Using Activity Theory in Developing Instructial Tools for Project Management Studies

Maritta Pirhonen

Abstract

Competence and skills of the project manager are significant to project success. The skills needed in project managers’ work cannot be learned only by reading the books or a lecture hall; one learns them by practice. Therefore, an important challenge for educational institutions is to develop pedagogical practices that allow students to participate in working life projects and to confront real-life problems. Project-based learning (PBL) offers a model that enables students to practice the skills and competences needed in working life projects by utilizing real-world work assignments in time-limited projects. Using PBL method alone does not necessarily guarantee learning result. In order to be successful, PBL method requires effective and competent supervision and guidance of students as well as appropriate tools for instruction. In this study the concepts from activity theory (AT) are applied to development tools for supervising project-based learning.

References

  1. Basharina, O. K. 2007. An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), 82-103.
  2. Cole, M. and Engeström, Y. 1993. A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.) Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  3. Engeström, Y. 1987. Learning by expanding: An activitytheoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-konsultit.
  4. Engeström, Y. 1990. Learning, working, and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki: Orientakonsultit.
  5. Engeström, Y., 1995. Objects, contradictions and collaboration in medical cognition: an activitytheoretical perspective. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 7 (5), 395-412.
  6. Engeström, Y., 2001. Expansive learning at work: towards an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156.
  7. de Graaff E. and Kolmos, A., 2003. Characteristics of problem-based learning, International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(5), 657-662.
  8. Helle, M. 2000. Disturbances and Contradictions as Tools for Understanding Work in the Newsroom, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12(1), 81-113.
  9. Helle, L., Tynjälä, P. and Olkinuora, E. 2006. Projectbased learning in post-secondary education - theory, practice and rubber sling shots. Higher Education, 51(2), 287-314.
  10. Helle, L., Tynjälä, P., Olkinuora, E. and Lonka K. 2007. 'Ain't nothing like a real thing'. Motivation and study processes on work-based project course in information systems design. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 397-411.
  11. Iacovou, C. L. and Dexter, A. S. 2004. Turning around runaway information technology projects. California Management Review, 46(4), 68-88.
  12. Kjersdam, F. 1994. Tomorrows Engineering Education - The Aalborg Experiment. Journal of Engineering Education, 19(2), 197-204.
  13. Kuutti, K. 1996. Activity Theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. Nardi (ed.) Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human Computer Interaction, MIT Press, Cambridge, 17-44.
  14. Moses, L., Fincher, S., Caristi J., 2000. Teams work (panel session) in Haller S. (ed.) Proceedings of the thirtyfirst SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 7-12. Austin, USA. New York: ACM Press, pp. 421-422.
  15. Müller, R. and Turner J. R. 2007. Matching the project manager's leadership style to project type. International Journal of Project Management, 25(1), 21-32.
  16. Pigford, D. V., 1992. The Documentation and Evaluation of Team-Oriented Database Projects. Proceedings of the twenty-third technical symposium on Computer science education, Kansas City, Missouri, United States. New York: ACM Press, pp. 28-33.
  17. Pirhonen, M. 2009. Challenges of Supervising Student Projects in Collaboration with Authentic Clients. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU) [CD-ROM], Lisbon, Portugal, May 23-26, 2009.
  18. Pirhonen, M. 2010. Learning Soft Skills in Project Management Course: Students Perceptions. In Aramo-Immonen, H., Naaranoja, M. and Toikka, T. (eds.) Proceedings of Project Knowledge Sharing Arena, Scientific Track Project Days 2010, 31-41.
  19. Roberts, E., 2000. Computing education and the information technology workforce. SIGCSE Bulletin (32)2, pp. 83-90.
  20. Smith, B., Dodds, R., 1997. Developing Managers Through Project-based Learning. Aldershot/Vermont: Gover.
  21. Tynjälä, P., Pirhonen, M., Vartiainen, T. and Helle, L. 2009. Educating IT project managers through projectbased learning: A working-life perspective. The Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 24, Article 16, 270-299.
  22. von Glasersfeld, E. 1984. An introduction to radical constructivism. In Watzlawick, P. (eds.) The Invented Reality. How do We Know What We Believe We Know? Contributions to Constructivism, Norton, New York, NY, 17-40.
  23. Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society. The development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Pirhonen M. (2014). Using Activity Theory in Developing Instructial Tools for Project Management Studies . In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-021-5, pages 323-328. DOI: 10.5220/0004963203230328


in Bibtex Style

@conference{csedu14,
author={Maritta Pirhonen},
title={Using Activity Theory in Developing Instructial Tools for Project Management Studies},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,},
year={2014},
pages={323-328},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004963203230328},
isbn={978-989-758-021-5},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,
TI - Using Activity Theory in Developing Instructial Tools for Project Management Studies
SN - 978-989-758-021-5
AU - Pirhonen M.
PY - 2014
SP - 323
EP - 328
DO - 10.5220/0004963203230328