An Ontology Roadmap for Crowdsourcing Innovation Intermediaries

Cândida Silva, Isabel Ramos


Ontologies have proliferated in the last years, essentially justified by the need of achieving a consensus in the multiple representations of reality inside computers, and therefore the accomplishment of interoperability between machines and systems. Ontologies provide an explicit conceptualization that describes the semantics of the data. Crowdsourcing innovation intermediaries are organizations that mediate the communication and relationship between companies that aspire to solve some problem or to take advantage of any business opportunity with a crowd that is prone to give ideas based on their knowledge, experience and wisdom, taking advantage of web 2.0 tools. Various ontologies have emerged, but at the best of our knowledge, there isn’t any ontology that represents the entire process of intermediation of crowdsourcing innovation. In this paper we present an ontology roadmap for developing crowdsourcing innovation ontology of the intermediation process. Over the years, several authors have proposed some distinct methodologies, by different proposals of combining practices, activities, languages, according to the project they were involved in. We start making a literature review on ontology building, and analyse and compare ontologies that propose the development from scratch with the ones that propose reusing other ontologies. We also review enterprise and innovation ontologies known in literature. Finally, are presented the criteria for selecting the methodology and the roadmap for building crowdsourcing innovation intermediary ontology.


  1. Bernaras, A., Laresgoiti, I., & Correa, J., 1996. Building and Reusing Ontologies for Electrical Network Applications. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI96). Budapeste, Hungary.
  2. Bullinger, A., 2008. Innovation and Ontologies: Structuring the Early Stages of Innovation Management, Springer.
  3. Chesbrough, H.W., 2006. Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm Henry Chesbrought,Wim Vanhaverbeke and Joel West, Eds., Oxford University Press.
  4. Corcho, Ó. et al., 2002. WebODE: An Integrated Workbench for Ontology Representation, Reasoning, and Exchange. In Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management: Ontologies and the Semantic Web. pp. 295-310.
  5. Corcho, O., Fernández-López, M. & Gómez-Pérez, A., 2003. Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies. Where is their meeting point? Data & Knowledge Engineering, 46(1), pp.41-64.
  6. Fensel, D. et al., 2000. On-To-Knowledge: Ontologybased Tools for Knowledge Management. In Proceedings of the eBusiness and eWork 2000 (EMMSEC 2000) Conference. eBusiness and eWork 2000 (EMMSEC 2000) Conference. Madrid, Spain.
  7. Fensel, D., 2004. Ontologies: A Silves Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce 2 Ed., Springer-Verlag Berling Heidelberg.
  8. Fernández-Pérez, M. & Gómez-Pérez, A., 2002. Overview and Analysis of Methodologies for Building Ontologies. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 17(02), pp.129-156.
  9. Fox, M.S. & Gruninger, M., 1998. Enterprise Modeling. AI Magazine, 19(3), pp.109-121.
  10. Gasevic, D., Djuric, D. & Devedzic, V., 2006. Model Driven Architecture and Ontology Development, Springer-Verlag Berling Heidelberg.
  11. Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M. & Corcho, O., 2004. Ontological engineering: with examples from the areas of knowledge management, e-commerce and the Semantic Web, Springer.
  12. Gómez-Pérez, A., & Suárez-Figueroa, M. C., 2008. NeOn Methodology: Scenarios for Building Networks of Ontologies. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management Knowledge Patterns (EKAW 2008).
  13. Gruber, T.R., 1995. Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(5-6), pp.907-928.
  14. Grüninger, M., & Fox, M. S., 1995. Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies. Presented at the Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, IJCAI-95, Montreal.
  15. Guarino, N., 1998. Formal ontology in Information Systems. In Proceedings of FOIS'98. FOIS'98. Trento, Italy.
  16. Guarino, N., 1995. Formal ontology, conceptual analysis and knowedge representation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(5/6), pp.625-640.
  17. Van Heijst, G., Schreiber, A.T. & Wielinga, B.J., 1997. Using explicit ontologies in KBS development. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46(2-3), pp.183-292.
  18. Hepp, M., 2007. Ontologies: State of Art, Business Potential, and Grand Challenges. In Ontology Management: Semantic Web, Semantic Web Services, and Business Applications. Springer, pp. 3-22.
  19. Howe, J., 2008. Crowdsourcing: How the Power of the Crowd is Driving the Future of Business, Crown Business.
  20. Howe, J., 2006. The Rise of Crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine, 14.06, pp.1-4.
  21. Lassila, O. & McGuinness, D., 2001. The Role of FrameBased Representation on the Semantic Web, Stanford: Knowledge Systems Laboratory.
  22. Lenat, D. B., & Guha, R. V., 1990. Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project. Addison-Wesley Pub (Sd).
  23. Leppänen, M., 2007. A Context-Based Enterprise Ontology. In Business Information Systems. LNCS - Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, pp. 273-286.
  24. Mizoguchi, R., Vanwelkenhuysen, J. & Ikeda, M., 1995. Task ontology for reuse of problem solving knowledge. In N. J. I. Mars, ed. Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases: Knowledge Building & Knowledge Sharing. IOS Press.
  25. Ning, K. et al., 2006. Semantic innovation management across the extended enterprise. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 1(1-2), pp.109-128.
  26. Noy, N.F. & McGuinness, D.L., 2001. Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology, Knowledge Systems Laboratory: Standford University.
  27. Ramos, I. et al., 2009. An Action Research on Open Knowledge and Technology Transfer. In Information Systems - Creativity and Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Information Systems - Creativity and Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Guimarães, Portugal: Springer Boston, pp. 211-223.
  28. Riedl, C. et al., 2009a. An Idea Ontology for Innovation Management. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 5(4), pp.1-18.
  29. Riedl, C. et al., 2009b. Managing Service Innovations with an Idea Ontology. In Proceedings of XIX International RESER Conference. XIX International RESER Conference: Public an Private Services in the New Global Economy. Budapeste, Hungary, pp. 876-892.
  30. Smirnov, A. et al., 2005. Ontology-based knowledge repository support for healthgrids. Studies of technology and informatics, 112, pp.47-56.
  31. Surowiecki, J., 2005. The wisdom of crowds, Anchor Books.
  32. Swartout, B. et al., 1997. Toward Distributed Use of Large-Scale Ontologies. AAAI Symposium on Ontological Engineering.
  33. Tang, L. et al., 2006. WISE: A Prototype for Ontology Driven Development of Web Information Systems. In Frontiers of WWW Research and Development - APWeb 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, pp. 1163-1167.
  34. Uschold, M. et al., 1998. The Enterprise Ontology. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 13(01), pp.31-89.
  35. Uschold, M. & Gruninger, M., 1996. Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(02), pp.93-136.
  36. Uschold, M., & King, M., 1995. Towards a Methodology for Building Ontologies. In Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, held in conjunction with IJCAI-95.
  37. 1. Initiation (Requirements specification; Scheduling; Evaluation); 2. Reuse (NonOntological Resource (NOR) Reuse; Search; Reuse; Statements Reuse; Evaluation); 3. Merging (Aligning; Evaluation); 4. Re-engineering (NOR Reengineering; Modularization; Evaluation); 5.
  38. Design (Conceptualization; Evolution; Localization; Evaluation); 6. Implementation (Evaluation; Maintenance; Evaluation)

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Silva C. and Ramos I. (2014). An Ontology Roadmap for Crowdsourcing Innovation Intermediaries . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing - Volume 1: KMIS, (IC3K 2014) ISBN 978-989-758-050-5, pages 54-63. DOI: 10.5220/0005084800540063

in Bibtex Style

author={Cândida Silva and Isabel Ramos},
title={An Ontology Roadmap for Crowdsourcing Innovation Intermediaries},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing - Volume 1: KMIS, (IC3K 2014)},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing - Volume 1: KMIS, (IC3K 2014)
TI - An Ontology Roadmap for Crowdsourcing Innovation Intermediaries
SN - 978-989-758-050-5
AU - Silva C.
AU - Ramos I.
PY - 2014
SP - 54
EP - 63
DO - 10.5220/0005084800540063