Digital Governance and Collaborative Strategies for Improving Service Quality

Michael E. Milakovich

Abstract

This paper explores changes in traditional political linkages and argues for greater use of a collaborative model (Figure 2) for achieving citizen access with information communication technologies (ICTs). There is substantial evidence that a ‘paradigm’ shift from bureaucracy-driven electronic to collaborative digital governance is taking place. Common factors which encourage or limit adoption of ICTs by governmental agencies include public administrators’ distrust of non-professionals, government officials’ fear of loss of control, lack of sufficient funding. Prospects for the future expansion of digital governance to deliver higher quality less costly government services in the current strict fiscal environment are assessed. The paper highlights case studies of emerging applications in selected cities and states where advanced ICT applications are being used to achieve operating efficiencies, program effectiveness, and productivity. Examples are given which can serve as ‘benchmarks’ for collaborative reforms. Digital governance strategies can promote both the politics and performance management potential for technological collaboration well as improve access to and satisfaction with government services. Emerging collaborative relationships among governments and public as well as private agencies not only result in a more efficient service delivery, but also lead to more accountable and interoperable administrative structure.

References

  1. Agranoff, R. and M. McGuire. (2004) Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
  2. Alvarez, R.M., Levin, I., Trechsel, A. H., Vassil, K. (2012). “Voting Advice Applications: How Useful? For Whom?” Paper delivered at St. Anne's College, Oxford University, October, 2012.
  3. Bretschneider, S. (1990). “Management Information Systems in Public and Private Organizations: An Empirical Test.” Public Administration Review, 50, (5): 536-545.
  4. Boyd, D. (2008). “Can Social Networking Sites Enable Political Action?” Chapter in A. Fine, M. Sifry, A. Raseij, & J. Levi (Eds.), Rebooting Democracy. New York: Personal Democracy.
  5. Bovaird, T, and Loeffler. E. (2012). “From Engagement to Co-Production: the Contributions of Users and Communities to Outcomes and Public Value.” ISTR, Voluntas, 23:1119-1138.
  6. Dijk, J.A.G.M.V. (2005). The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage Publications.
  7. Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & J. Tinkler. (2006). “New Public Management Is Dead: Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research the Theory, 16 (3): 467-494.
  8. Dwoskin, Elizabeth (2014). “How New York's Fire Department Uses Data Mining.” http://blogs.wsj.com/ digits/2014/01/24/how-new-yorks-fire-departmentuses-data-mining/?mod=WSJBlog
  9. Florini, A.M. (2002). “Increasing Transparency in Government,” International Journal on World Peace, 19 (3): 3-37.
  10. Goldfinch, S. (2007). “Pessimism, Computer Failure, and Information Systems Development in the Public Sector.” Public Administration Review, 67 (5): 917- 929.
  11. Hindman, M (2009). The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
  12. Ho, A.T. (2002). “Reinventing Local Governments and the e-Government Initiative.” Public Administration Review, 62 (4): 434-444
  13. Heeks, R., & Bhatnagar, S. (1999). “Understanding Success and Failure in Information Age Reform.” (pp. 49-74). In R. Heeks, (Ed.), Reinventing Government in the Information Age: International Practice in ITEnabled Public Sector Reform. London, UK: Routledge.
  14. Kannan, P.K. and Chang, A. M. (2013). Beyond Citizen Engagement: Involving the Public in Co-Delivering Government Services. Report by IBM Center for Business and Government. Retrieved at www.businessofgovernment.org
  15. Klofstad, C.A. (2011). Civic Talk: Peers, Politics and the Future of Democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  16. Lindblom, C. (1959). “The Science of 'Muddling Through,78” Public Administration Review, 19(4): 79- 88.
  17. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Sage Publishers.
  18. McIver, William J. Elmagarmid, Ahmed K. (2002). Advances in Digital Government: Technology, Human Factors, and Policy. Hingham, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  19. Milakovich, Michael E. (2005). Improving Service Quality in the Global Economy. New York: Auerbach Publications, Taylor and Francis.
  20. Milakovich, M. (2010). “The Internet and Increased Citizen Participation in Government,” Journal of EGovernment and EDemocracy, 1 (2): 1-9.
  21. Milakovich, M. (2012a). Digital Governance: New Technologies for Improving Public Service and Participation. London and New York: Rutledge.
  22. Milakovich, M. (2012b). “Anticipatory Government: Integrating Big Data for Smaller Government,” Paper delivered at St. Anne's College, Oxford University, October, 2012.
  23. Milakovich, M. and G. J. Gordon (2013). Public Administration in America (11th ed.) Boston: Cengage Learning.
  24. Mossberger, K, Tolbert, C.J., and Stansbury, M, (2003). Virtual Inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
  25. Newsom, G. and L. Dickey (2013). Citizenville: How to Take Town Square Digital and Reinvent Government. New York: Penguin Press.
  26. “Obama Administration Unveils “Big Data” Initiative: Announces $200 Million in New R&D Investments,” (2012) White House Office of Technology Policy, Executive Office of the President, March 29, 2012.
  27. Obi, Toshio (Ed.) (2007). E-Governance: A Global Perspective on a New Paradigm. Amsterdam, Berlin, Oxford, Tokyo, Washington, DC: IOS Press.
  28. O'Leary, R, C. Gerard, and L. Bingham, (2006). “Introduction to the Symposium on Collaborative Public Management. Special Issue.” Public Administration Review, 66: 6-9.
  29. Parviainen, O., P. Poutanen, R. Laaksonen and S., Rekola, M. (2012). “Measuring the Effect of Social Connections on Political Activity in Facebook,” Communication Studies, Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki.
  30. Simone-Novak, B. (2009). Wiki Government: How Technology can make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
  31. Tang, C. P. and S.Y. Tang. (2014) “Managing Incentive Dynamics for Collaborative Governance in Land and Ecological Development.” Public Administrative Review, 74 (2): 220-231.
  32. THE WORLD BANK. (2014) Website retrieved at http://www.worldbank.org/
  33. Thomas, G.A., & Jajodia, S. (2004). “Commercial Offthe-Shelf Enterprise Resource Planning Software Implementations in the Public Sectors: Practical Approaches for Improving Project Success.” Journal of Government Financial Management, 53 (2): pp. 12- 18.
  34. UNESCO (2011) Retrieved at: http://portal.unesco. org/ci/en/ev.php-URL_ID=3038&URL_DO=DO_ TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
  35. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). 1995. Falling through the net: A survey of the "have nots" in rural and urban America. Retrieved from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fallingthru.html
  36. Vassil, Kristjan. (2011). Voting Smarter? The Impact of Voting Advice Applications on Political Behavior. PhD Dissertation. European University Institute.
  37. West, D.M. (2005). Digital Government: Technology and Public Sector Performance. Princeton University Press: Princeton and Oxford.
  38. Whitaker, G. (1980). “Coproduction: Citizen Participation in Service Delivery,” Public Administration Review, 40 (3): 240-246.
  39. Williamson, B. (2014). “Governing Software: Networks, Databases, and Algorithmic Power in the Digital Governance of Public Education,” Learning, Media, and Technology, 39 (3):1-23.
  40. Xu, H. (2012). “Information Technology, Public Administration, and Citizen Participation: The Impacts of E-Government on Political and Administrative Processes.” Public Administration Review, 72, (6) 915-920.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

E. Milakovich M. (2014). Digital Governance and Collaborative Strategies for Improving Service Quality . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing - Volume 1: KMIS, (IC3K 2014) ISBN 978-989-758-050-5, pages 109-118. DOI: 10.5220/0005021001090118


in Bibtex Style

@conference{kmis14,
author={Michael E. Milakovich},
title={Digital Governance and Collaborative Strategies for Improving Service Quality },
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing - Volume 1: KMIS, (IC3K 2014)},
year={2014},
pages={109-118},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005021001090118},
isbn={978-989-758-050-5},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing - Volume 1: KMIS, (IC3K 2014)
TI - Digital Governance and Collaborative Strategies for Improving Service Quality
SN - 978-989-758-050-5
AU - E. Milakovich M.
PY - 2014
SP - 109
EP - 118
DO - 10.5220/0005021001090118