Managing Distributed Software Development with Performance Measures

Guilherme Sperandio dos Santos, Renato Balancieri, Gislaine Camila L. Leal, Elisa Hatsue M. Huzita, Edwin Cardoza

Abstract

The Distributed Software Development (DSD) has been increasingly adopted for providing advantages over traditional software development. But this approach presents some challenges such as communication difficulties, cultural differences among the involved and low proximity among developers. This paper presents a set of performance measures for management through five perspectives: financial, customer, internal processes and, learning and growth, based on Balanced Scorecard (BSC).The fifth perspective, geographical dispersion, has been proposed as an extension of the BSC System for DSD projects. The performance perspectives aim measure and to support the decision making process of stakeholders through metrics related to the attributes of quality, productivity, cost, time and geographic dispersion, fundamental in the software project management. So, the performance measures are a mechanism to evaluate the return on financial investment, the satisfaction of customers and employees, the performance of processes running on the DSD, the continuous improvement of the organization and the success of the geographical dispersion.

References

  1. Bititci, U. S. et al., 1997. Integrated performance measurement systems: a development guide, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17, 5, 522 - 534.
  2. Edvinsson, L., Malone, M. S., 1998. Intellectual Capital. São Paulo: Makron Books (Portuguese).
  3. Huzita, E. H. M., Leal, G. C. L., Balancieri, R., Tait, T. F. C., Cardoza, E., Penteado, R. R. M., Vivian, R. L., 2012. Knowledge and Contextual Information Management in Global Software Development: Challenges and Perspectives. In: 2012 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Global Software Engineering Workshops, 43-48.
  4. IEEE Computer Society, 2004.Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge -SWEBOK.
  5. Jimenez, M., Piattini, M., Vizcano, A., 2009. A Challenges and Improvements in Distributed Software Development: A Systematic Review. Advances in Software Engineering. January 2009. doi:10.1155/ 2009/710971.
  6. Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. Y., 2004.A Review of Metrics for Knowledge Management Systems and Knowledge Management Initiatives. In: 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - 2004. 8p.
  7. Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P., 1992.The Balanced Scorecard - Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, (January-February): 71-79.
  8. Kazi, L., Radulovic, B., Kazi, Z., 2012. Performance Indicators in Software Project Monitoring: Balanced Scorecard Approach. IEEE 10th Jubilee International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics - September 2012, Subotica, Serbia. University of Novi Sad, Technical faculty “Mihajlo Pupin”, Zrenjanin, Serbia., 23-24.
  9. Marçal, C. A. M., 2008. Assessment of Business Performance: the next step for the implementation of the Management System. Dissertation of FGV, 136 p (Portuguese).
  10. Norreklit, H. 2000. The Balance on the balanced scorecard - a critical analysis of some of its assumptions. Management Accounting Research, London, v.11, n.1, p.65-88, Mar.
  11. Parviainen, M. T., Kommeren, R., Rotherham, J., 2012.Metrics and Measurements in Global Software Development. International Journal on Advances in Software, 5, 3 and 4, 284-288.
  12. PMBOK 2004. Project Management Body of Knowledge Guide. Project Management Institute (PMI) Publishing Division.
  13. Ramasubbu, N., Cataldo, M., Balan, R. K.,Herbsleb, J. D., 2011.Configuring Global Software Teams: A MultiCompany Analysis of Project Productivity, Quality, and Profits, ACM Digital Library, ICSE, pp.4.
  14. Schneiderman, A.M. 1999. Why balanced scorecards fail. Journal of Strategic Performance Measurement, New York, p.6-10, Jan. Special Edition.
  15. Siqueira, F. L., Silva, P. S. M., 2004. The Characteristics of Distributed Software Development. In: Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas de Informação, Porto Alegre, 1-2 (Portuguese).
  16. Santos, G. S.; Galdamez, E. V. C. Management of Organizational Performance in Distributed Software Development. Technical Report, 2013, 54p (Portuguese).
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Sperandio dos Santos G., Balancieri R., Camila L. Leal G., Huzita E. and Cardoza E. (2014). Managing Distributed Software Development with Performance Measures . In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-758-028-4, pages 307-314. DOI: 10.5220/0004895703070314


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis14,
author={Guilherme Sperandio dos Santos and Renato Balancieri and Gislaine Camila L. Leal and Elisa Hatsue M. Huzita and Edwin Cardoza},
title={Managing Distributed Software Development with Performance Measures},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS,},
year={2014},
pages={307-314},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004895703070314},
isbn={978-989-758-028-4},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS,
TI - Managing Distributed Software Development with Performance Measures
SN - 978-989-758-028-4
AU - Sperandio dos Santos G.
AU - Balancieri R.
AU - Camila L. Leal G.
AU - Huzita E.
AU - Cardoza E.
PY - 2014
SP - 307
EP - 314
DO - 10.5220/0004895703070314