Intelligent Agents - Conversations from Human-agent Imitation Games

Kevin Warwick, Huma Shah

Abstract

What do humans say/ask beyond initial greetings? Are humans always the best at conversation? How easy is it to distinguish an intelligent human from an ‘intelligent agent’ just from their responses to unrestricted questions during a conversation? This paper presents an insight into the nature of human communications, including behaviours and interactions, from a type of interaction - stranger-to-stranger discourse realised from implementing Turing’s question-answer imitation games at Bletchley Park UK in 2012 as part of the Turing centenary commemorations. The authors contend that the effects of lying, misunderstanding, humour and lack of shared knowledge during human-machine and human-human interactions can provide an impetus to building better conversational agents increasingly deployed as virtual customer service agents. Applying the findings could improve human-robot interaction, for example as conversational companions for the elderly or unwell. But do we always want these agents to talk like humans do? Suggestions to advance intelligent agent conversation are provided.

References

  1. Fowler, H., and Fowler, F. (Eds.). (1995). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English (9th ed., p. 486). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  2. Hayes, P. and Ford, K. 1995. Turing Test Considered Harmful. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 1. Montreal, August 20-25: pp. 972-7.
  3. Hodges, A. 1992. Alan Turing: the Enigma. Vintage Books, London.
  4. Minsky, M. 2013. Singularity 1 on 1: The Turing test is a joke! Youtube video interview by Nikola Danaylov: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PdxQbOvAlI.
  5. Penrose, R. (1994). Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness. Oxford University Press, UK.
  6. Searle, J.R. 1997. The Mystery of Consciousness. The New York Review of Books. NY, US.
  7. Shah, H. 2013. Conversation, Deception and Intelligence: Turing's Question-Answer Game. In S.B. Cooper and J van Leeuwen (Eds) Alan Turing: his life and impact. Elsevier: Oxford, UK: pp. 614-620.
  8. Shah, H., Warwick, K., Bland, I.M., Chapman, C.D. and Allen, M. 2012. Turing's Imitation Game: Role of Error-making in Intelligent Thought. Turing in Context II, Brussels, 10 October.
  9. Shah, H. 2011. Turing's Misunderstood Imitation Game and IBM's Watson Success. Keynote in 2nd Towards a Comprehensive Intelligence test (TCIT) symposium at AISB 2011, University of York, 5 April.
  10. Shah, H., and Henry, O. 2005. Confederate Effect in human-machine textual interaction. 5th WSEAS Information Science and Communications (ISCA) conference, Cancun, Mexico, May 11-14.
  11. Shah, H., and Pavlika, V. 2005. Text-based Dialogical EQuery Systems: Gimmick or Convenience?. In Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Speech and Computers (SPECOM), University of Patras, Greece, October 17-19, pp. 425-428.
  12. Shah, H., and Warwick, K. 2010b. Hidden Interlocutor Misidentification in Practical Turing Tests. Minds and Machines. Vol. 20 (3), August: pp 441-454.
  13. Shah, H., and Warwick, K. 2010a. Testing Turing's parallel-paired imitation game. Kybernetes, Vol. 39 (3), pp. 449-465.
  14. Turing, A.M. 1952. With R. Braithwaite, G. Jefferson, and M. Newman BBC radio debate on 'Can Automatic Calculating Machines be said to Think?78, in S.B. Cooper and J. van Leeuwen (Eds). Alan Turing: His Work and Impact. Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2013, pp 667-676.
  15. Turing, A.M. 1950. Computing Machinery and Intelligence. MIND, Vol 59 (236), pp. 433-460.
  16. Warwick, K. and Shah, H. 2014b. Human Misidentification in Turing tests. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence (JETAI). DOI: 10.1080/0952813X.2014.921734.
  17. Warwick, K. and Shah, H. 2014a. Effects of Lying in Practical Turing tests. AI and Society. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-013-0534-3.
  18. Warwick, K., and Shah, H. 2013. Good Machine Performance in Turing's Imitation Game. IEEE Transactions in Computational Intelligence and AI in Games. DOI: 10.1109/TCIAIG.2013.2283538.
  19. Warwick, K., Shah, H. and Moor, J. 2013. Some Implications of a Sample of Turing tests. Minds and Machines, Vol. 23, issue 2, pp. 163-177.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Warwick K. and Shah H. (2015). Intelligent Agents - Conversations from Human-agent Imitation Games . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2: ICAART, ISBN 978-989-758-074-1, pages 261-268. DOI: 10.5220/0005176702610268


in Bibtex Style

@conference{icaart15,
author={Kevin Warwick and Huma Shah},
title={Intelligent Agents - Conversations from Human-agent Imitation Games},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2: ICAART,},
year={2015},
pages={261-268},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005176702610268},
isbn={978-989-758-074-1},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2: ICAART,
TI - Intelligent Agents - Conversations from Human-agent Imitation Games
SN - 978-989-758-074-1
AU - Warwick K.
AU - Shah H.
PY - 2015
SP - 261
EP - 268
DO - 10.5220/0005176702610268