CFD Prediction of the Effect of Appendages and Leeway on the Force Trend of an Olympic Class Laser Dinghy Hull

Rickard Lindstrand, Jeremy Peter, Christian Finnsgård

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether the minima in hydrodynamic resistance can be predicted to occur at the same angles of heel and trim in the case of bare hull towing tank tests, bare hull simulations and appendage and leeway simulations. If so, the appendages and the leeway can be rejected from future investigations, which would prove a beneficial advancement, as they impose further complexity to simulations. The results of verification and validation (V&V) included in this paper demonstrate that the numerical method predicted too low resistance. Though the study identifies and systematically investigates possible sources of error, the major source of error was not found. These various possible sources of errors were identified for further research, and as future references for similar cases. Moreover, the simulation results for the variations of heel and trim also require further study. Before a full set of results is available, one cannot make conclusions regarding the angles of heel and trim that lead to minimal resistance. This paper discusses the results and potential avenues of future research, and is a result of an initiative at Chalmers University of Technology focusing on sports and technology.

References

  1. Davidsson, L., 2003. An Introduction to Turbulence Models. Chalmers University of technology, Göteborg.
  2. Deng, Queutey, and Visonneau, 2005. Three dimensional Flow Computation with Reynolds Stress and Algebraic Stress Models. Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Experiments (6), pp: 389-398.
  3. Eca and Hoekstra, 2006. Discretization Uncertainty Estimation Based on a Least SquaresVersion of the Grid Convergence Index. In: 2nd Workshop on CFD Uncertainty Analysis; Lisabon; October 2006.
  4. Eca and Hoekstra, 2014. A procedure for the estimation of the numerical uncertainty of CFD calculations based on grid renement studies. Journal of Computational Physics 262, pp: 104-130.
  5. Feymark, A., 2013. A Large Eddy Simulation Based FluidStructure Interaction Methodology with Application in Hydroelasticity. PhD thesis. Chalmers, Göteborg.
  6. Gatski and Speziale, 1993. On explicit algebraic stress models for complex turbulent fows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics (254), pp. 59-78.
  7. Hirt, C. W. and Nichols, B-D., 1979. Volume of Fluid (VOF) Method for the Dynamics of Free Boundaries. Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, New Mexico.
  8. Hirt and Nichols, 1998. Volume of Fluid (VOF) Method for the Dynamics of Free Boundaries. Journal of Computaional Physics (39), pp: 201-225.
  9. Larsson and Raven, 2010. Ship Resistance and Flow. The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers.
  10. Marek, Aniszewski and Boguslawski, 2008. Simplified Volume of Fluid Method (SVOF) for Two-Phase Flows. Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland.
  11. Menter, F. R., 1994. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, No. 8, pp: 1598-1605.
  12. Orych, Larsson, and Regnstrom, 2010. Adaptive overlapping grid techniques and spatial discretization schemes for increasing surface sharpness and numerical accuracy in free surface capturing methods. 28th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Pasadena California, pp: 389-398.
  13. Roache, P., 1998. Verication and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering. Hermosa Publishers.
  14. Roy, C., 2003. Grid Convergence Error Analysis for Mixed-Order Numerical Schemes. The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (41), pp: 596-604.
  15. Rumsey, C., 2013. The Menter Shear Stress Transport Turbulence Model. Web Article.
  16. Slater, J. W., 2005. Examining Spatial Grid Convergence.
  17. Web Article. 2005.
  18. Versteeg and Malalasekera, 2007. An Introduction.
  19. to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method (2nd Edition). Prentice Hall.
  20. Wallin, S. and Johansson, A. V., 2000. An Explicit Algebraic Reynolds Stress Model for Incompressible and Compressible Turbulent Flows. Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 403, pp: 89-132.
  21. Zou and Larsson, 2010. A Verication and Validation Study Based on Resistance Submissions. In: Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics 2010. Workshop, pp: 203-254.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Lindstrand R., Peter J. and Finnsgård C. (2014). CFD Prediction of the Effect of Appendages and Leeway on the Force Trend of an Olympic Class Laser Dinghy Hull . In Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress on Sports Sciences Research and Technology Support - Volume 1: icSPORTS, ISBN 978-989-758-057-4, pages 190-202. DOI: 10.5220/0005191101900202


in Bibtex Style

@conference{icsports14,
author={Rickard Lindstrand and Jeremy Peter and Christian Finnsgård},
title={CFD Prediction of the Effect of Appendages and Leeway on the Force Trend of an Olympic Class Laser Dinghy Hull},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress on Sports Sciences Research and Technology Support - Volume 1: icSPORTS,},
year={2014},
pages={190-202},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005191101900202},
isbn={978-989-758-057-4},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress on Sports Sciences Research and Technology Support - Volume 1: icSPORTS,
TI - CFD Prediction of the Effect of Appendages and Leeway on the Force Trend of an Olympic Class Laser Dinghy Hull
SN - 978-989-758-057-4
AU - Lindstrand R.
AU - Peter J.
AU - Finnsgård C.
PY - 2014
SP - 190
EP - 202
DO - 10.5220/0005191101900202