Effects of Task Significance, Coordination and Incentive Mechanisms on Motivation of Online Teams

Juliana de Melo Bezerra, Lara Santos Diniz, Victor da Silva Montalvão, Celso Massaki Hirata

Abstract

Online teams are useful due to both flexibility and facility to gather resources originally dispersed. However, its intrinsic characteristic of separation in space and time imposes challenges to participation. Belief in task significance has positive effects on moving members to participate, while incentive mechanisms can be added to foster participation. Coordination is a central to a successful collaboration, since it guides members’ participation. As participation is driven by motivation, we focus on motivation. We conducted an experiment to analyze the effects on motivation of the following aspects: task significance, quality of team coordination, and usage of incentive mechanisms. We discuss the relevance of these aspects; the characteristics that make them contribute to or interfere on online motivation; as well as the interplay among the aspects that can increase or reduce the aspects’ effect.

References

  1. Allen, E. and Seaman, C. A., 2007. Likert Scales and Data Analyses. In Quality Progress, pp. 64-65.
  2. Bagozzi, R.P. and Dholakia, U.M., 2006. Open Source Software User Communities: A Study of Participation in Linux User Groups. In Management Science, 52:7, 2006, pp. 1099-1115.
  3. Beise, C. et al., 2010. A case study of project management practices in virtual settings. In ACM SIGMIS Database, 41:4, pp. 75-97.
  4. Bezerra, J. M. and Hirata, C.M., 2011. Motivation and its Mechanisms in Virtual Communities. In Proceeding of the 17th CRIWG Conference on Collaboration and Technology, pp. 57-72.
  5. Bezerra, J. M. and Hirata, C. M., 2012. Applying conflict management process to wiki communities. In Lecture Notes on Business Information Processing (LNBIP), 102.
  6. Bezerra, J. M., Hirata, C. M. and Battagello, A. A., 2012. Investigating Collaboration and Effectiveness of Virtual Teams with Distinct Organization Types. In Proceeding of the International Conference WWW/Internet.
  7. Bross, J., Sack, H. and Meinel, C., 2007. Encouraging Participation in Virtual Communities: The “IT-submitblog” Case. In IADIS International Journal on WWW/Internet, 2, pp. 113-129.
  8. Casey, V. and Richardson, I., 2006. Uncovering the reality within virtual software teams. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Global Software Development for the Practitioner (GSD), pp. 66-72.
  9. Chang, H. H. and Chuang, S.-S., 2011. Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: Participant involvement as a moderator. In Information and Management, 48, pp. 9-18.
  10. Clear, T. and Kassabova, D., 2005. Motivational Patterns in Virtual Team Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 7th Australasian Conference on Computing Education, 42, pp. 51-58.
  11. Crampton, C., 2001. The Mutual Knowledge Problem and its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration. In Organization Science, 12:3, pp. 346-371.
  12. Ellis, C., Gibbs, S.J. and Rein, G.L., 1991. Groupware: some issues and experiences. In Communications of the ACM, 34: 1, pp. 39-58.
  13. Fang, Y. and Neufeld, D., 2009. Understanding Sustained Participation in Open Source Software Projects. In Journal of Management Information Systems, 25:4, pp. 9-50.
  14. Fuks, H., Raposo, A., Gerosa, M. A., Pimentel, M., and Lucena, C.J.P., 2007. The 3C Collaboration Model. In The Encyclopedia of E-Collaboration, pp. 637-644.
  15. Grabowski, M. and Roberts, K. H., 1998. Risk Mitigation in Virtual Organizations. In Journal of ComputerMediated Communication (JCMC), 3:4, pp. 1-34.
  16. Gutierrez, F. Baloian, N. and Zurita, G., 2011. Boosting Participation in Virtual Communities. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Collaboration and Technology (CRIWG), pp. 14-29.
  17. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B. and Snyderman, B.B., 1959. The motivation to work. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  18. Jacob, S. M. and Sam, H. S., 2010. Analysis of Interaction Patterns and Scaffolding Practices in Online Discussion Forums. In Proceeding of the 4th International Conference on Distance Learning and Education (ICDLE), IEEE.
  19. Janzik, L. and Herstatt, C., 2008. Innovation communities: motivation and incentives for community members to contribute. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, 4, IEEE.
  20. Johnston, K. A. and Rosin, K., 2011. Global Virtual Teams: How to Manage Them. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer and Management (CAMAN), pp. 1-4.
  21. Kaiser, P. R., Tullar, W. L. and McKowen, D., 2000. Student Team Projects by Internet. In Business Communication Quartely, pp. 63-75.
  22. Karayaz, G., 2004. Dealing with Effectiveness on Virtual Team Research. In Proceedings of 25th Conference of American Society for Engineering Management (ASEM), pp. 242-247.
  23. Kim, A. J., 2000. Community building on the web: secret strategies for successful online communities. Peachpit Press.
  24. Kraut, R. E. and Resnick, P., 2008. Encouraging contribution to online communities, in: R.E. Kraut, R. E. and P. Resnick (Under contract), Evidence-based social design: Mining the social sciences to build successful online communities, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  25. Kuznetsov, S., 2006. Motivations of Contributors to Wikipedia. In ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 36:2.
  26. Piccoli, G., Powell A. and Ives, B., 2004. Virtual teams: team control structure, work processes, and team effectiveness. In Information Technology & People, 17:4, pp. 359-379.
  27. Powell, A., Piccoli, G. and Ives, B., 2004. Virtual Teams: A Review of Current Literature and Directions for Future Research. In ACM SIGMIS Database, 35:1, pp. 6-36.
  28. Robert, L. P., 2013. A Multi-level Analysis of the Impact of Shared Leadership in Diverse Virtual Teams. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'13), pp. 363- 374.
  29. Robey, D., Khoo, H. and Powers, C., 2000. Situated Learning in Cross-functional Virtual Teams. In IEEE Transactions on Professional Communications, 43:1, pp. 51-66.
  30. Staples, D. S. and Cameron, A. F., 2004. Creating Positive Attitudes in Virtual Team Members. Virtual & Collaborative Teams: Process, Technologies, & Practice, S. Godar and P. Ferris (Eds.), Idea Group Publishing, pp. 76-98.
  31. Tedjamulia, S. J. J., Dean, D. L., Olsen, D. R. and Albrecht, C.C., 2005. Motivating content contributions to online communities: toward a more comprehensive theory. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

de Melo Bezerra J., Santos Diniz L., da Silva Montalvão V. and Massaki Hirata C. (2015). Effects of Task Significance, Coordination and Incentive Mechanisms on Motivation of Online Teams . In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1: WEBIST, ISBN 978-989-758-106-9, pages 303-310. DOI: 10.5220/0005404803030310


in Bibtex Style

@conference{webist15,
author={Juliana de Melo Bezerra and Lara Santos Diniz and Victor da Silva Montalvão and Celso Massaki Hirata},
title={Effects of Task Significance, Coordination and Incentive Mechanisms on Motivation of Online Teams},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1: WEBIST,},
year={2015},
pages={303-310},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005404803030310},
isbn={978-989-758-106-9},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1: WEBIST,
TI - Effects of Task Significance, Coordination and Incentive Mechanisms on Motivation of Online Teams
SN - 978-989-758-106-9
AU - de Melo Bezerra J.
AU - Santos Diniz L.
AU - da Silva Montalvão V.
AU - Massaki Hirata C.
PY - 2015
SP - 303
EP - 310
DO - 10.5220/0005404803030310