A Technology Enhanced Assessment System for Skill and Knowledge Learning

Enosha Hettiarachchi, Enric Mor, Maria Antonia Huertas, M. Elena Rodríguez

Abstract

This paper presents a technology-enhanced assessment system that can be used for both skill and knowledge learning. For this purpose, a general technology-enhanced assessment system is designed and developed for an online logic course at a fully online university, taking into account e-learning standards and specifications, which can be easily adapted to any institute and subject requiring a high level of skill learning. Through this system, both learning and formative assessment facilities are provided to students. To evaluate its effects on student learning process, the system is applied in a real logic course at the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC). Based on the evaluation, it shows that students’ are more engaged with the system and, as a result, their performance in the subject had improved. Also, based on the feedback obtained through the evaluation, it shows that students are satisfied with the facilities and assessments provided by the system. Overall, the introduction of the technology-enhanced assessment system for skill and knowledge learning has yielded some interesting results.

References

  1. Bevan, N., 2003. UsabilityNet Methods for User Centred Design. Human-Computer Interaction: Theory and Practice (Part 1), Proceedings of HCI International, 1, 434 - 438.
  2. Bull, J., & Mckenna, C., 2004. Blueprint for ComputerAssisted Assessment (Vol. 2). RoutledgeFalmer, London.
  3. Cook, J., & Jenkins, V., 2010. Getting Started with EAssessment. Bath. Available at: <http://opus. bath.ac.uk/17712/> [Accessed on 31 January 2014]
  4. Crisp, G., 2007. The e-Assessment Handbook. Continuum International Publishing Group, London.
  5. Crisp, G., 2009. Interactive E-Assessment: Moving Beyond Multiple-Choice Questions. Centre for Learning and Professional Development. Adelaide: University of Adelaide.
  6. Crisp, G., 2010. Interactive E-Assessment - Practical Approaches to Constructing More Sophisticated Online Tasks. Journal of Learning Design, 3 (3), 1 - 10.
  7. Daly, C., Pachler, N., Mor, Y., & Mellar, H., 2010. Exploring Formative E-Assessment: Using Case Stories and Design Patterns. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (5), 619 - 636.
  8. de Bruyn, E., Mostert, E., & Schoor, A., 2011. Computerbased Testing - The Ideal Tool to Assess on the Different Levels of Bloom's Taxonomy. In 14th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL2011), 444 - 449.
  9. Dostalova, L., & Lang, J., 2007. ORGANON The Web Tutor for Basic Logic Courses. Logic Journal of IGPL, 15 (4), 305 - 311.
  10. Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C., 2004. Conditions Under Which Assessment Supports Students' Learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1 (1), 3 - 31.
  11. Gruttmann, S., Böhm, D., & Kuchen, H., 2008. Eassessment of Mathematical Proofs: Chances and Challenges for Students and Tutors. International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (IEEE), 612 - 615.
  12. Hettiarachchi, E., Huertas, M. & Pera, E., 2013. “Skill and Knowledge E-Assessment: A Review of the State of the Art” [online working paper]. (Working Paper Series; WP00-000). IN3 Working Paper Series. IN3 (UOC). In press.
  13. Hettiarachchi, E., Huertas, M. A., Pera, E. M., & Guerrero-Roldan, A. E., 2012. An Architecture for Technology-Enhanced Assessment of High Level Skill Practice. In 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 38-39. IEEE.
  14. Huertas, A., 2011. Ten Years of Computer-based Tutors for Teaching Mathematical Logic 2000-2010: Lessons Learned. In P. Blackburn et al. (Ed.): Third International Congress on Tools for Teaching Mathematical logic (TICTTL 2011), LNAI 6680, 131 - 140. Springer, Heidelberg.
  15. Huertas, A., Humet, J. M., López, L., & Mor, E., 2011. The SELL Project: A Learning Tool for E-Learning Logic. Learning and Instruction, 6680/2011, 123 -130.
  16. Imperial College London, 2013. Pandora IV. Available at: <http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/pandora/newpandora/index. html> [Accessed on 31 January 2014]
  17. IMS GLC, 2013. Learning Tools Interoperability. Available at: <http://www.imsproject.org/lti> [Accessed on 31 January 2014]
  18. JISC, 2007. Effective Practice with e-Assessment: An Overview of Technologies, Policies and Practice in Further and Higher Education. Available at: <http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/themes/elear ning/effpraceassess.pdf> [Accessed on 31 January 2014]
  19. Jordan, S., 2009. Assessment for Learning : Pushing the Boundaries of Computer-Based Assessment. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 3 (1), 11 - 19.
  20. Krishnamurthy, A. and O'Connor, R., 2013. An Analysis of the Software Development Processes of Open Source E-Learning Systems, Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 60-71.
  21. Majchrzak, T. A., & Usener, C. A., 2011. Evaluating the Synergies of Integrating E-Assessment and Software Testing. In Proceedings of Information Systems Development Conference (ISD2011). Springer, 2011.
  22. Marriott, P., 2009. Students' Evaluation of the use of Online Summative Assessment on an Undergraduate Financial Accounting Module. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40 (2), 237 - 254.
  23. McAlpine, M., 2002. Principles of assessment. CAA Centre, University of Luton.
  24. OAuth, 2013. OAuth - Getting Started. Available at: <http://oauth.net/documentation/getting-started/> [Accessed on 31 January 2014]
  25. Pachler, N., Daly, C., Mor, Y., & Mellar, H., 2010. Formative E-Assessment: Practitioner Cases. Computers & Education, 54 (3), 715 - 721.
  26. Sadler, D. R. (2013). Opening up feedback. Reconceptualising Feedback in Higher Education: Developing Dialogue with Students, 54.
  27. Sitthiworachart, J., Joy, M., & Sutinen, E., 2008. Success Factors for E-Assessment in Computer Science Education. In C. Bonk et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 2287 - 2293.
  28. Tselonis, C., & Sargeant, J., 2007. Domain-specific Formative Feedback through Domain-independent Diagram Matching. In F. Khandia (Ed.), 11th CAA International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, 403 - 420. Loughborough, UK: Loughborough University.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Hettiarachchi E., Mor E., Antonia Huertas M. and Elena Rodríguez M. (2014). A Technology Enhanced Assessment System for Skill and Knowledge Learning . In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-021-5, pages 184-191. DOI: 10.5220/0004845601840191


in Bibtex Style

@conference{csedu14,
author={Enosha Hettiarachchi and Enric Mor and Maria Antonia Huertas and M. Elena Rodríguez},
title={A Technology Enhanced Assessment System for Skill and Knowledge Learning},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,},
year={2014},
pages={184-191},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004845601840191},
isbn={978-989-758-021-5},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,
TI - A Technology Enhanced Assessment System for Skill and Knowledge Learning
SN - 978-989-758-021-5
AU - Hettiarachchi E.
AU - Mor E.
AU - Antonia Huertas M.
AU - Elena Rodríguez M.
PY - 2014
SP - 184
EP - 191
DO - 10.5220/0004845601840191