Architectural Heritage Semantic Data Managing and Sharing in GIS

Elena Cerutti, Francesca Noardo, Antonia Spanò

Abstract

GIS can be effective instruments for managing Architectural Heritage data, in order to query the data for preservation purposes and to realize advanced analysis. These capabilities can be improved using some tools developed by the fields of informatics and internet services such as standards, ontologies and object-oriented programming. The official standards (languages and models) permit the encoding of data so that they can be effectively shared and integrated, concurrent with the knowledge and integration of data in Cultural Heritage (CH). Moreover, an even better interoperability of data can be achieved using open-source management software that normally features more standard data formats and can be used by everyone. These tools have been used in the research presented here for managing different kinds of data (spatial, non-spatial, images) on different views, in a unique database respecting the standards codes. In this way some schemas have been defined, and they can be exported to reach effective data interoperability.

References

  1. Scholl, M., Voisard, A., 1992. Object-oriented database systems for geographic applications: an experiment with O2. In: Proc. Int. Workshop on Database Management Systems for Geographical Applications, Springer.
  2. Gaede, V., Riekert, W.F., 1994. Spatial access methods and query processing in the object-oriented GIS GODOT. In: Proceedings of the AGDM'94 Workshop.
  3. Djindjian F., 1998, GIS usage in world-wide archaeology, in Archeologia e Calcolatori, 9, pp.19-30.
  4. Taboroff, J., 2000. Cultural heritage and natural disasters: incentives for risk management and mitigation. In: Managing Disaster Risk in Emerging Economies. World Bank. Disaster Management Risk, 2, pp. 71-79.
  5. Fonseca, F., Egenhofer, M., Davis, C., Camara, G., 2002. Semantic granularity. In: Ontology-driven geographic information systems. AMAI Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 36 (1-2), pp. 121-151.
  6. Mennis J.L., 2003. Derivation and implementation of a semantic GIS data model informed by principles of cognition. In: Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 27, pp. 455-479.
  7. Carbonara, G., Atlante del Restauro, UTET, 2004.
  8. Wüst, T., Nebiker, S., Landolt, R., 2004. Applying the 3D GIS DILAS to Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Projects Requirements and First Results. In: ISPRS Archive, 35(Part 5), pp.407-412.
  9. Worboys, M.F., Duckham M., 2004. GIS: a computing perspective. CRC press.
  10. Guizzardi, G., 2005. Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models. CTIT, Centre for Telematics and Information Technology.
  11. NorMaL, Norma tecnica UNI 11182: 2006. Beni Culturali. Materiali lapidei naturali ed artificiali. Descrizione della forma di alterazione.-Termini e definizioni.
  12. Doerr, M., Ore, Ch.E., Stead, S., 2007. In: The CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model - A New Standard for Knowledge Sharing. Tutorials, posters, panels and industrial contributions at the 26th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling - ACS, 83, 51- 56.
  13. Petrescu, F., 2007. The use of GIS technology in cultural heritage. In Proceedings of the XXI International CIPA Symposium, Athens, Greece, pp. 01-06.
  14. Meyer, É., Grussenmeyer, P., Perrin, J. P., Durand, A., & Drap, P., 2007. A web information system for the management and the dissemination of Cultural Heritage data. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 8(4), pp. 396-411.
  15. Guarino, N., Oberle, D., Staab, S., 2009. What is an Ontology? In Handbook on ontologies, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 1-17.
  16. De Laat, R., Van Berlo, L., 2011 Integration of BIM and GIS: The Development of the CityGML GeoBIM Extension, Advances in 3D Geo-Information Sciences. LNG&C, pp. 211-225.
  17. Blaško, M., Cacciotti, R., Kremen, P., & Kouba, Z. 2012. Monument damage ontology. In Progress in CulturaL Heritage Preservation. Springer B.H., pp. 221-230.
  18. Costamagna, E., Spanò, A., 2012. Semantic models for Architectural Heritage documentation. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, pp. 241-250.
  19. Apollonio F, Gaiani M, Benedetti B., 2012, 3D realitybased artefact models for the management of archaeological sites using 3D Gis: a framework starting from the case study of the Pompeii Archaeological area, Journal of Archaeological Science, 39, pp. 1271-1287.
  20. Cacciotti, R., Valach, J., Kuneš, P., Cernanský, M., Blaško, M., Kremen, P., 2013. Monument Damage Information System (Mondis): an ontological approach to Cultural Heritage documentation. In:ISPRS Annals, II-5/W1.
  21. Le Boeuf, P., Doerr, M., Ore, C.E., Stead, S., 2013. Definition of the CIDOC-CRM. Produced by the ICOM/CIDOC Documentation Standards Group Continued by the CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group. Version 5.1.2. pp. 12-13.
  22. Myers D., Avramides Y., Dalgity A., 2013. Changing the Heritage inventory paradigm, The ARCHES Open Source System, in Conservation Perspectives, The GCI newsletter, vol. 28, n.2.
  23. Spanò, A., Cerutti, E., Bartolozzi, C., Novelli, F., 2014. Worthy Outcomes from a System Advancing the Sharing of CH Data and Stakeholders' Relations. In: EuroMed 2014, LNCS 8740, Springer I.P.S. pp. 606-616.
  24. Chiabrando, F, Lingua, A, Noardo, F, Spanò A, 2014. 3D modelling of trompe l'oeil decorated vaults using dense matching techniques. In: ISPRS Annals, II-5, pp. 97-104.
  25. Rodríguez Miranda, Á., Valle Melón, J. M., Porcal Gonzalo, M. C., 2014. Design of tailored strategies for preservation and re-use of information about heritage. In: Euromed 2014 Proceedings ISBN:978 1 907132 47 6.
  26. inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/HILUCSValue/ Accessed on 02/12/2014.
  27. http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-index.html Accessed on 01/12/2014.
  28. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), OWL Web Ontology Language Guide, 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-guide-200402 10/ Accessed on 30/11/2014.
  29. http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/citygmlAccessed on 03/12/2014.
  30. http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/geosparqlAccess ed on 03/12/2014.
  31. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/OWL Accessed on 03/12/2014.
  32. www.w3.org/RDF/ Accessed on 03/12/2014.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Cerutti E., Noardo F. and Spanò A. (2015). Architectural Heritage Semantic Data Managing and Sharing in GIS . In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management - Volume 1: GISTAM, ISBN 978-989-758-099-4, pages 121-128. DOI: 10.5220/0005387801210128


in Bibtex Style

@conference{gistam15,
author={Elena Cerutti and Francesca Noardo and Antonia Spanò},
title={Architectural Heritage Semantic Data Managing and Sharing in GIS},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management - Volume 1: GISTAM,},
year={2015},
pages={121-128},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005387801210128},
isbn={978-989-758-099-4},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management - Volume 1: GISTAM,
TI - Architectural Heritage Semantic Data Managing and Sharing in GIS
SN - 978-989-758-099-4
AU - Cerutti E.
AU - Noardo F.
AU - Spanò A.
PY - 2015
SP - 121
EP - 128
DO - 10.5220/0005387801210128