Personalisation of MOOCs - The State of the Art

Ayse Saliha Sunar, Nor Aniza Abdullah, Su White, Hugh C. Davis

Abstract

Researchers in the field of educational technology are paying huge attention to the widespread adoption of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in the study of learning online. MOOCs are discussed in many angles including pedagogy, learning sustainability, and business model. However, there are very few discussions around MOOCs personalisation. In this paper, it is aimed to examine and analyse the literature on personalisation of MOOCs to identify the needs, the current states and efforts to personalise learning in MOOCs. The findings denote that the pedagogical design of MOOCs is currently insufficient due to massive and geographically dispersed learners with diverse educational backgrounds, learning requirements and motivations. Many believe that personalisation could address this lacking in MOOCs. Among the most popular services being proposed or implemented in the literature are personalised learning path, personalised assessment and feedback, personalised forum thread and recommendation service for related learning materials or learning tasks.

References

  1. Alario-Hoyos, C., Leony, D., Estévez-Ayres, I., PérezSanagustín, M., Gutiérrez-Rojas, I., and Kloos, C. D. (2014). Adaptive planner for facilitating the management of tasks in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the V Congreso Internacional sobre Calidad y Accesibilidad de la Formación Virtual, CAFVIR 2014, Antigua Guatemala, Guatemala, pp. 517-522.
  2. Amo, D. (2013, November). MOOCs: experimental approaches for quality in pedagogical and design fundamentals. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality, pp. 219-223, ACM.
  3. Aoki, K. (2013) Paradoxes between Personalisation and Massification: The Future of Education, Conference Proceedings 2013. 3rd Edition.
  4. Bain, K., Chan, B., and Bates, L. (2013). AMOOC: Improving Access to MOOCs using Speech Recognition. Retrieved from http:// liberatedlearning.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/ AMOOC_Apr_2013.pdf.
  5. Bansal, N. (2013). Adaptive recommendation system for MOOC (Doctoral dissertation, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay).
  6. Bassi, R., Daradoumis, T., Xhafa, F., Caballé, S., and Sula, A. (2014). Software Agents in Large Scale Open Elearning: A Critical Component for the Future of Massive Online Courses (MOOCs). SINCOS 2014, Salerno, Italy. September 10-12, 2014. In proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, pp. 184-188. IEEE Computer Society.
  7. Birari, N. (2014). Intelligent Tutoring System using Computerised Adaptive testing and interaction logs for MOOCs (Doctoral dissertation, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay).
  8. Blanco, Á. F., García-Peñalvo, F. J., and Sein-Echaluce, M. (2013, November). A methodology proposal for developing adaptive cMOOC. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality, pp. 553- 558, ACM.
  9. Brouns, F., Mota, J., Morgado, L., Jansen, D., Fano, S., Silva, A. and Teixeira, A. (2014a). A networked learning framework for effective MOOC design: the ECO project approach. In A. M. Teixeira, & A. Szücs (Eds.), 8th EDEN Research Workshop. Challenges for Research into Open & Distance Learning: Doing Things Better: Doing Better Things, pp. 161-171. Budapest, Hungary: EDEN. Oxford, United Kingdom.
  10. Brouns, F., Tammets, K., and Padrón-Nápoles, C. L. (2014b). How can the EMMA approach to learning analytics improve employability?. Retrieved from http://dspace.learningnetworks.org/bitstream/1820/554 2/1/submission9_M4WS.pdf.
  11. Burgos, D., and Corbí, A. (2014). A recommendation model on personalised learning to improve the user's performance and interaction in MOOCs and OERs. UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education. IITE 2014 International Conference. Oct 14th-15th, 2014. Moscow, Russia.
  12. Cavanaugh, J. (2013). The Coming Personalization of Postsecondary Education Competencies. CAEL 2013 Forum & News: Competency-Based Education, pp. 2- 5.
  13. Collet, P. (2013). POEM (Personalised Open Education for the Masses). Retrieved from http:// blog.educpros.fr/pierredubois/files/2013/07/Financem ent.pdf.
  14. Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3.
  15. Daradoumis, T., Bassi, R., Xhafa, F., and Caballé, S. (2013, October). A review on massive elearning (MOOC) design, delivery and assessment. In P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC), pp. 208-213. IEEE.
  16. De Maio, C., Loia, V., Mangione, G. R., and Orciuoli, F. (2014). Automatic Generation of SKOS Taxonomies for Generating Topic-Based User Interfaces in MOOCs. In Open Learning and Teaching in Educational Communities, pp. 398-403, Springer International Publishing.
  17. Elkherj, M. and Freund, Y. (2014, March). A system for sending the right hint at the right time. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference: pp. 219-220. ACM.
  18. Fasihuddin, H. A., Skinner, G. D., and Athauda, R. I. (2014) Personalizing Open Learning Environments through the adaptation to Learning Styles. ICITA 2014, 9th International Conference on Information Technology and Applications, Sydney, Australia, July 2014. ISBN: 978-0-9803267-6-5.
  19. Fasimpaur, K. (2013). Massive and Open. Learning and Leading with Technology March/April 2013, pp. 12- 17.
  20. Freeman, M. A. R. K., and Hancock, P. H. I. L. (2013). Milking MOOCs: Towards the right blend in accounting education. Academic Leadership Series, 4, 86-100.
  21. Godwin-Jones, R. (2014). Emerging Technologies Global Reach and Local Practice: the Promise of MOOCs. Announcements & Call for Papers, 5.
  22. Gutiérrez-Rojas, I., Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Leony, D., and Delgado-Kloos, C. (2014a). Scaffolding Self-learning in MOOCs. Proceedings of the Second MOOC European Stakeholders Summit, EMOOCs, 43-49.
  23. Gutiérrez-Rojas, I., Leony, D., Alario-Hoyos, C., PérezSanagustín, M., and Delgado-Kloos, C. (2014b) Towards an Outcome-based Discovery and Filtering of MOOCs using moocrank.
  24. Harman, K., and Koohang, A. (2013) MOOC 2050: A Futuristic Tour. Issues in Information Systems, 14 (2), pp. 346-352.
  25. Henning, P. A., Heberle, F., Streicher, A., Zielinski, A., Swertz, C., Bock, J., and Zander, S. (2014). Personalized Web Learning: Merging Open Educational Resources into Adaptive Courses for Higher Education. Personalization Approaches in Learning Environments, 55.
  26. Hollands, F. M. and Tirthali, D. (2014, May). MOOCs: Expectations and reality. Full report. Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education, Teachers College Columbia University. Retrieved from http:// cbcse.org/wordpress/wp- content/uploads/2014/05/ MOOCs_Expectations_and_Reality.pdf.
  27. Jona, K., and Naidu, S. (2014). MOOCs: Emerging Research. Distance Education, 35(2), pp.141-144.
  28. Kalz, M. (2014) (in press). Lifelong Learning and its support with new technologies. In Smelser, N. J. and Baltes P. B. (Eds.). International Encyclopaedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Pergamon: Oxford.
  29. Kalz, M., and Specht, M. (2013). If MOOCs are the answer-did we ask the right questions. Implications for the design of large-scale open online courses. Maastricht School of Management in its series Working Papers, 2013/25.
  30. Kay, J., Reimann, P., Diebold, E., and Kummerfeld, B. (2013). MOOCs: So Many Learners, So Much Potential... IEEE Intelligent Systems, 28(3), pp. 70-77.
  31. Ketamo, H. (2014, June). Learning Fingerprint: Adaptive Tutoring for MOOCs. In World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Vol. 2014, No. 1, pp. 2458- 2467.
  32. Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., and Schneider, E. (2013, April). Deconstructing Disengagement: Analyzing Learner Subpopulations In Massive Open Online Courses. In Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge: pp. 170-179. ACM.
  33. Knox, J. (2014). From MOOCs to Learning Analytics: Scratching the surface of the 'visual'. eLearn, 2014(11), 3.
  34. Knox, J., Ross, J., Sinclair, C., Macleod, H., and Bayne, S. (2014). MOOC Feedback: Pleasing All the People?. Invasion of the MOOCs, 98.
  35. Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., and Williams, S. A. (2013) MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), pp. 202-227.
  36. Martín, S., Peire, J., and Castro, M. (2013) Proyecto WePrendo. Retrieved from http://www.ieec.uned.es/ Investigacion/archivos/informe%20WEPRENDO_DI EEC.pdf.
  37. McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., & Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice. University of Prince Edward Island, 33.
  38. McLoughlin, C. E. (2013, June). The pedagogy of personalised learning: exemplars, MOOCS and related learning theories. In World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Vol. 2013, No. 1, pp. 266-270.
  39. Miranda, S., Mangione, G. R., Orciuoli, F., Gaeta, M., and Loia, V. (2013, October). Automatic generation of assessment objects and Remedial Works for MOOCs. In Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), pp. 1-8. IEEE.
  40. Shatnawi, S., Gaber, M. M., and Cocea, M. (2014a). Text stream mining for Massive Open Online Courses: review and perspectives. Systems Science & Control Engineering: An Open Access Journal, 2(1), pp. 664- 676.
  41. Shatnawi, S., Gaber, M. M., and Cocea, M. (2014b). Automatic content related feedback for MOOCs based on course domain ontology. In Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning-IDEAL 2014: pp. 27-35. Springer International Publishing.
  42. Shaw, C. (2012). Intelligent Tutors and Personalized Education. Retrieved from http://isites.harvard.edu/ fs/docs/icb.topic1283433.files/Shaw_12_rs.pdf.
  43. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International journal of instructional technology and distance learning, 2(1), pp. 3-10.
  44. Sonwalkar, N. (2013, September). The First Adaptive MOOC: A Case Study on Pedagogy Framework and Scalable Cloud Architecture-Part I. In MOOCs Forum, Vol. 1, No. P, pp. 22-29.
  45. Stevanovic, N. (2014) Effects Of Motivation On Performance Of Students In MOOC. SINTEZA 2014 Internet and Education. DOI:10.15308: pp. 418-422.
  46. Stine, J. K. (2013, April). MOOCs and executive education. In Presented at the Directors Conference. Retrieved from http://uniconexed.org/2013/research/ UNICON-Stine-Research-06-2013-final.pdf.
  47. Wilkowski, J., Deutsch, A., and Russell, D. M. (2014, March). Student skill and goal achievement in the mapping with google MOOC. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference, pp. 3-10. ACM.
  48. Yates, R. (2013). Educational Technologies to Support New Directions in Teaching Practice. International Journal of Information & Education Technology, 3(6).
  49. Yang, D., Piergallini, M., Howley, I., and Rose, C. (2014). Forum thread recommendation for massive open online courses. In Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Educational Data Mining.
  50. Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M., and Jakobs, H. (2014): MOOCs-a review of the state-of-the-art. Proceedings of the CSEDU 2014 conference, 3, pp. 9-20.
  51. Zhuhadar, L., and Butterfield, J. (2014). Analyzing Students Logs in Open Online Courses Using SNA Techniques. The 20th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2014, Savannah, Georgia, USA, August 7-9, 2014.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Sunar A., Abdullah N., White S. and C. Davis H. (2015). Personalisation of MOOCs - The State of the Art . In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-107-6, pages 88-97. DOI: 10.5220/0005445200880097


in Bibtex Style

@conference{csedu15,
author={Ayse Saliha Sunar and Nor Aniza Abdullah and Su White and Hugh C. Davis},
title={Personalisation of MOOCs - The State of the Art},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,},
year={2015},
pages={88-97},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005445200880097},
isbn={978-989-758-107-6},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,
TI - Personalisation of MOOCs - The State of the Art
SN - 978-989-758-107-6
AU - Sunar A.
AU - Abdullah N.
AU - White S.
AU - C. Davis H.
PY - 2015
SP - 88
EP - 97
DO - 10.5220/0005445200880097