A Web-based System to Support Inquiry Learning - Towards Determining How Much Assistance Students Need

Bruce M. McLaren, Michael Timms, Doug Weihnacht, Daniel Brenner, Kim Luttgen, Andrew Grillo-Hill, David H. Brown

2014

Abstract

How much assistance should be provided to students as they learn with educational technology? Providing help allows students to proceed when struggling, yet can depress their motivation to learn independently. Assistance withholding encourages students to learn for themselves, yet can also lead to frustration. The web-based inquiry-learning program, \emph{Voyage to Galapagos (VTG)}, helps students ``follow’’ the steps of Darwin through a simulation of the Galapagos Island and his discovery of evolution. Students explore the islands, take pictures of animals, evaluate their characteristics and behavior, and use scientific methodology to discover evolution. A preliminary study with 48 middle school students examined three levels of assistance: (1) no support, (2) error flagging, text feedback on errors, and hints, and (3) pre-emptive hints with error flagging, error feedback, and hints. The results indicate that higher performing students gainfully use the program’s support more frequently than lower performing students, those who arguably have a greater need for it. We conjecture that this could be a product of the current \emph{VTG} program only supporting an early phase of the learning process and also that higher performers have better metacognition, particularly in knowing when (and when not) to ask for help. Lower performers may benefit at later phases of the program, which we will test in a future study.

References

  1. AAAS (2011). Project 2061: AAAS Science Assessment. AAAS: Advancing Science, Serving Society. http://assessment.aaas.org/
  2. Aleven, V., McLaren, B., Roll, I., & Koedinger, K. (2006). Toward meta-cognitive tutoring: A model of help seeking with a cognitive tutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 16(2), 101-128.
  3. Alters, B. (2005). Teaching Biological Evolution in Higher Education: Methodological, Religious, and Nonreligious Issues. Sudbury, Mass.: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
  4. Alters, B. and Nelson, C. E. (2002). Teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution, 56(10), 1891-1901.
  5. Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M., & Norman, G. J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 952-978.
  6. Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), 415-427.
  7. Borek, A., McLaren, B.M., Karabinos, M., & Yaron, D. (2009). How much assistance is helpful to students in discovery learning? In U. Cress, V. Dimitrova, & M. Specht (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, Learning in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines (ECTEL 2009), LNCS 5794, September/October 2009, Nice, France. (pp. 391-404). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
  8. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (2000). How People Learn. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
  9. DeJong, T. & van Joolingen W. R. (1998). Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179-201.
  10. Dragon, T., Mavrikis, M., McLaren, B. M., Harrer, A., Kynigos, C., Wegerif, R., & Yang, Y. (2013). Metafora: A web-based platform for learning to learn together in science and mathematics. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 6(3), 197-207 July-Sept. 2013.
  11. Edelson, D. (2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38(3), 355- 385.
  12. Geier, R., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., et al. (2008). Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry-based science curricula in the context of urban reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8) 922- 939.
  13. Kapur, M. (2009). Productive failure in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science. doi: 10.1007/s11251-009-9093-x.
  14. Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., and Clark, R.E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 75-86.
  15. Klahr, D. & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12, 1-48.
  16. Klahr, D. (2009). “To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heavens”; What about direct instruction? In S. Tobias and T. M. Duffy (Eds.) Constructivist Theory Applied to Instruction: Success or Failure? Taylor and Francis.
  17. Koedinger, K. R. and Aleven, V. (2007). Exploring the assistance dilemma in experiments with cognitive tutors. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 239-264.
  18. Lane, E. (2011). U.S. Students and Science: AAAS Testing Gives New Insight on What They Know and Their Misconceptions. AAAS: Advancing Science, Serving Society http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2011/0407p2061_a ssessment.shtml.
  19. Linn, M. C. and Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, Teachers, Peers: Science Learning Partners. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  20. Mayer, R. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 14-19.
  21. Mulder, Y. G., Lazonder, A. W. & de Jong, T. (2010). Finding Out How They Find It Out: An empirical analysis of inquiry learners' need for support. International Journal of Science Education. 32(15), 1971-1988.
  22. Paas, F.G., Renkl, A., and Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1-4.
  23. Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R.G. et al. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 337-387.
  24. Sandoval, W. A. and Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanationdriven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 345-372.
  25. Slotta, J. (2004). The web-based inquiry science environment (WISE): Scaffolding knowledge integration in the science classroom. In: M. Linn, E.A. Davis, & P. Bell (Eds), Internet environments for science education (pp. 203-233). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  26. Sulloway, F. J. (1982). Darwin's conversion: The Beagle voyage and its aftermath. Journal of the History of Biology, 15(3), 325-396.
  27. Tsovaltzi, D., Rummel, N., McLaren, B. M., Pinkwart, N., Scheuer, O., Harrer, A. and Braun, I. (2010). Extending a virtual chemistry laboratory with a collaboration script to promote conceptual learning. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(1/2), 91-110.
  28. van Joolingen, W. R., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Savelsbergh, E., and Manlove, S. (2005). Co-Lab: Research and development of an on-line learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 671-688.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

M. McLaren B., Timms M., Weihnacht D., Brenner D., Luttgen K., Grillo-Hill A. and H. Brown D. (2014). A Web-based System to Support Inquiry Learning - Towards Determining How Much Assistance Students Need . In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-020-8, pages 43-52. DOI: 10.5220/0004810100430052


in Bibtex Style

@conference{csedu14,
author={Bruce M. McLaren and Michael Timms and Doug Weihnacht and Daniel Brenner and Kim Luttgen and Andrew Grillo-Hill and David H. Brown},
title={A Web-based System to Support Inquiry Learning - Towards Determining How Much Assistance Students Need},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,},
year={2014},
pages={43-52},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004810100430052},
isbn={978-989-758-020-8},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,
TI - A Web-based System to Support Inquiry Learning - Towards Determining How Much Assistance Students Need
SN - 978-989-758-020-8
AU - M. McLaren B.
AU - Timms M.
AU - Weihnacht D.
AU - Brenner D.
AU - Luttgen K.
AU - Grillo-Hill A.
AU - H. Brown D.
PY - 2014
SP - 43
EP - 52
DO - 10.5220/0004810100430052