Indirect Normative Conflict - Conflict that Depends on the Application Domain

Viviane Torres da Silva, Christiano Braga, Jean de Oliveira Zahn

Abstract

Norms are being used as a mechanism to regulate the behavior of autonomous, heterogeneous and independently designed agents. Norms describe what can be performed, what must be performed, and what cannot be performed in the multi-agent systems. Due to the number of norms specified to govern a multi-agent system, one important issue that has been considered by several approaches is the checking for normative conflicts. Two norms are said to be in conflict when the fulfillment of one norm violates the other and vice-versa. In this paper, we formally define the concept of an indirect normative conflict as a conflict between two norms that not necessarily have contradictory or contrary deontic modalities and that may govern (different but) related behaviors of (different but) related entities on (different but) related contexts. Finally, we present an ontology-based indirect norm conflict checker that automatically identifies direct and indirect norm conflicts on an ontology describing a set of norms and a set of relationships between the elements identified in the norms (behavior, entity and context).

References

  1. Cholvy, L. and Cuppens, F. (1995). Solving normative conflicts by merging roles. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 201-209.
  2. Dung, P. and Sartor, G. (2011). The modular logic of private international law. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 19(2-3):233-261.
  3. Elhag, A., Breuker, J., and Brouwer, B. (1999). On the formal analysis of normative conflicts. In The Twelfth Conference Legal Knowledge Based Systems, pages 35-46. GNI.
  4. Fenech, S., Pace, G., and Schneider, G. (2009). Automatic conflict detection on contracts. In Theoretical Aspects of Computing - ICTAC 2009, volume 5684 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 200-214. Springer.
  5. Figueiredo, K. and Silva, V. (2011). Modeling norms in multi-agent systems with norm-ml. In Coordination, Organization, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems IV, number 6541 in LNAI, pages 39-57. Springer.
  6. Gaertner, D., Garcia-Camino, A., Noriega, P., and Vasconcelos, W. (2007). Distributed norm management in regulated multi-agent systems. In International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 624-631. ACM.
  7. Garcia-Camino, A., Noriega, P., and Rodrigues-Aguilar, J. (2007). An algorithm for conflict resolution in regulated compound activities. In Engineering Societies in the Agents World VII, number 4457 in LNCS, pages 193-208. Springer.
  8. Giannikis, G. and Daskalopulu, A. (2009). Normative conflicts - patterns, detection and resolution. In International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, pages 527-532.
  9. Gunay, A. and Yolum, P. (2013). Engineering conflictfree multiagent systems. In Workshop on Engineering Multi-Agent Systems (EMAS), pages 192-207.
  10. Horling, B., Lesser, V., Vincent, R., Wagner, T., Raja, A., Zhang, S., Decker, K., and Garvey, A. (1999). The TAEMS White Paper.
  11. Horridge, M. and Bechhofer, S. (2011). The OWL API: A Java API for OWL ontologies. Semantic Web Journal (Special Issue on Semantic Web Tools and Systems), 2(1):11-21.
  12. Hubner, J., Sichman, J., and Boissier, O. (2007). Developing organised multiagent systems using the moise+ model: programming issues at the system and agent levels. International Journal of Agent Oriented Software Engineering, 1(3/4):370-395.
  13. Kollingbaum, M., Vasconcelos, W., Garcia-Camino, A., and Norman, T. (2008a). Conflict resolution in norm regulated environments via unification and constraints. In Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies V, number 4897 in LNCS, pages 158-174. Springer.
  14. Kollingbaum, M., Vasconcelos, W., Garcia-Camino, A., and Norman, T. (2008b). Managing conflict resolution in norm-regulated environments. In Engineering Societies in the Agents World VIII, number 4995 in LNCS, pages 55-71. Springer.
  15. Li, T., Balke, T., De Vos, M., Padget, J., and Satoh, K. (2013a). International conference on legal knowledge and information systems (jurix). In Legal Conflict Detection in Interacting Legal Systems.
  16. Li, T., Balke, T., De Vos, M., Satoh, K., and Padget, J. (2013b). Detecting conflicts in legal systems. In New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, number 7856 in LNCS, pages 174-189. Springer.
  17. Oren, N., Luck, M., Miles, S., and Norman, T. (2008). An argumentation inspired heuristic for resolving normative conflict. In Coordination, Organisations, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems, number 5428 in LNAI. Springer.
  18. Vasconcelos, W., Kollingbaum, M., and Norman, T. (2007). Resolving conflict and inconsistency in norm regulated virtual organizations. In International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 632-639. ACM.
  19. Vasconcelos, W., Kollingbaum, M., and Norman, T. (2009). Normative conflict resolution in multi-agent systems. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 19(2):124-152.
  20. Vasconcelos, W. and Norman, T. (2009). Contract formation through preemptive normative conflict resolution. In International Conference of the Catalan Association for Artificial Intelligence, pages 179-188. ACM.
  21. W3C (2004). The organization ontology.
  22. Weyns, D., Parunak, H., Michel, F., Holvoet, T., and Ferber, J. (2005). Environments for multiagent systems state-of-the-art and research challenges. In Environments for Multi-agent Systems, number 3374 in LNCS, pages 1-47. Springer.
  23. Wooldridge, M. (2000). Reasoning about Rational Agents. MIT Press.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Torres da Silva V., Braga C. and de Oliveira Zahn J. (2015). Indirect Normative Conflict - Conflict that Depends on the Application Domain . In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-758-096-3, pages 452-461. DOI: 10.5220/0005350304520461


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis15,
author={Viviane Torres da Silva and Christiano Braga and Jean de Oliveira Zahn},
title={Indirect Normative Conflict - Conflict that Depends on the Application Domain},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS,},
year={2015},
pages={452-461},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005350304520461},
isbn={978-989-758-096-3},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS,
TI - Indirect Normative Conflict - Conflict that Depends on the Application Domain
SN - 978-989-758-096-3
AU - Torres da Silva V.
AU - Braga C.
AU - de Oliveira Zahn J.
PY - 2015
SP - 452
EP - 461
DO - 10.5220/0005350304520461