Review-based Entity-ranking Refinement

Panagiotis Gourgaris, Andreas Kanavos, Christos Makris, Georgios Perrakis

Abstract

In this paper, we address the problem of entity ranking using opinions expressed in users’ reviews. There is an abundance of opinions on the web, which includes reviews of products and services. Specifically, we examine techniques which utilize clustering information, for coping with the obstacle of the entity ranking problem. Building on this framework, we propose a probabilistic network scheme that employs a topic identification method so as to modify ranking of results based on user personalization. The contribution lies in the construction of a probabilistic network which takes as input the belief of the user for each query (initially, all entities are equivalent) and produces a new ranking for the entities as output. We evaluated our implemented methodology with experiments with the OpinRank Dataset where we observed an improved retrieval performance to current re-ranking methods.

References

  1. Abdo, A., Leclere, V., Jacques, P., Salim, N., and Pupin, M. (2014). Prediction of new bioactive molecules using a bayesian belief network. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Volume 54, Issue 1, pp. 30-36.
  2. Acid, S., de Campos, L. M., Fernandez-Luna, J. M., and Huete, J. F. (2003). An information retrieval model based on simple bayesian networks. In International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Volume 18, pp. 251- 265.
  3. Amati, G. and van Rijsbergen, C. J. (2002). Probabilistic models of information retrieval based on measuring the divergence from randomness. In ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), Volume 20, Number 4, pp. 357-389.
  4. Antoniou, D., Plegas, Y., Tsakalidis A., Tzimas, G. and Viennas, E. (2012). Dynamic Refinement of Search Engines Results Utilizing the User Intervention. In Journal of Systems and Software, Volume 85, pp. 1577- 1587.
  5. Brandt, C., Joachims, T., Yue, Y., and Bank, J. (2011). Dynamic ranked retrieval. In WSDM, pp. 247-256.
  6. Dave, K., Lawrence, S., and Pennock, D. M. (2003). Mining the peanut gallery: Opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), pp. 519-528.
  7. Fang, H. and Zhai, C. (2007). Probabilistic models for expert finding. In European Conference on IR Research (ECIR), pp. 418-430.
  8. Ganesan, K. and Zhai, C. (2012). Opinion-based entity ranking. In Information Retrieval (IR), Volume 15, Issue 2, pp. 116-150.
  9. Kalervo Jarvelin, J. K. (2000). Ir evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents. In SIGIR, pp. 41-48.
  10. Lee, J.-W., Kim, H.-J., and Lee, S.-G. (2011). Exploiting taxonomic knowledge for personalized search: A bayesian belief network-based approach. In Journal of Information Science and Engineering (JISE), Volume 27, pp. 1413-1433.
  11. Liu, B. (2012). Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. Morgan and Claypool Publishers.
  12. Liu, T.-Y. (2011). Learning to rank for information retrieval. Springer.
  13. Lu, Y., Zhai, C., and Sundaresan, N. (2009). Rated aspect summarization of short comments. In International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), pp. 131-140.
  14. Ma, W. J., Beck, J. M., Latham, P. E., and Pouget, A. (2006). Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes. In Nature Neuroscience, Volume 9, pp. 1432-1438.
  15. Makris, C., Plegas, Y., Tzimas, G., and Viennas, E. (2013). Serfsin: Search engines results' refinement using a sense-driven inference network. In WEBIST, pp. 222- 232.
  16. Makris, C. and Panagopoulos, P. (2014). Improving opinion-based entity ranking. In WEBIST, pp. 223- 230.
  17. Meng, W., Yu, C. T., and Liu, K.-L. (2002). Building efficient and effective metasearch engines. In ACM Computing Surveys, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp. 48-89.
  18. Nasukawa, T. and Yi, J. (2003). Sentiment analysis: Capturing favorability using natural language processing. In International Conference on Knowledge Capture (KCAP), pp. 70-77.
  19. Niedermayer, I. S. P. D. (2008). An introduction to bayesian networks and their contemporary applications. In Springer Studies in Computational Intelligence, pp. 117-130.
  20. Pang, B. and Lee, L. (2004). A sentimental education: Sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 271-278.
  21. Pang, B. and Lee, L. (2005). Seeing stars: Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
  22. Prabowo, R. and Thelwall, M. (2009). Sentiment analysis: A combined approach. In Journal of Informetrics (JOI), Volume 3, Issue 2, pp. 143-157.
  23. Robertson, S. E. and Zaragoza, H. (2009). The probabilistic relevance framework: Bm25 and beyond. In Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp. 333-389.
  24. Teevan, J. B. (2001). Improving information retrieval with textual analysis: Bayesian models and beyond. In Masters Thesis, MIT Press.
  25. Turney, P. D. and Littman, M. L. (2003). Measuring praise and criticism: Inference of semantic orientation from association. In ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), Volume 21, Issue 4, pp. 315-346.
  26. Turtle, H. R. (1991). Inference networks for document retrieval. In Doctoral Dissertation.
  27. Wang, H., Lu, Y., and Zhai, C. (2010). Latent aspect rating analysis on review text data: A rating regression approach. In SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 783-792.
  28. Zhai, C. and Lafferty, J. D. (2001). A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to ad hoc information retrieval. In SIGIR, pp. 334342.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Gourgaris P., Kanavos A., Makris C. and Perrakis G. (2015). Review-based Entity-ranking Refinement . In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1: WEBIST, ISBN 978-989-758-106-9, pages 402-410. DOI: 10.5220/0005428604020410


in Bibtex Style

@conference{webist15,
author={Panagiotis Gourgaris and Andreas Kanavos and Christos Makris and Georgios Perrakis},
title={Review-based Entity-ranking Refinement},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1: WEBIST,},
year={2015},
pages={402-410},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005428604020410},
isbn={978-989-758-106-9},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1: WEBIST,
TI - Review-based Entity-ranking Refinement
SN - 978-989-758-106-9
AU - Gourgaris P.
AU - Kanavos A.
AU - Makris C.
AU - Perrakis G.
PY - 2015
SP - 402
EP - 410
DO - 10.5220/0005428604020410