The Virtual Design Workshop - An Online Adaptive Resource for Teaching Design in Engineering

Alexandra Vassar, B. Gangadhara Prusty, Nadine Marcus, Robin Ford

Abstract

Design education aims to develop in students the confidence to apply engineering fundamentals to the design of products and systems. This can only be achieved through intensive education and exposure to real-life engineering problems. One of the pressing issues in teaching engineering design is the resources- and labour-intensive nature of the subject. In practice, when developing a design, engineers are dependent on the situation at hand, so goals, problems and constraints are often ill defined and may change as the problem continues to unfold, providing no single ideal solution. Assumptions and estimations are required before each analysis step, and the results need to be evaluated against the desired functional output. Often, many analysis iterations are needed before a suitable solution is found. When teaching, providing the same scenario requires that tutorial guidance must adapt to the particular solution of each individual student. Conventional online tutorials help to combat some issues, but they are not able to track student progress in detail, nor are they able to provide customisable feedback for individual students. The aim of the research is to develop software tools that can address key problems in engineering design education and provide students with a more effective and enriching educational experience. This paper discusses a response to the issues in design education in engineering, in the form of adaptive tutorials, and puts forward the preliminary analysis of their success in helping students overcome the limitations of current design education.

References

  1. Álvarez-Caldas, C., García, J. L. S. R., Abella, B. M., & González, A. Q., 2007. Educational software to design shafts and analyze them by FEM. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 15(1), pp.99- 106.
  2. Baillie, C., Bowden, J. A. & Meyer, J., 2013. Threshold Capabilities: threshold concepts and knowledge capability linked through variation theory. Higher Education, 65(2), pp.227-246.
  3. Ben-Naim, D. & Prusty, B. G., 2010. Towards a Community of Practice Concerning the Use of Adaptive Tutorials in Engineering Mechanics. In Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference. Sydney, Australia.
  4. Ben-Naim, D., Bain, M. & Marcus, N., 2009. A UserDriven and Data-Driven Approach for Supporting Teachers in Reflection and Adaptation of Adaptive Tutorials. In T. Barnes et al., eds. Proceedings of Educational Data Mining 2009: 2nd International Conference on Educational Data Mining. Cordoba, Spain, pp. 21-30.
  5. Carroll, D. R., 1997. Integrating Design into the Sophomore and Junior Level Mechanics Courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(3), pp. 227-231.
  6. Dougherty, J. U. & Parfitt, M. K., 2006. Enhancing Architectural Engineering Capstone Design Courses Through Web-Based Technologies. Building Integration Solutions: pp.1-12.
  7. Dougherty, J. U. & Parfitt, M. K., 2009. Framework for Teaching Engineering Capstone Design Courses with Emphasis on Application of Internet-based Technologies. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 15(1), pp.4-9.
  8. Dutson, A. J., Todd, R. H. & Magleby, S. P., 1997. A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(1), pp. 17-28.
  9. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J., 2005. Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. Journal of Engineering Education 94(1), pp.103-120.
  10. Gibson, I. S., O'Reilly, C. & Hughes, M., 2002. Integration of ICT within a Project-based Learning Environment. European Journal of Engineering Education, 27(1), pp.21-30.
  11. Goldsmith, R., Reidsema, C., Beck, H., & Campbell, D., 2010. Perspectives on Teaching and Learning in Engineering Design Across Four Universities. Connected 2010 - International Conference on Design Education, pp.1-5.
  12. Heywood, J., 2005. Engineering education: Research and development in curriculum and instruction, John Wiley and Sons.
  13. Kartam, N. A., 1998. Integrating Design into a Civil Engineering Education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 14(2), pp.130-135.
  14. Khawaja, M. A., Prusty, G. B., Ford, R. A., Marcus, N., & Russell, C., 2013. Can More Become Less? Effects of an Intensive Assessment Environment on Students' Learning Performance. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(6), pp.631-651.
  15. Kolmos, A. 1996. Reflections on Project Work and Problem-based Learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 21(2), pp.141-148.
  16. Kurfess, T. R., 2003. Producing the Modern Engineer. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(1), pp. 118-123.
  17. Lemons, G., Carberry, A., Swan, C., Jarvin, L., & Rogers, C., 2010. The benefits of Model Building in Teaching Engineering Design. Design Studies, 31(3), pp.288- 309.
  18. Marcus, N., Ben-Naim, D. & Bain, M., 2011. Instructional Support for Teachers and Guided Feedback for Students in an Adaptive eLearning Environment. In Eighth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG).
  19. Noer, M., 2012. One Man, One Computer, 10 Million Students: How Khan Academy Is Reinventing Education - Forbes. forbes.com. Available at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelnoer/2012/11/02/ one-man-one-computer-10-million-students-howkhan-academy-is-reinventing-education/ [Accessed November 11, 2013].
  20. Perrenet, J. C., Bouhuijs, P. & Smits, J., 2000. The Suitability of Problem-based Learning for Engineering Education: Theory and Practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(3), pp.345-358.
  21. Prusty, B. G., 2011. Teaching and Assessing Threshold Concepts in Solid Mechanics using Adaptive Tutorials. In E. A. Fancello, P. T. R. Mendonca, & A. M, eds. Mechanics of Solids in Brazil. Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering.
  22. Prusty, B. G., 2010. Teaching and Assessment of Mechanics Courses in Engineering, Which Encourage and Motivate Students to Learn Threshold Concepts Effectively. In 3rd Biennial Threshold Concepts Symposium: Exploring transformative threshold concept. Sydney, Australia.
  23. Prusty, B. G. & Russell, C., 2011. Engaging Students in Learning Threshold Concepts in Engineering Mechanics: Adaptive eLearning Tutorials. In International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEE2011). Belfast, Australia.
  24. Khawaja, M. A. & Prusty, B. G., 2013. An Adaptive eLearning Community of Practice for Mechanics Courses in Engineering, Australia: Australian Government, Office for Learning and Teaching.
  25. Prusty, B. G., Ben-Naim, D., Ho, S., Ho, O., 2011a. Online Adaptive Tutorials Targeting Fundamental Concepts of Mechanics Courses in Engineering. In Engineering Education - An Australian Perspective. Multi-Science Publishing Co Ltd., Australia.
  26. Prusty, B. G., Ho, O. & Ho, S., 2009. Adaptive Tutorials Using eLearning Platform for Solid Mechanics Course in Engineering. In 20th Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference. University of Adelaide.
  27. Prusty, B. G., Russell, C., Ford, R., Ben-Naim, D., Ho, S., Vrcelj, Z., Marcus, N., & Hadgraft, R., 2011b. Adaptive Tutorials to target Threshold Concepts in Mechanics - a Community of Practice Approach. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference for the Australasian Association for Engineering Education. Freemantle WA, Australia, pp. 305-311.
  28. Ressler, S. J. & Ressler, E. K., 2004. Using a Nationwide Internet-Based Bridge Design Contest as a Vehicle for Engineering Outreach. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(2), pp.117-128.
  29. Sweller, J. & Cooper, G. A., 1985. The Use of Worked Examples as a Substitute for Problem Solving in Learning Algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2(1), pp.59-89.
  30. Symans, M. D., 2000. Introducing Middle School Students to Engineering Principles Using Educational Bridge Design Software. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(3), pp.273-278.
  31. Tan, F. L. & Fok, S. C., 2006. An Educational Computer aided Tool for Heat Exchanger Design. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 14(2), pp.77- 89.
  32. Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P. & Sorensen, C. D., 1995. A survey of capstone engineering courses in North America. Journal of Engineering Education, 84(2), pp.165-174.
  33. Wilczynski, V. & Douglas, S. M., 1995. Integrating Design Across the Engineering Curriculum: A Report from the Trenches, Journal of Engineering Education, 84(3), pp.235-240.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Vassar A., Prusty B., Marcus N. and Ford R. (2014). The Virtual Design Workshop - An Online Adaptive Resource for Teaching Design in Engineering . In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-020-8, pages 452-458. DOI: 10.5220/0004945204520458


in Bibtex Style

@conference{csedu14,
author={Alexandra Vassar and B. Gangadhara Prusty and Nadine Marcus and Robin Ford},
title={The Virtual Design Workshop - An Online Adaptive Resource for Teaching Design in Engineering},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,},
year={2014},
pages={452-458},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004945204520458},
isbn={978-989-758-020-8},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,
TI - The Virtual Design Workshop - An Online Adaptive Resource for Teaching Design in Engineering
SN - 978-989-758-020-8
AU - Vassar A.
AU - Prusty B.
AU - Marcus N.
AU - Ford R.
PY - 2014
SP - 452
EP - 458
DO - 10.5220/0004945204520458