Impressions of Size-Changing in a Companion Robot

Martin Cooney, Stefan M. Karlsson

Abstract

Physiological data such as head movements can be used to intuitively control a companion robot to perform useful tasks. We believe that some tasks such as reaching for high objects or getting out of a person’s way could be accomplished via size changes, but such motions should not seem threatening or bothersome. To gain insight into how size changes are perceived, the Think Aloud Method was used to gather typical impressions of a new robotic prototype which can expand in height or width based on a user’s head movements. The results indicate promise for such systems, also highlighting some potential pitfalls.

References

  1. Alonso-Mora, J., et al., 2012. Object and Animation Display with Multiple Aerial Vehicles. In Proc. IROS, 1078-1083. DOI: 10.1109/IROS.2012.6385551.
  2. An, B., et al., 2014. An End-to-End Approach to Making Self-Folded 3D Surface Shapes by Uniform Heating. In Proc. ICRA, 1466-1473. DOI: 10.1109/ICRA.2014.6907045.
  3. Brodbeck, L., Iida, F., 2012. Enhanced Robotic Body Extension with Modular Units. In Proc. IROS, 1428- 1433. DOI: 10.1109/IROS.2012.6385516.
  4. Burgoon, J. K., 1991. Relational Message Interpretations of Touch, Conversational Distance, and Posture. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 15 (4), 233-259. DOI: 10.1007/BF00986924.
  5. Carney, D.R., Hall, J.A., Smith LeBeau, L., 2005. Beliefs about the nonverbal expression of social power. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 29 (2), 105-123. DOI: 10.1007/s10919-005-2743-z.
  6. Clark, M. S., Pataki, S. P., Carver, V. H., 1996. Some thoughts and findings on self-presentation of emotions in relationships. Knowledge structures in close relationships: A social psychological approach, 247- 274.
  7. Cootes, T. F., Taylor, C. J., Cooper, D. H., Graham, J., 1992. Training models of shape from sets of examples. In Proceedings of BMVC'92, 266-275.
  8. Cousins, S., Evans, H., 2014. ROS Expands the World for Quadriplegics. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 21 (2), 14-17.
  9. Darwin, C. R., 1872. The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: John Murray. 1st edition. Retrieved Nov. 4, 2014 from http://darwinonline.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F1142&viewt ype=text&pageseq=1.
  10. Dautenhahn, K., 2004. Robots We Like to Live With? - A Developmental Perspective on a Personalized, LifeLong Robot Companion. In Proc. RO-MAN, 17-22. DOI: 10.1109/ROMAN.2004.1374720.
  11. Fairclough, S., Gilleade, K., Nacke, L.E., Mandryk, R.L., 2011. Brain and Body Interfaces: Designing for Meaningful Interaction. In Proceedings of CHI EA, 65-68. DOI: 10.1145/1979742.1979591.
  12. Kanemura, A., et al., 2013. A Waypoint-Based Framework in Brain-Controlled Smart Home Environments: Brain Interfaces, Domotics, and Robotics Integration. In Proc. IROS, 865-870. DOI: 10.1109/IROS.2013.6696452.
  13. Karlsson, S. M., Bigun, J., 2012. Lip-motion events analysis and lip segmentation using optical flow. In Proc. CVPRW 2012, 138-145. DOI: 10.1109/CVPRW.2012.6239228.
  14. Lewis, C., Rieman, J., 1993. Task-Centered User Interface Design: A Practical Introduction. Technical Document.
  15. Lorenz, K. 1971. Studies in Animal and Human Behavior. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
  16. Lucas, B. D., Kanade, T., 1981. An Iterative Image Registration Technique with an Application to Stereo Vision. In Proc. IJCAI 7881, 674-679.
  17. Maslow, A. H., 1943. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review 50 (4), 370-96. DOI: 10.1037/h0054346.
  18. Miura, K., 1985. Method of Packaging and Deployment of Large Membranes in Space. Inst. of Space and Astronaut. Science report 618, 1-9.
  19. Pedersen, E. W., Subramanian, S., Hornbaek, K., 2014. Is my phone alive?: a large-scale study of shape change in handheld devices using videos. In Proc. CHI, 2579- 2588. DOI: 10.1145/2556288.2557018.
  20. Rae, I., Takayama, L. Mutlu, B, 2013. The influence of height in robot-mediated communication. In Proc. HRI, 1-8. DOI: 10.1109/HRI.2013.6483495.
  21. Revzen, S., Bhoite, M., Macasieb, A., Yim, M., 2011. Structure synthesis on-the-fly in a modular robot. In Proc. IROS, 4797-4802. DOI: 10.1109/IROS.2011.6094575.
  22. Steltz, E., et al., 2009. JSEL: Jamming Skin Enabled Locomotion. In Proc. IROS, 5672-5677. DOI: 10.1109/IROS.2009.5354790.
  23. Tonn, B. E., 1984. A sociopsychological contribution to the theory of individual time-allocation. Environment and Planning A 16 (2), 201-223.
  24. Walters, M. L., Koay, K. L., Syrdal, D. S., Dautenhahn, K., Boekhorst, R., 2009. Preferences and Perceptions of Robot Appearance and Embodiment in HumanRobot Interaction Trials. In Proc. New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction: Symposium at AISB09, 136-143.
  25. Wu, F. Y., Asada, H. H., 2014. Bio-artificial synergies for grasp posture control of supernumerary robotic fingers. In Proc. Robotics: Science and Systems.
  26. You, Z., Kuribayashi, K., 2003. A Novel Origami Stent. In Proc. Summer Bioengineer Conf.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Cooney M. and M. Karlsson S. (2015). Impressions of Size-Changing in a Companion Robot . In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Physiological Computing Systems - Volume 1: PhyCS, ISBN 978-989-758-085-7, pages 118-123. DOI: 10.5220/0005328801180123


in Bibtex Style

@conference{phycs15,
author={Martin Cooney and Stefan M. Karlsson},
title={Impressions of Size-Changing in a Companion Robot},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Physiological Computing Systems - Volume 1: PhyCS,},
year={2015},
pages={118-123},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005328801180123},
isbn={978-989-758-085-7},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Physiological Computing Systems - Volume 1: PhyCS,
TI - Impressions of Size-Changing in a Companion Robot
SN - 978-989-758-085-7
AU - Cooney M.
AU - M. Karlsson S.
PY - 2015
SP - 118
EP - 123
DO - 10.5220/0005328801180123