Inconsistency-based Ranking of Knowledge Bases

Said Jabbour, Badran Raddaoui, Lakhdar Sais

Abstract

Inconsistencies are a usually undesirable feature of many kinds of data and knowledge. Measuring inconsistency is potentially useful to determine which parts of the data or of the knowledge base are conflicting. Several measures have been proposed to quantify such inconsistencies. However, one of the main problems lies in the difficulty to compare their underlying quality. Indeed, a highly inconsistent knowledge base with respect to a given inconsistency measure can be considered less inconsistent using another one. In this paper, we propose a new framework allowing us to partition a set of knowledge bases as a sequence of subsets according to a set of inconsistency measures, where the first element of the partition corresponds to the most inconsistent one. Then we discuss how finer ranking between knowledge bases can be derived from an original combination of existing measures. Finally, we extend our framework to provide some inconsistency measures obtained by combining existing ones.

References

  1. Arieli, O. and Avron, A. (1998). The value of the four values. Artificial Intelligence, 102:97-141.
  2. Bailey, J. and Stuckey, P. J. (2005). Discovery of minimal unsatisfiable subsets of constraints using hitting set dualization. In PADL, pages 174-186.
  3. Bertossi, L. E., Hunter, A., and Schaub, T. (2005). Introduction to inconsistency tolerance. In Inconsistency Tolerance, pages 1-14.
  4. Chen, Q., Zhang, C., and Zhang, S. (2004). A verification model for electronic transaction protocols. In APWeb, pages 824-833.
  5. Doder, D., Raskovic, M., Markovic, Z., and Ognjanovic, Z. (2010). Measures of inconsistency and defaults. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning, 51(7):832-845.
  6. Grant, J. (1978). Classifications for inconsistent theories. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 19(3):435-444.
  7. Grant, J. and Hunter, A. (2006). Measuring inconsistency in knowledgebases. J. Intell. Inf. Syst., 27(2):159-184.
  8. Grant, J. and Hunter, A. (2011). Measuring consistency gain and information loss in stepwise inconsistency resolution. In ECSQARU, pages 362-373.
  9. Grant, J. and Hunter, A. (2013). Distance-based measures of inconsistency. In ECSQARU, pages 230-241.
  10. Hunter, A. (2006). How to act on inconsistent news: Ignore, resolve, or reject. Data Knowl. Eng., 57(3):221-239.
  11. Hunter, A. and Konieczny, S. (2008). Measuring inconsistency through minimal inconsistent sets. In KR, pages 358-366.
  12. Hunter, A. and Konieczny, S. (2010). On the measure of conflicts: Shapley inconsistency values. Artif. Intell., 174(14):1007-1026.
  13. Hunter, A., Parsons, S., and Wooldridge, M. (2014). Measuring inconsistency in multi-agent systems. Unstliche Intelligenz.
  14. Jabbour, S., Ma, Y., and Raddaoui, B. (2014a). Inconsistency measurement thanks to mus decomposition. In AAMAS, pages 877-884.
  15. Jabbour, S., Ma, Y., Raddaoui, B., and Saïs, L. (2014b). On the characterization of inconsistency: A prime implicates based framework. In ICTAI, pages 146-153.
  16. Jabbour, S., Ma, Y., Raddaoui, B., and Saïs, L. (2014c). Prime implicates based inconsistency characterization. In ECAI, pages 1037 - 1038.
  17. Jabbour, S. and Raddaoui, B. (2013). Measuring inconsistency through minimal proofs. In ECSQARU, pages 290-301.
  18. Knight, K. (2002). Measuring inconsistency. J. Philosophical Logic, 31(1):77-98.
  19. Liffiton, M. H. and Sakallah, K. A. (2008). Algorithms for computing minimal unsatisfiable subsets of constraints. J. Autom. Reasoning, 40(1):1-33.
  20. Ma, Y., Qi, G., and Hitzler, P. (2011). Computing inconsistency measure based on paraconsistent semantics. J. Log. Comput., 21(6):1257-1281.
  21. Ma, Y., Qi, G., Xiao, G., Hitzler, P., and Lin, Z. (2010). Computational complexity and anytime algorithm for inconsistency measurement. Int. J. Software and Informatics, 4(1):3-21.
  22. Martinez, A. B. B., Arias, J. J. P., and and, A. F. V. (2004). On measuring levels of inconsistency in multiperspective requirements specifications. In PRISE'04, pages 21-30.
  23. Martinez, M. V., Pugliese, A., Simari, G. I., Subrahmanian, V. S., and Prade, H. (2007). How dirty is your relational database? an axiomatic approach. In ECSQARU, pages 103-114.
  24. McAreavey, K., Liu, W., Miller, P., and Mu, K. (2011). Measuring inconsistency in a network intrusion detection rule set based on snort. Int. J. Semantic Computing, 5(3).
  25. Mu, K., Liu, W., and Jin, Z. (2011). A general framework for measuring inconsistency through minimal inconsistent sets. Knowl. Inf. Syst., 27(1):85-114.
  26. Mu, K., Liu, W., and Jin, Z. (2012). Measuring the blame of each formula for inconsistent prioritized knowledge bases. J. Log. Comput., 22(3):481-516.
  27. Oller, C. A. (2004). Measuring coherence using lp-models. J. Applied Logic, 2(4):451-455.
  28. Qi, G., Liu, W., and Bell, D. A. (2005). Measuring conflict and agreement between two prioritized belief bases. In IJCAI, pages 552-557.
  29. Xiao, G., Lin, Z., Ma, Y., and Qi, G. (2010). Computing inconsistency measurements under multi-valued semantics by partial max-sat solvers. In KR.
  30. Xiao, G. and Ma, Y. (2012). Inconsistency measurement based on variables in minimal unsatisfiable subsets. In ECAI, pages 864-869.
  31. Zhou, L., Huang, H., Qi, G., Ma, Y., Huang, Z., and Qu, Y. (2009). Measuring inconsistency in dl-lite ontologies. In Web Intelligence, pages 349-356.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Jabbour S., Raddaoui B. and Sais L. (2015). Inconsistency-based Ranking of Knowledge Bases . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2: ICAART, ISBN 978-989-758-074-1, pages 414-419. DOI: 10.5220/0005210704140419


in Bibtex Style

@conference{icaart15,
author={Said Jabbour and Badran Raddaoui and Lakhdar Sais},
title={Inconsistency-based Ranking of Knowledge Bases},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2: ICAART,},
year={2015},
pages={414-419},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005210704140419},
isbn={978-989-758-074-1},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2: ICAART,
TI - Inconsistency-based Ranking of Knowledge Bases
SN - 978-989-758-074-1
AU - Jabbour S.
AU - Raddaoui B.
AU - Sais L.
PY - 2015
SP - 414
EP - 419
DO - 10.5220/0005210704140419