What If We Considered Awareness for Sustainable Knowledge Management? - Towards a Model for Self Regulated Knowledge Management Systems Based on Acceptance Models of Technologies and Awareness

Carine Edith Toure, Christine Michel, Jean-Charles Marty

Abstract

We propose, in this paper, a model of continuous use of corporate collaborative KMS. Companies do not always have the guaranty that their KMS will be continuously used. This statement can constitute an important obstacle for knowledge management processes. Our work is based on the analysis of classical models for initial and continuous use of technologies. We also analyse the regulation concept and explain how it is valuable to support a continuous use of KMS. We observed that awareness may be a regulation means that allows taking this problem into account. Awareness is a concept, which has been profusely used to improve user experience in collaborative environments. It is an important element for regulation of activity. In our model, we assume that one can integrate awareness in information systems to positively influence beliefs about them. The final objective of our work is to refine some concepts to fit the particularities of collaborative KMS and to propose an awareness regulation process using the traces of the users’ interactions with the systems.

References

  1. Antunes, P., Herskovic, V., Ochoa, S. F., & Pino, J. a. (2014). Reviewing the quality of awareness support in collaborative applications. Journal of Systems and Software, 89, 146-169. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2013.11.1078
  2. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370.
  3. Boughzala, I., & Ermine, J. L. (2007). La gestion des connaissances, un nouveau modèle pour les entreprises. In Management des connaissances en entreprise - 2ème édition (pp. 47-86).
  4. Carroll, J. M., Fellow, I., Jiang, H., Rosson, M. B., Shih, S., Wang, J., … Pennsylvania, U. S. A. (2011). Supporting Activity Awareness in Computer-Mediated Collaboration, 1-12.
  5. Charleer, S., Klerkx, J., Santos, J. L., & Duval, E. (2013). Improving awareness and reflection through collaborative , interactive visualizations of badges, 69- 81.
  6. Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology?: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts.
  7. Delone, W. H. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
  8. Ermine, J. L. (2008). Management et ingénierie des connaissances - Modèles et méthodes.
  9. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior?: An introduction to Theory and Research.
  10. Gendron, E. (2010). Cadre conceptuel pour l'élaboration d'indicateurs de collaboration à partir des traces d'activité. Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1.
  11. Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2002). A Descriptive Framework of Workspace Awareness for Real-Time Groupware. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 11(3-4), 411-446. doi:10.1023/ A:1021271517844
  12. Harrison, S., & Dourish, P. (1996). Re-place-ing space. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW 7896 (pp. 67-76). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/240080.240193
  13. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2011). Group awareness tools: It's what you do with it that matters. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1046-1058. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.002
  14. Jennex, M. E., & Olfman, L. (2004). Assessing Knowledge Management Success / Effectiveness Models, 00(C), 1-10.
  15. Ji, M., Michel, C., Lavoué, E., George, S., Lyon, U. De, Jean, U., & Lyon, M. (2013). An Architecture to Combine Activity Traces and Reporting Traces to Support Self-Regulation Processes.
  16. Karray, M.-H., Chebel-Morello, B., & Zerhouni, N. (2014). PETRA: Process Evolution using a TRAcebased system on a maintenance platform. KnowledgeBased Systems. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2014.03.010
  17. Krogstie, B. R., Schmidt, A. P., & Mora, S. (2013). Linking Reflective Learning and Knowledge Maturing in Organizations. Third International Workshop on Awareness and Reflection in Technology-Enhanced Learning, 13-28.
  18. Maier, R. (2007). Systems. In Knowledge management systems - Information and communication technologies for Knowledge Management (pp. 273 - 394).
  19. Peña, A., Kayashima, M., Mizoguchi, R., & Dominguez, R. (2013). A Conceptual Model of Metacognition to Shape Knowledge and Regulation, 4-7.
  20. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner?: Towards a new design for teaching and learning in the professions, 50(2).
  21. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Hall, M., Davis, G. B., Davis, F. D., & Walton, S. M. (2003). User acceptance of information technology?: Toward a unified view, 27(3), 425-478.
  22. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology?: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, 36(1), 157-178.
  23. Volet, S., Vauras, M., & Salonen, P. (2009). Self- and Social Regulation in Learning Contexts?: An Integrative Perspective Self- and Social Regulation in Learning Contexts?: An Integrative Perspective, (September 2011), 37-41. doi:10.1080/ 00461520903213584
  24. Zimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13-39).
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Edith Toure C., Michel C. and Marty J. (2014). What If We Considered Awareness for Sustainable Knowledge Management? - Towards a Model for Self Regulated Knowledge Management Systems Based on Acceptance Models of Technologies and Awareness . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing - Volume 1: KMIS, (IC3K 2014) ISBN 978-989-758-050-5, pages 413-418. DOI: 10.5220/0005158604130418


in Bibtex Style

@conference{kmis14,
author={Carine Edith Toure and Christine Michel and Jean-Charles Marty},
title={What If We Considered Awareness for Sustainable Knowledge Management? - Towards a Model for Self Regulated Knowledge Management Systems Based on Acceptance Models of Technologies and Awareness},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing - Volume 1: KMIS, (IC3K 2014)},
year={2014},
pages={413-418},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005158604130418},
isbn={978-989-758-050-5},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing - Volume 1: KMIS, (IC3K 2014)
TI - What If We Considered Awareness for Sustainable Knowledge Management? - Towards a Model for Self Regulated Knowledge Management Systems Based on Acceptance Models of Technologies and Awareness
SN - 978-989-758-050-5
AU - Edith Toure C.
AU - Michel C.
AU - Marty J.
PY - 2014
SP - 413
EP - 418
DO - 10.5220/0005158604130418