Contextual Representations for Enterprise Model Application (C.R.E.M.A.)

Nikolaus Wintrich, Malte Meißner

Abstract

Enterprise models help to make enterprise processes and services more transparent while also improving stockholders’ abilities to analyze, optimize and control them. These models include every relevant element as well as enterprise processes, including their relationships with one another. The growing complexity of these models reduces their usability as well as user friendliness. The different stakeholders have different expectations towards the visualization and the relevant information being displayed to them. Therefore contextual representations of enterprise models allow the provision of the relevant information in a user oriented perspective by applying different visualization methods. This helps to manage the complexity and facilitates a sustainable application of enterprise models for various enterprise aspects such as quality management, strategic planning, reporting and operational control.

References

  1. BARC, 2013. Steigende Komplexität als Hauptherausforderung von PerformanceManagement-Anwendungen. URL: http://www.find software.de/Fachinfo/Steigende-Komplexitaet-alsHauptherausforderung-von-PerformanceManagement-Anwendungen.html [Stand 2014-07-31].
  2. BearingPoint, 2012. Business Process Management-Studie 2012: Stärkung der pro zessorientierung im Unternehmen durch nachhaltige Optimierung der Prozess- und IT-Landschaft. URL: http://www.bearing point.com/de-de/7-5990/business-processmanagement-studie-2012-white-paper/.
  3. Bobrik, R., 2008. Konfigurierbare Visualisierung komplexer Prozessmodelle. 1. Aufl. München: Dr. Hut. (Informatik).
  4. Gering, P., 2012. Analyse zur Anwendung von kontextuellen Sichten eines modellbasierten Prozessassistenten im Rahmen der Unternehmensmodellierung anhand eines Anwendungsfalls aus der Luftfahrtindustrie. Studienarbeit. Technische Universität Berlin.
  5. Harmon, P., Wolf, C., 2014. The State of Business Process Managment 2014. URL: http://www.bptrends.com/ bpt/wp-content/uploads/BPTrends-State-of-BPMSurvey-Report.pdf [Stand 2014-07-31].
  6. Hipp, M., Mutschler, B., Reichert, M., 2011. on the Context-aware, Personalized Delivery of Process Information: Viewpoints, Problems, and Requirements. In 6th Int'l Conf. on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES'11), Industrial Track, 390-397.
  7. Hipp, M., Mutschler, B., Reichert, M., 2012. Navigating in Process Model Collections: a New Approach Inspired by Google Earth. in Aalst, Wil, u.a. (Hg.): Business Process Management Workshops. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. (Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing), 87-98.
  8. Hipp, M. et.al., 2013. a Framework for the Intelligent Delivery and User-Adequate Visualization of Process Information. In 28th Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC'13): ACM Press, 1383-1390.
  9. Hipp, M., et.al., 2014. Enabling a User-Friendly Visualization of Business Process Models. in. 3rd Int'l Workshop on Theory and Applications of Process Visualization (TaProViz'14), BPM 2014 Workshops.
  10. Houy, C., Fettke, P., Loos, P., 2012. Understanding Understandability of Conceptual Models - What Are We Actually Talking about?. in Hutchison, David, u.a. (Hg.): Conceptual Modeling. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), 64-77.
  11. Jochem, R., Knothe, T., Wintrich, N., 2012. Enforcing front-loading in engineering processes through product-process integration. in Enterprise Interoperability V. Guildford, Surrey: Springer London, 71-80.
  12. Kolb, J., Reichert, M., 2013. Data flow abstractions and adaptations through updatable process views. in Shin, Sung Y. & Maldonado, José C. (Hg.): the 28th Annual ACM Symposium, 1447.
  13. La Rosa, M., et. al., 2011. Managing Process Model Complexity via Concrete Syntax Modifications. in Industrial Informatics, IEEE Transactions on 7(2), 255-265.
  14. Malinova, M., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J., 2014. Automatic Extraction of Process Categories from Process Model Collections. in Lohmann, Niels, Song, Minseok & Wohed, Petia (Hg.): Business Process Management Workshops. Cham: Springer International Publishing. (Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing), 430-441.
  15. Mendling, J., Reijers, H., Cardoso, J., 2007. What Makes Process Models Understandable? in Alonso, Gustavo, Dadam, Peter & Rosemann, Michael (Hg.): Business Process Management. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), 48-63.
  16. Munkhbadarch-Dietrich, M., 2012. Entwicklung eines Clients zur Bereitstellung kontextueller Sichten von Unternehmensmodellen anhand eines Anwendungsfalls im Maschinenbau. Diplomarbeit. Technische Universität Berlin.
  17. Reijers, H., Mendling, J., 2008. Modularity in Process Models: Review and Effects. in Dumas, Marlon, Reichert, Manfred & Shan, Ming-Chien (Hg.): Business Process Management. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), 20-35.
  18. Saidani, O., Nurcan, S., 2014. Business Process Modeling: a Multi-perspective Approach Integrating Variability. in van der Aalst, Wil, u.a. (Hg.): Enterprise, BusinessProcess and Information Systems Modeling. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. (Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing), 169-183.
  19. Santorum, M., Front, a, Rieu, D., 2014. ISEAsy: a Social Business Process Management Platform. in Lohmann, Niels, Song, Minseok & Wohed, Petia (Hg.): Business Process Management Workshops. Cham: Springer International Publishing. (Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing), 125-137.
  20. Schwermer, M., 1998. Modellierungsvorgehen zur Planung von Geschäftsprozessen. Berlin: IPK (Berichte aus dem Produktionstechnischen Zentrum Berlin).
  21. Vernadat, F.B., 2002. Enterprise modeling and integration (EMI): current status and research perspectives. in Annual Review in Control 26: 15-25.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Wintrich N. and Meißner M. (2015). Contextual Representations for Enterprise Model Application (C.R.E.M.A.) . In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development - Volume 1: MODELSWARD, ISBN 978-989-758-083-3, pages 483-489. DOI: 10.5220/0005243804830489


in Bibtex Style

@conference{modelsward15,
author={Nikolaus Wintrich and Malte Meißner},
title={Contextual Representations for Enterprise Model Application (C.R.E.M.A.)},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development - Volume 1: MODELSWARD,},
year={2015},
pages={483-489},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005243804830489},
isbn={978-989-758-083-3},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development - Volume 1: MODELSWARD,
TI - Contextual Representations for Enterprise Model Application (C.R.E.M.A.)
SN - 978-989-758-083-3
AU - Wintrich N.
AU - Meißner M.
PY - 2015
SP - 483
EP - 489
DO - 10.5220/0005243804830489