Capability-based Planning with ArchiMate - Linking Motivation to Implementation

Adina Aldea, Maria Eugenia Iacob, Jos Van Hillegersberg, Dick Quartel, Henry Franken

Abstract

This paper proposes a methodology for capability-based planning (CBP) and investigates how it can be modelled with ArchiMate. This can be considered an important step in aligning Business and IT. By having a common language to express organisational plans, enterprise architects can engage business leaders to plan organisational change based on business outcomes, rather than projects, processes and applications. This is possible because CBP is centred on realising strategic goals by focusing on what an organisation can do, rather than how it can do it. In order to determine a methodology for CBP we look at current research and practice, and propose a generic set of steps. Based on this, we analyse the ArchiMate 2.1 Specification for suitability and propose the addition of the Capability and Metric concepts. In the last section we validate our proposed methodology and metamodel with the help of a case study.

References

  1. Aldea, A., Iacob, M.E., Van Hillegersberg, J., Quartel, D., Franken, H. & Bodenstaff, L., 2015. Modelling strategy with ArchiMate. In 30th ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC). Accepted.
  2. Audia, P.G., Locke, E.A. & Smith, K.G., 2000. The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Acad. of Man. J., 43, 837-853.
  3. Azevedo, C.L., Iacob, M.E., Almeida, J.P.A., Van Sinderen, M., Pires, L.F. & Guizzardi, G., 2013. An ontologybased well-founded proposal for modeling resources and capabilities in ArchiMate, In 17th IEEE EDOC, 39-48.
  4. Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17, 99-120.
  5. Danesh, M.H. & Yu, E., 2014. Modeling Enterprise Capabilities with i*: Reasoning on Alternatives. Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops, 2014, 112-123. Springer.
  6. Davis, P.K., 2002. Analytic architecture for capabilitiesbased planning, mission-system analysis, and transformation. DTIC Document.
  7. De Spiegeleire, S., 2011. Ten trends in capability planning for defence and security.The RUSI Journal, 156,20-28.
  8. Eisenhardt, K.M. & Martin, J.A., 2000. Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic management journal, 21, 1105-1121.
  9. Hales, D. & Chouinard, P., 2011. Implementing Capability Based Planning within the Public Safety and Security Sector. DTIC Document.
  10. Iacob, M.E., Quartel, D. & Jonkers, H., 2012. Capturing business strategy and value in enterprise architecture to support portfolio valuation. In 16th International EDOC, 11-20.
  11. Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J.C. & Groen, A. J., 2010. The resource-based view: a review and assessment of its critiques. Journal of management, 36, 349-372.
  12. Lee, H. & Song, Y.T., 2011. Bridging Enterprise Architecture Requirements to ArchiMate, Springer.
  13. Miklos, J., 2012. A meta-model for the spatial capability architecture. J. of Theoretical and Applied IT, 43.
  14. Open Group, 2011. TOGAF® Version 9.1, Van Haren.
  15. Open Group, 2013. ArchiMate® 2.1, Van Haren.
  16. Papazoglou, A. 2014. Capability-based planning with TOGAF® and ArchiMate®. Master thesis, University of Twente.
  17. Peffers, K., Tuunanen,T., Rothenberger,M.A. & Chatterjee, S., 2007. A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. of management information systems, 24, 45-77.
  18. Scott, J., 2009. Business Capability Maps: The Missing Link Between Business Strategy and IT Action. Architecture & Governance magazine.
  19. Stirna, J., Grabis, J., Henkel, M. & Zdravkovic, J., 2012. Capability driven development-An approach to support evolving organizations. The Practice of Enterprise Modeling. Springer.
  20. Taylor, B., 2005. Guide to Capability Based Planning. Meeting Proceedings of RTO-MP-SAS-055- Analytical Support to Defence Transformation: The RTO Studies, Analysis and Simulation Panel (SAS) Symposium, 26-28 April, 8-1.
  21. Teece, D. & Pisano, G., 1994. The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction. Industrial and corporate change, 3, 537-556.
  22. Ulrich, W. & Rosen, M., 2011. The Business Capability Map: The" Rosetta Stone" of Business/IT Alignment. Cutter Consortium, Enterprise Architecture, 24.
  23. Van Gils, B. & Van Dijk, S., 2014. The practice of enterprise architecture: experiences, techniques, and best practices, BiZZdesign Academy B.V.
  24. Zdravkovic, J., Stirna, J., Henkel, M. & Grabis, J., 2013. Modeling business capabilities and context dependent delivery by cloud services. Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Springer, 369-383.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Aldea A., Iacob M., Van Hillegersberg J., Quartel D. and Franken H. (2015). Capability-based Planning with ArchiMate - Linking Motivation to Implementation . In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-758-098-7, pages 352-359. DOI: 10.5220/0005468103520359


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis15,
author={Adina Aldea and Maria Eugenia Iacob and Jos Van Hillegersberg and Dick Quartel and Henry Franken},
title={Capability-based Planning with ArchiMate - Linking Motivation to Implementation},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2015},
pages={352-359},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005468103520359},
isbn={978-989-758-098-7},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - Capability-based Planning with ArchiMate - Linking Motivation to Implementation
SN - 978-989-758-098-7
AU - Aldea A.
AU - Iacob M.
AU - Van Hillegersberg J.
AU - Quartel D.
AU - Franken H.
PY - 2015
SP - 352
EP - 359
DO - 10.5220/0005468103520359