult to manage and organizations have lost the traceability between their essential transactions and the respective implementation costs. Most organizations do not have a coherent, comprehensive and consistent vision of the costs directly or indirectly related to the organization essential operations. This essential operations are based on networks of subjects that interact in order to coordinate and perform work, contributing for global performance. The lack of understanding of where costs occur leads to difficulties when taking decisions, limiting what can be achieved in a planned way, reason for the need of a properly cost analyses. A solution could contribute to a better understanding of where costs occur, providing managers with more information to support their decisions, so they can improve organizations in order to be more profitable. In our research we propose a DEMO-based Cost Model to address this problem, which intends to reduce the complexity of analysing costs, mapping the implementation costs with the essence of organizations. Our proposal allows analysing costs from different perspectives, by act, actor role, transaction and business process. The demonstration was applied to Invoice Management of a research and development unit. This research was conducted using DSRM.

References

  1. Association of Chartered Certified Accountants & Institute of Management, Finance leaders survey report: December 2012, viewed April 2013, <http://www.imanet.org/PDFs/Public/Research/pol-af b-fls01.pdf>.
  2. Blocher, E., 2005, Cost Management: A strategic emphasys, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, viewed 2005.
  3. BusinessBalls, Business Process Modelling History, viewed April 2013, <http://www.businessballs.com/ business-process-modelling.htm>.
  4. Chinosi, & Trombetta, A., 2012, 'BPMN: An introduction to the standard', Computer Standards & Interfaces, vol 34, pp. 124--134.
  5. Cross, R. & Parker, A., 2004, The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations, Harvard Business School Press.
  6. Dietz, J., 2003, 'Generic recurrent patterns in business processes', Business Process Management, pp. 200-- 215.
  7. Dietz, J., 2006, Enterprise Ontology: Theory and Methodology, Springer.
  8. e3value, The e3value methodology: Exploring innovative e-business ideas, viewed April 2013, <http://e3value.few.vu.nl/e3family/e3value/>.
  9. Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H. & Vliet, V., 2001, 'Designing and evaluating e-business models', IEEE intelligent Systems, vol 16, pp. 11--17.
  10. Hevner & March, S 2004, 'Design Science in Information Systems Research', MIS Quarterly, vol 28, pp. 75-- 105.
  11. Kaplan , R & Porter, , Why Medical Bills Are a Mystery, viewed May 2013, <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/ 04/15/opinion/sunday/why-medical-bills-are-a-myster y.html?_r=3&>.
  12. Kaplan, R & Anderson, S 2007, Time-Driven Activity Based Costing, Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.
  13. Kaplan, R. & Anderson, S., 2007, Time-Driven ActivityBased Costing: A simpler and more powerful path to higher profits, Harvard Business School Press.
  14. Management and Technology Consultancy, B 2013, Spend Management: Key Elements for Realising Cost Savings in Procurement, <http://www.bearingpoint. com/en-other/download/Spend_Mgmt_WP_FI_8p.pdf >.
  15. Moody L., & Shanks, G., 2003, 'Improving the quality of data models: empirical validation of a quality management framework', Information Systems, vol 28, pp. 619--650.
  16. Muehlen, M., 2008, 'Getting started with business process modeling', IIR BPM Conference, Orlando, Florida.
  17. Nuffel, Mulder & Kervel, 2009, 'Enhancing the formal Foundations of BPMN by Enterprise Ontology', Advances in Enterprise Engineering III, 2009, pp. 115--129.
  18. Osterle, H., 2010, 'Memorandum on design-oriented information systems research', European Journal of Information Systems, vol 20, pp. 7-10.
  19. Pesonen, L., 2001, Implementation of design to profit in a complex and dynamic business context, viewed April 2013, <http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9514264509/isbn95 14264509.pdf>.
  20. Pries-Heje, J., 2004, 'Strategies for Design Science Research Evaluation', 16th European Conference on Information System (ECIS).
  21. Ray, L., 2013, Overhead Costs in a Service Industry, <http://smallbusiness.chron.com/overhead-costs-servic e-industry-20984.html>.
  22. Richardson, K., 2008, 'Managing complex organizations: Complexity thinking and the science and art of management', Emergence, vol 10, pp. 13--26.
  23. Roberts, & Silvester, K. J., 1996, Why ABC failed and how it may yet succeed, viewed April 2013, <http://maaw.info/ArticleSummaries/ArtSumRoberts9 6.htm>.
  24. Schapper, J., Cieri, H. & Cox, J., 2005, The Ontological and Epistemologicla Dimensions of Complex Organisations.
  25. Scheer, A. W., 2000, ARIS: business process modeling.
  26. Tuunanen, T, Rothenberger, M & Chatterjee, K 2008, 'A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research', Journal of Management Information Systems, vol 24, pp. 45--77.
  27. Weinberg, G 2001, An Introduction to General Systems Thinking, Dorset House Publishing.
  28. Weinberg, G. M., 2001, An Introduction to General Systems Thinking, Dorset House Publishing.
  29. WFMC 1999, Workflow Management Coalition - Terminology and Glossary, viewed May 2013, <http://www.wfmc.org/standards/docs/TC-1011_term _glossary_v3.pdf>.
  30. Wileman, A., 2008, Driving Down Cost: How to Manage and Cut Costs - Intelligently, Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Arede M., Mendes C. and Mira da Silva M. (2013). Demo-based Cost Model . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development - Volume 1: SSEO, (IC3K 2013) ISBN 978-989-8565-81-5, pages 431-441. DOI: 10.5220/0004656204310441


in Bibtex Style

@conference{sseo13,
author={Marco Arede and Carlos Mendes and Miguel Mira da Silva},
title={Demo-based Cost Model},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development - Volume 1: SSEO, (IC3K 2013)},
year={2013},
pages={431-441},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004656204310441},
isbn={978-989-8565-81-5},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development - Volume 1: SSEO, (IC3K 2013)
TI - Demo-based Cost Model
SN - 978-989-8565-81-5
AU - Arede M.
AU - Mendes C.
AU - Mira da Silva M.
PY - 2013
SP - 431
EP - 441
DO - 10.5220/0004656204310441