A Systematic Mapping Applied to MOOC's Study

Alexandre Furtado Fernandes, Jorge Cardoso, Maria José Marcelino


MOOC platforms are Web-based learning environments which allow a global participation on a large scale and with free access. The paradigm presents itself as a new teaching trend, changing the way education can be offered and funded worldwide. Many institutions are now investing in this teaching mode. However, since it is a web-based tool, the connection performance can impact both the way learning is experienced by the student as well as the operation of the platform. The “Quality of Experience” (QoE) concept has been widely used to refer to how users describe a service they have used while the “Quality of Service” (QoS) concept deals with the technical performance parameters that are associated with the connection quality. This paper starts the process of developing a systematic mapping around MOOC platforms, and QoS and QoE concepts, aiming to provide an overview of the current state of research on these issues.


  1. Drogseth, D. 2005. Business Alignment Starts with Quality of Experience. Business Communications Review (March), 60-64.
  2. Dursun, T.; Oskaybas, K.; Gökmen, C. 2013. The Quality of Service of The Distance Education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, V. 103, p. 1133-1151.
  3. Egerstedt, M. 2013. Controls for The Masses (Focus on Education).Control Systems, IEEE, V. 33, N. 4, p. 40- 44.
  4. G. Siemens, D. Cormier, A. McAuley, B. Stewart. 2010. The MOOC Model for Digital Practice. Acessado em 15/01/2014 em http://davecormier.com/edblog/ wpcontent/uploads/MOOC_Final.pdf.
  5. Kai Petersen, Robert Feldt, Shahid Mujtaba, and Michael Mattsson. 2008. Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering, in 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, 2008, pp. 71-80.
  6. Kalliris, G., Dimoulas, C., Veglis, A. A., Matsiola, M. 2011. Investigating Quality of Experience and Learning (QoE & Qol) of Audiovisual Content Broadcasting To Learners over Ip Networks. p. 836- 841.
  7. Kitchenham, B. & Charters, S. 2007, Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering, Technical Report EBSE-2007-01, School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Keele University.
  8. Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A. and Williams, S. A. 2013. MOOCs: a systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012.
  9. Menkovski, V.; Exarchakos, Georgios; Liotta, A. 2010. Online Qoe Prediction. In: Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), Second International Workshop On. p. 118-123.
  10. Menkovski, V. Et al 2010. Quality of Experience Models for Multimedia Streaming. International Journal of Mobile Computing and Multimedia Communications (IJMCMC), V. 2, N. 4, p. 1-20.
  11. Moebs, S., & Mcmanis, J. 2008. A Learner, Is A Learner, Is A User, Is A Customer-So What Exactly Do You Mean By Quality Of Experience?. Inproceedings Ah 2008 Workshop Technologies for Mobile and Wireless Adaptive Elearning Environments.
  12. Moebs, S. A. 2008. A Learner, Is A Learner, Is A User, is A Customer: Qos-Based Experience-Aware Adaptation. In: Proceedings of The 16th Acm International Conference On Multimedia. ACM, p. 1035-1038.
  13. Mota, R.; Inmorato, A. 2012. MOOC, uma revolução em curso. Jornal da ciência, nov. 2012. Disponível em: <http://www.jornaldaciencia.org.br/ Detalhe.jsp?id= 851>. Acesso em: fev. 2014.
  14. Muntean, V. H.; Otesteanu, M.; Muntean, G.-M. 2010. Qos Parameters Mapping For The E-Learning Traffic Mix In Lte Networks. In: Computational Cybernetics AND Technical Informatics (ICCC-CONTI), International Joint Conference On. p. 299-304.
  15. Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., & Mattsson, M. (2008). Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, Vol. 17, p. 1.
  16. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. 2006. Systematic reviews in the social sciences. A practical guide. European Psychologist, 11(3), p. 244-245.
  17. Rossi, R.; Mustaro, P. N. 2012. Applying Quality Approaches on Ict-Based Educational Products. Proceedings of Informing Science & IT Education Conference (InSITE). p. 249-264.
  18. Schmidt, D. C.; Mccormick, Z. 2013. Producing and Delivering A Coursera MOOC on Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture For Concurrent And Networked Software. In: Proceedings of the Companion Publication for Conference on Systems, Programming, & Applications: Software For Humanity. p. 167-176.
  19. Soldani, D., Li, M., & Cuny, R. (2007). QoS and QoE management in UMTS cellular systems. John Wiley & Sons.
  20. Wang, Y. Et al 2012. Evaluating the Quality of Distance Education Services by Using Modern Information Technology. In: Services Computing Conference. p. 192-199.
  21. Wieringa, R., Maiden, N. A. M., Mead, N. R. & Rolland, C. 2006. Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: a proposal and a discussion, Requir. Eng.11(1). p. 102-107.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Furtado Fernandes A., Cardoso J. and José Marcelino M. (2015). A Systematic Mapping Applied to MOOC's Study . In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-108-3, pages 444-449. DOI: 10.5220/0005483904440449

in Bibtex Style

author={Alexandre Furtado Fernandes and Jorge Cardoso and Maria José Marcelino},
title={A Systematic Mapping Applied to MOOC's Study},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,
TI - A Systematic Mapping Applied to MOOC's Study
SN - 978-989-758-108-3
AU - Furtado Fernandes A.
AU - Cardoso J.
AU - José Marcelino M.
PY - 2015
SP - 444
EP - 449
DO - 10.5220/0005483904440449