The Response Systems in the Student’s Learning/Teaching Process - A Case Study in a Portuguese School

Paula Azevedo, Maria João Ferreira

Abstract

Over the past few years there has been a large investment in information and communication technologies applied in the teaching/learning process. In this context the response systems appear as an innovative tool associated with different methods and strategies. Response systems are technological products designed to support communication and interactivity, generating enormous potential when applied in the teaching/learning process. The student motivation increases when this technology is used leading to a greater participation and consequently to a better and faster acquisition of concepts. Collaborative and cooperative attitudes between student/student, student/teacher and student/class are increased when response system are used in the context of the classroom. The use of response systems and their implications for the teaching/learning process are some of the challenges that teachers are facing nowadays as a driving agent in the implementation of this technology at school. This article examines the use of response systems in the student’s learning/teaching process, exploring their use in a Portuguese school.

References

  1. Arends, R., 2008. Aprender a ensinar. Mcgrawhill.
  2. Azevedo, P., 2012. Os sistemas de resposta no processo ensino/aprendizagem do estudante. Dissertação de mestrado. Porto: Universidade Portucalense.
  3. Barber, M., Njus, D., 2007. Special feature?: clicker reviews. Clicker evolution: seeking intelligent design. Life sciences education.
  4. Barrett, M., Bornsen, S., Erickson, S., Markey, V., Spiering, K., 2005. The personal response system as a teaching aid. Routledge.
  5. Beatty, I., 2004. Transforming student learning with classroom communication systems. Educause center for applied research (ECAR).
  6. Beatty, I., Gerace, W., Leonard, W., Dufresne, R., 2005. Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching. American journal of physics.
  7. Beatty, I., Gerace, W., 2009. Technology-enhanced formative assessment: a research-based pedagogy for teaching science with classroom response technology. Journal of science education and technology.
  8. Caldwell, J., 2007. Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice. Life sciences education.
  9. Costello, P., 2010. A cost-effective classroom response system. British journal of educational technology.
  10. Coutinho, C., 2005. Metodologia de investigação em ciências sociais e humanas: teoria e prática. Edições almedina.
  11. Eastman, J., 2007. Enhancing classroom communication with interactive technology: how faculty can get started. College teaching, methods & styles journal.
  12. Eastman, J., Iyer, R., Eastman, K., 2011. Business students' perceptions, attitudes, and satisfaction with interactive technology: an exploratory study. Journal of education for business.
  13. Edens, K., 2006. The interaction of pedagogical and goal orientation using student response system technology. Journal of research on technology in education.
  14. Fies, C., Marshall, J., 2006. Classroom response systems: a review of the literature. Journal of science education and technology.
  15. Gable, R., Wolf, M. 1986. Instrument development in the affective domain: measuring attitudes and values in corporate and school settings. Boston: Kluwer academic publishers.
  16. Hancock, T., 2010. Use of audience response system for summative assessment in large classes. Australasian journal of educational technology.
  17. Hill, M., Hill, A., 2005. Investigação por questionário. Lisboa: sílabo.
  18. Judson, E., Sawada, D., 2006. Audience response systems: insipid contrivances or inspiring tools? In audience response systems in higher education: applications and cases. Hershey: information science publishing.
  19. Kay, R., Knaack, L., 2009. Exploring the use of audience response systems in secondary school science classrooms. Journal of science education and technology.
  20. Kay, R., Lesage, A., 2009. Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response system: a review of the literature. Computers & education.
  21. Kennedy, G., Cutts, Q., 2005.The association between students' use of an electronic voting system and their learning outcomes. Journal of computer assisted learning.
  22. Kenwright, K., 2009. Clickers in the classroom. Tech trends journal.
  23. Kolikant, Y., Drane, D., Calkins, S., 2010. “Clickers” as catalysts for transformation of teachers. College teaching.
  24. Lebrun, M., 2008. Teorias e métodos pedagógicos para ensinar e aprender. Instituto piaget.
  25. Liu, N., 2010. How to effectively use SRS in the elementary classroom. In: 14th annual technology colleges and community worldwide online conference.
  26. Lowery, R., 2005. Teaching and learning with interactive student response systems: a comparison of commercial products in the higher-education market. In: Annual meeting of the Southwestern Social Science Association and its affiliates, New Orleans.
  27. Morgan, J., 2008. Click or clack: what is all the noise about SRSs?. Edu 6606.
  28. Penuel, W., Boscardin, C. Masyn, K., Crawford, V., 2007. Teaching with student response systems in elementary and secondary education settings: a survey study. Educational technology research and development.
  29. Roberson, P., 2009. Testing student response systems. Education today.
  30. Shaffer, D., Collura, M., 2009. Evaluating the effectiveness of a personal response system in the classroom. Teaching of psychology.
  31. Siau, K. Sheng, H., Nah, F., 2006. Use of a classroom response system to enhance classroom interactivity. IEEE transactions on education.
  32. Simpson, V., Oliver, M., 2007. Electronic voting system for lectures then and now: a comparison of research and practice. Australian journal of education technology.
  33. Tuckman, B., 2000. Manual de investigação em educação. Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
  34. Zhu, E., 2007. Teaching with clickers. Center for research on learning and teaching.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Azevedo P. and Ferreira M. (2014). The Response Systems in the Student’s Learning/Teaching Process - A Case Study in a Portuguese School . In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-758-029-1, pages 79-86. DOI: 10.5220/0004874700790086


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis14,
author={Paula Azevedo and Maria João Ferreira},
title={The Response Systems in the Student’s Learning/Teaching Process - A Case Study in a Portuguese School},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2014},
pages={79-86},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004874700790086},
isbn={978-989-758-029-1},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - The Response Systems in the Student’s Learning/Teaching Process - A Case Study in a Portuguese School
SN - 978-989-758-029-1
AU - Azevedo P.
AU - Ferreira M.
PY - 2014
SP - 79
EP - 86
DO - 10.5220/0004874700790086