Marble Initiative - Monitoring the Impact of Events on Customers Opinion

M. Fernandes Caíña, R. Díaz Redondo, A. Fernández Vilas

Abstract

Social networks have become a major source of information, opinions and sentiments about almost any subject. The purpose of this work is to provide evidences of the applicability of opinion mining methods to find out how some events may impact into public opinion about a brand, product or service. We report an experiment that mined Twitter data related to two particular brands during specific periods that have been selected from events that was supposed to affect the user’s perception. To find out conclusions, the methodology of the experiment applies several pre-processing techniques to extract sentiment information from the posts (e.g., case alterations, Part-of-Speech tagging using a Natural Language Toolkit, symbols removal, sentence and n-gram separation). The SenticNet 2 Corpus is used for polarity classification by means of a supervised algorithm where several threshold values are defined to mark positive, negative and neutral opinions. A longitudinal inspection of the polarized results on histograms allows identifying the "hot spots" and relating them to real world events. Although this paper shows the finding in our initial experiments, the ultimate goal of the research initiative, which we call Marble, is to provide a cloud solution for early detection of opinion shifts by the automatic classification of events according to their impact on opinion (propagation speed, intensity and duration), and its relationship with the normal behavior around a brand, product or service.

References

  1. Austen, I. & Gelles, D. 2013. A Takeover Bid for BlackBerry Collapses, and Its Chief Executive Vacates His Post. Available from: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/11/04/blackberry-a bandons-effort-to-sell-itself-c-e-o-to-step-down/ [02 March 2014].
  2. Blitzer, J., Dredze, M. & Pereira, F. 2007, "Biographies, bollywood, boomboxes and blenders: Domain adaptation for sentiment classification", In ACL, pp. 187.
  3. Bocking, A. 2013. BBM - An Incredible First Week on Android and iPhone. Available from: http://blogs.blackberry.com/2013/10/bbm-first-week/? CPID=SOC_C_WW_TW1383051462 [03 May 2014].
  4. Cambria, E., Havasi, C. & Hussain, A. 2012, "SenticNet 2: A Semantic and Affective Resource for Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis.", FLAIRS Conference, eds. G.M. Youngblood & P.M. McCarthy, AAAI Press.
  5. Constine, J. 2014. WhatsApp Is Down, Confirms Server Issues [Update: It's Back After A 210-Minute Outage]. Available from: http://techcrunch.com/2014/02/22/wh atsapp-is-down-facebooks-new-acquisition-confirms/ [03 March 2014].
  6. Dey, L., Haque, S.M. & Raj, N. 2010, "Mining Customer Feedbacks for Actionable Intelligence", Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WIIAT), 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on, pp. 239.
  7. Esuli, A. & Sebastiani, F. 2006, "SENTIWORDNET: A Publicly Available Lexical Resource for Opinion Mining", In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'06), pp. 417.
  8. Facebook 2014. Facebook to Acquire WhatsApp. Available from: http://newsroom.fb.com/news/ 2014/02/facebook-to-acquire-whatsapp/ [03 March 2014].
  9. Funk, A., Li, Y., Saggion, H., Bontcheva, K. & Leibold, C. 2008, "Opinion Analysis for Business Intelligence Applications", Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Ontology-supported Business IntelligenceACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 3:1.
  10. Gokulakrishnan, B., Priyanthan, P., Ragavan, T., Prasath, N. & Perera, A. 2012, "Opinion mining and sentiment analysis on a Twitter data stream", Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions (ICTer), 2012 International Conference on, Dec, pp. 182.
  11. Google Official Blog 2013. Android for all and the new Nexus 5. Available from: http://googleblog.blogspot.ca /2013/10/android-for-all-and-new-nexus-5.html [04 April 2014].
  12. Krikorian, R. 2013, New Tweets per second record, and how!. Available from: https://blog.twitter.com/2013/ new-tweets-per-second-record-and-how [10 March 2014].
  13. Manning, C.D., Raghavan, P. & Schutze, H. 2008, Introduction to Information Retrieval, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.
  14. Michelson, M. & Macskassy, S.A. 2010, "Discovering Users' Topics of Interest on Twitter: A First Look", Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Analytics for Noisy Unstructured Text DataACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 73.
  15. Miller, G.A. 1995, "WordNet: A Lexical Database for English", Commun.ACM, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 39-41.
  16. MongoDB Inc. 2014. MongoDB. Available from: http://www.mongodb.org/ [22 January 2014].
  17. NLTK Project 2014. Natural Language Toolkit. Available from: http://nltk.org/ [10 January 2014].
  18. Pak, A. & Paroubek, P. 2010, "Twitter as a Corpus for Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining", Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'10), eds. Nicoletta Calzolari (Conference Chair), Khalid Choukri, Bente Maegaard, et al, European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Valletta, Malta.
  19. Pang, B. & Lee, L. 2008, "Opinion mining and sentiment analysis", Foundations and trends in information retrieval, vol. 2, no. 1-2, pp. 1-135.
  20. Preeti & BrahmaleenKaurSidhu 2013, "Natural Language Processing", International Journal of Computer Technology and Applications, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 751- 758.
  21. Stieber, Z. 2014. WhatsApp Down: WhatsApp Not Working on Friday Night. Available from: http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/523179-whatsappdown-whatsapp-not-working-on-friday-night/ [03 March 2014].
  22. Tchalakova, M., Gerdemann, D. & Meurers, D. 2011, "Automatic Sentiment Classification of Product Reviews Using Maximal Phrases Based Analysis", Proceedings of the 2Nd Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity and Sentiment AnalysisAssociation for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pp. 111.
  23. The Apache Software Foundation 2014. Apache OpenNLP. Available from: https://opennlp.apache.org [26 February 2014].
  24. The Stanford Natural Language Processing Group 2014, January. Standford CoreNLP. Available from: http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/corenlp.shtml [26 February 2014].
  25. Twitter 2013. GET search/tweets - Twitter Developers. Available from: https://dev.twitter.com/docs/api/1.1/ get/search/tweets [03 March 2014].
  26. Twitter4J 2014. Twitter4J. Available from: http://twitter4j.org/ [03 March 2014].
  27. University of Vigo 2014. Marble Project. Available from: http://iclab.det.uvigo.es/marbleproject.html [2014, 23 June 2014].
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Fernandes Caíña M., Díaz Redondo R. and Fernández Vilas A. (2014). Marble Initiative - Monitoring the Impact of Events on Customers Opinion . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Information Retrieval - Volume 1: KDIR, (IC3K 2014) ISBN 978-989-758-048-2, pages 403-410. DOI: 10.5220/0005151504030410


in Bibtex Style

@conference{kdir14,
author={M. Fernandes Caíña and R. Díaz Redondo and A. Fernández Vilas},
title={Marble Initiative - Monitoring the Impact of Events on Customers Opinion},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Information Retrieval - Volume 1: KDIR, (IC3K 2014)},
year={2014},
pages={403-410},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005151504030410},
isbn={978-989-758-048-2},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Information Retrieval - Volume 1: KDIR, (IC3K 2014)
TI - Marble Initiative - Monitoring the Impact of Events on Customers Opinion
SN - 978-989-758-048-2
AU - Fernandes Caíña M.
AU - Díaz Redondo R.
AU - Fernández Vilas A.
PY - 2014
SP - 403
EP - 410
DO - 10.5220/0005151504030410