Comparing Tool-supported Lecture Readings and Exercise Tutorials in Classic University Settings

Tenshi Hara, Felix Kapp, Iris Braun, Alexander Schill

Abstract

Teaching in classic courses offers too little interaction between docents and students and should be improved. Addressed approaches include a range from Simple Voting Systems to Clickers and Audience Response Systems, and interaction and Student motivation may be improved therein. However, different university course settings are affected in different ways by these systems. Therefore, this paper presents a comparison of a selected range of these systems (implemented as tool kits) within two course settings, namely lecture readings and exercise tutorials. These tools are Audience Response Systems, Question and Answer Systems (Q&A Systems), Discussion Systems (Panels), as well as Virtual Whiteboard Feedback Systems. A synopsis of feasibility for different settings is provided and concluded with important results on the distinguishability of Q&A Systems and Panels.

References

  1. Beatty, I. D., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., and Dufresne, R. J. (2006). Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching. American Journal of Physics, 74(1):31-39.
  2. Beier, L. (2014). Evaluating the Use of Gamification in Higher Education to Improve Students Engagement. Diploma thesis, Technische Universität Dresden.
  3. Beier, L., Braun, I., and Hara, T. (2014). auditorium - Frage, Diskutiere und Teile Dein Wissen! In GeNeMe 2014 - Gemeinschaften in Neuen Medien. GeNeMe.
  4. Brady, M., Seli, H., and Rosenthal, J. (2013). “clickers” and metacognition: A quasi-experimental comparative study about metacognitive self-regulation and use of electronic feedback devices. Computers & Education, 65:56-63.
  5. Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(1):9-20.
  6. Duncan, D. (2006). Clickers: A New Teaching Aid with Exceptional Promise. The Astronomy Education Review, 5(I):70-88.
  7. Feiten, L., Weber, K., and Becker, B. (2013). Smile: Smartphones in der lehre - ein rück- und Überblick. INFORMATIK, P(220):255-269.
  8. Kapp, F., , Braun, I., and Körndle, H. (2014a). Aktive Beteiligung Studierender in der Vorlesung durch den Einsatz mobiler Endgeräte mit Hilfe des Auditorium Mobile Classroom Services (AMCS). In Symposium auf dem 49. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie; Verbesserung von Hochschullehre: Beiträge der pädagogischpsychologischen Forschung. E. Seifried, C. Eckert, B. Spinath & K.-P. Wild (Chairs).
  9. Kapp, F., Braun, I., Körndle, H., and Schill, A. (2014b). Metacognitive Support in University Lectures Provided via Mobile Devices. In INSTICC; Proceedings of CSEDU 2014.
  10. Kapp, F., Damnik, G., Braun, I., and Körndle, H. (2014c). AMCS: a tool to support SRL in university lectures based on information from learning tasks. In Summerschool Dresden 2014.
  11. Lantz, M. E. (2010). The use of clickers in the classroom: Teaching innovation or merely an amusing novelty? Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4):556-561.
  12. Mayer, R. E., Stull, A., DeLeeuw, K., Almeroth, K., Bimber, B., Chun, D., Bulger, M., Campbell, J., Knight, A., and Zhang, H. (2009). Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1):51-57.
  13. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Instruction: A User's Manual. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, series in educational innovation edition.
  14. Moss, K. and Crowley, M. (2011). Effective learning in science: The use of personal response systems with a wide range of audiences. Computers & Education, 56(1):36-43.
  15. Prather, E. E. and Brissenden, G. (2009). Clickers as data gathering tools and students attitudes, motivations, and beliefs on their use in this application. Astronomy Education Review, 8(1).
  16. Seel, N. M. (2003). Psychologie des Lernens: Lehrbuch für P ädagogen und Psychologen, volume 8198. UTB, München, 2 edition.
  17. Weber, K. and Becker, B. (2013). Formative Evaluation des mobilen Classroom-Response-Systems SMILE. E-Learning zwischen Vision und Alltag (GMW2013 eLearning).
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Hara T., Kapp F., Braun I. and Schill A. (2015). Comparing Tool-supported Lecture Readings and Exercise Tutorials in Classic University Settings . In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-108-3, pages 244-252. DOI: 10.5220/0005451402440252


in Bibtex Style

@conference{csedu15,
author={Tenshi Hara and Felix Kapp and Iris Braun and Alexander Schill},
title={Comparing Tool-supported Lecture Readings and Exercise Tutorials in Classic University Settings},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,},
year={2015},
pages={244-252},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005451402440252},
isbn={978-989-758-108-3},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,
TI - Comparing Tool-supported Lecture Readings and Exercise Tutorials in Classic University Settings
SN - 978-989-758-108-3
AU - Hara T.
AU - Kapp F.
AU - Braun I.
AU - Schill A.
PY - 2015
SP - 244
EP - 252
DO - 10.5220/0005451402440252