On-premise ERP Organizational Post-implementation Practices - Comparison between Large Enterprises and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises

Victoria Hasheela

Abstract

This paper presents a multiple case study, which was aimed at identifying similarities and differences on how companies of different sizes operate after ERP system go live (post implementation phase). The study has found several differences and similarities and concluded that the differences are caused by the differences in company structures, sizes, financial constraints and decision making processes. Large Enterprises (LEs) often have in-house competence which Small and Medium-Sized Companies (SMEs) usually lack, and this leads to SMEs to depend on external sources, which makes the operations slightly different. SMEs also focus on their technical operations, often disregarding strategic planning, and this leads to higher risks.

References

  1. Andriole, S.J., 2006. The collaborate/integrate business technology strategy. Commun. ACM 49, 85-90. doi:10.1145/1125944.1125946.
  2. Buonanno, G., Faverio, P., Pigni, F., Ravarini, A., Sciuto, D., Tagliavini, M., 2005. Factors affecting ERP system adoption: A comparative analysis between SMEs and large companies. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 18, 384-426. doi:10.1108/17410390510609572.
  3. Chang, M.-K., Cheung, W., Cheng, C.-H., Yeung, J.H.Y., 2008. Understanding ERP system adoption from the user's perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 113, 928-942. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.08.011.
  4. Chen, I.J., 2001. Planning for ERP systems: analysis and future trend. Bus. Process Manag. J. 7, 374-386.
  5. Corbin, J., Strauss, A., 1990. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual. Sociol. 13, 3-21. doi:10.1007/BF00988593.
  6. Davenport, T.H., 1998. Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harv. Bus Rev 76, 121-131.
  7. El Sayed, M., Hubbard, N.J., Tipi, N., 2013. Evaluating enterprise resource planning (ERP) post implementation problems in Egypt: Findings from case studies of governmental, multinational and private Egyptian organisations. Presented at the LRN Annual Conference and PhD Workshop 2013, Birmingham, UK.
  8. Esteves, J., Pastor, J., 1999. An ERP Lifecycle-based Research Agenda, in: 1o International Workshop on Enterprise Management Resource and Planning Systems EMRPS. pp. 359-371.
  9. European Commission, 2005. The new SME definition [WWW Document]. URL http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/factsfigures-analysis/sme-definition/index_en.htm (accessed 10.9.14).
  10. Glaser, B., Strauss, A., 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Pub. Co.
  11. Hillman Willis, T., Hillary Willis Brown, A., 2002. Extending the value of ERP. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 102, 35-38.
  12. Hsin, C., Ching-Fang, W., 2005. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN SMES AND LARGE COMPANIES IN RELATION TO INTEGRATION TECHNOLOGIES ADOPTION, in: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Electronic Business. Hong Kong, pp. 839 - 848.
  13. Iacovou, C.L., Benbasat, I., Dexter, A.S., 1995. Electronic data interchange and small organizations: adoption and impact of technology. MIS Q 19, 465-485.
  14. Kiriwandeniya, I., Ruwan, V.U.., Samarasinghe, S.S.U., Samarakoon, S.M.P.., Kahandawarachchi, C., Thelijjagoda, S., 2013. Post implementation framework for ERP systems with special reference to Sri Lanka. Comput. Sci. Educ. ICCSE 2013 8th Int. Conf. On 508- 513. doi:10.1109/ICCSE.2013.6553963.
  15. Law, C.C.H., Ngai, E.W.T., 2007. ERP systems adoption: An exploratory study of the organizational factors and impacts of ERP success. Inf. Manage. 44, 418-432. doi:10.1016/j.im.2007.03.004.
  16. Lenart, A., 2011. ERP in the Cloud - Benefits and Challenges, in: Wrycza, S. (Ed.), Research in Systems Analysis and Design: Models and Methods, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 39-50.
  17. Levy, M., Powell, P., 2000. Information systems strategy for small and medium sized enterprises: an organisational perspective. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 9, 63- 84. doi:10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00028-7.
  18. Mantakas, M., Doukas, D., 2011. Business Process Orientation in Greek SMEs: Analysis of Manufacturing Processes and Their Enterprise System Implementations, in: Cruz-Cunha, M., Varajão, J., Powell, P., Martinho, R. (Eds.), ENTERprise Information Systems, Communications in Computer and Information Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 300-309.
  19. Markus, M.L., Tanis, C., 2000. The Enterprise System Experience - From Adoption to Success, in: Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future Through the Past. Pinnaflex Educational Resources inc., Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, pp. 173-207.
  20. Ng, C.S.P., 2001. A decision framework for enterprise resource planning maintenance and upgrade: a client perspective. J. Softw. Maint. 13, 431-468.
  21. Nicolaou, A., 2004. ERP Systems Implementation: Drivers of Post Implementation Success. Paper presented at the Decision Support, in: The IFIP TC8/WG8.3 International Conference.
  22. Peng, G., Nunes, J., 2010. Why ERP post-implementation fails? Lessons learned from a failure case in China, in: 14th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. PACIS 2010. Presented at the PACIS 2010, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 296 - 307.
  23. Ruivo, P., Oliveira, T., Neto, M., 2012. ERP Post-adoption: Use and Value - An Empirical Study on Portuguese SMEs, in: Rahman, H., Mesquita, A., Ramos, I., Pernici, B. (Eds.), Knowledge and Technologies in Innovative Information Systems, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 67-81.
  24. Seaman, C., 2008. Qualitative Methods, in: Shull, F., Singer, J., Sjøberg, D.K. (Eds.), Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering. Springer London, pp. 35-62.
  25. Shang, S., Seddon, P., 2000. A comprehensive framework for classifying the benefits of ERP Systems, in: Proceedings of the 6th Americas Conference on Information Systems. pp. 1005-1014.
  26. Soja, P., 2006. Success factors in ERP systems implementations: lessons from practice. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 19, 646-661. doi:10.1108/17410390610708517.
  27. Somers, T.M., Nelson, K.G., 2004. A taxonomy of players and activities across the ERP project life cycle. Inf. Manage. 41, 257-278. doi:10.1016/S0378- 7206(03)00023-5.
  28. Spanos, Y., Prastacos, G., Papadakis, V., 2001. Greek Firms and EMU:: Contrasting SMEs and Large-Sized Enterprises. Eur. Manag. J. 19, 638-648. doi:10.1016/S0263-2373(01)00089-5.
  29. Walsham, G., 1995. Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 4, 74-81.
  30. Westhead, P., Storey, D., 1996. Management Training and Small Firm Performance: Why is the Link So Weak? Int. Small Bus. J. 14, 13-24.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Hasheela V. (2015). On-premise ERP Organizational Post-implementation Practices - Comparison between Large Enterprises and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises . In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-758-096-3, pages 243-250. DOI: 10.5220/0005348802430250


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis15,
author={Victoria Hasheela},
title={On-premise ERP Organizational Post-implementation Practices - Comparison between Large Enterprises and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS,},
year={2015},
pages={243-250},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005348802430250},
isbn={978-989-758-096-3},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS,
TI - On-premise ERP Organizational Post-implementation Practices - Comparison between Large Enterprises and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises
SN - 978-989-758-096-3
AU - Hasheela V.
PY - 2015
SP - 243
EP - 250
DO - 10.5220/0005348802430250