Towards an Integrated Conceptual Model for Cloud Adoption in Saudi Arabia

Nouf Alkhater, Victor Chang, Gary Wills, Robert Walters

Abstract

There are several advantages of utilising cloud computing in organisations such as cost saving and flexibility in acquiring resources. The use of cloud computing in developing countries, such as Saudi Arabia, is still in its early stages and has not been as widely adopted there as in developed countries. In fact, moving a current system to the cloud depends on many factors that may affect a Saudi Arabian organisation's decision to adopt the cloud. In order to encourage the adoption of cloud technology it is essential to understand why some enterprises are more prepared than others to move to the cloud. Hence, the aim of this research is to examine factors that might impact on a Saudi Arabian organisation's intention to adopt cloud computing. In this paper, we propose a conceptual model which integrates aspects of the Technology Organisation Environment (TOE) framework. The proposed model identifies the key factors that might influence organisations to employ cloud services. Our findings show that all the proposed factors in the cloud adoption model, except for competitive pressure and trading partner pressure, are statically significant.

References

  1. Alkhater, N., Wills, G. & Walters, R. 2014. Factors influencing an organisation's intention to adopt cloud computing in Saudi Arabia. IEEE 6thInternational Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science, pp. 1040-1044.
  2. Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A.D., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., Lee, G., Patterson, D., Rabkin, A., Stoica, I., et al. 2010. A view of cloud computing. Communications of the ACM, 53, pp. 50-58.
  3. Borgman, H. P., Bahli, B., Heier, H., & Schewski, F. 2013. Cloudrise: exploring cloud computing adoption and governance with the TOE Framework. 46thHawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4425-4435. IEEE doi:10.1109/HICSS.2013.132.
  4. Buyya, R., Yeo, C.S., Venugopal, S., Broberg, J. &Brandic, I.2009. Cloud computing and emerging IT platforms: Vision, hype and reality for delivering computing as the 5th utility. Future Generation Computer Systems, 25(6), pp. 599-616.
  5. Buyya, R., Calheiros, R. N. & Li, X. 2012. Autonomic cloud computing: Open challenges and architectural elements. 2012 Third International Conference on Emerging Applications of Information Technology, pp. 3-10. doi:10.1109/EAIT.2012.6407847.
  6. Chang, V., Walters, R. J., & Wills, G. (2013). The development that leads to the Cloud Computing Business Framework. International Journal of Information Management, 33(3),pp. 524-538.
  7. Chang, V. (2015). A proposed Cloud Computing Business Framework. ISBN: 9781634820172 (print), Nova publisher.
  8. Chau, P.Y.K. and Tam, K.T. 1997. Factors affecting the adoption of open systems: An exploratory study.MIS Quarterly, 21(1), pp. 1-24.
  9. Chen, X., Wills, G., Gilbert, L. and Bacigalupo, D. 2010. Using cloud for research: A technical review. JISC Final Report.
  10. Field, A. 2009. Discovering statistics using spss. 3rded. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
  11. Foster,I., Zhao, Y., Raicu, I.& Lu, S. 2008. Cloud computing and grid computing 360- degree compared. In: Grid Computing Environments Workshop (GCE'08), IEEE Press, pp. 1-10.
  12. Hajjat, M., Sun, X., Sung, Y.W.E., Maltz, D., Rao, S., Sripanidkulchai, K. & Tawarmalani, M. 2010. Cloudward bound: Planning for beneficial migration of enterprise applications to the cloud. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 40(4), pp. 243-254.
  13. Hao, W., Yen, I.-L. & Thuraisingham, B. 2009. Dynamic service and data migration in the cloud. 33rdAnnual IEEE International Computer Software and Applications Conference, pp. 134-139. doi:10.1109/COMPSAC.2009.127.
  14. Hinton, P. 2004. Statistics Explained: A Guide for Social Science Students. 2nded. Taylor & Francis.
  15. Hu, J. & Klein, A. 2009. A benchmark of transparent data encryption for migration of web applications in the cloud. 2009. Eighth IEEE International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, pp. 735-740. doi:10.1109/DASC.2009.85.
  16. Jeffery, K. and Neidecker-Lutz, B. 2010. The future of cloud computing opportunities for European cloud computing beyond. Expert Group Report, Public Version 1.0.
  17. Kaisler, S. and Money, W. H. 2011. Service migration in a cloud architecture. 44thHawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1-10. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2011.371.
  18. Khajeh-Hosseini, A., Greenwood, D. &Sommerville, I. 2010. Cloud migration: A case study of migrating an enterprise IT system to IaaS. IEEE 3rdInternational Conference on Cloud Computing, Cloud 2010, pp. 5- 10, July 2010: Miami, FL, USA.
  19. Khajeh-Hosseini, A., Sommerville, I., Bogaerts, J. & Teregowda, P. 2011. Decision support tools for cloud migration in the enterprise. IEEE 4thInternational Conference on Cloud Computing, pp. 541-548, (Khajeh-Hosseini et al. 2011a).
  20. Khajeh-Hosseini, A., Greenwood, D., Smith, J. W. &Sommerville, I. 2011. The cloud adoption toolkit: Supporting cloud adoption decisions in the enterprise. Software: Practice and Experience, 42(4), (KhajehHosseini et al. 2011b).
  21. Klems, M., Nimis, J. & Tai, S. 2009. Do clouds compute? A framework for estimating the value of cloud computing. Designing E-Business Systems. Markets, Services and Networks, pp. 110-123. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  22. Low, C., Chen, Y. & Wu, M. 2011. Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption. Industrial Management & Data Systems, (111)7, pp. 1006-1023. doi:10.1108/02635571111161262.
  23. Marston, S., Li, Z., Bandyopadhyay, S., Zhang, J. & Ghalsasi, A. 2011. Cloud computing-The business perspective. Decision Support Systems, (51)1, pp. 176-189. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.006.
  24. Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of innovation. 4thed. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  25. Scott, W.R. and Christensen, S. 1995. The institutional construction of organizations: International and longitudinal studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  26. Scott, W.R. 2001. Institutions and organizations. 2nded. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  27. Tessmer, M. 1993. Planning and conducting formative evaluations. London: Kogan Page.
  28. Tornatzky, L.G. and Fleischer, M. 1990. The process of technological innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Alkhater N., Chang V., Wills G. and Walters R. (2015). Towards an Integrated Conceptual Model for Cloud Adoption in Saudi Arabia . In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Emerging Software as a Service and Analytics - Volume 1: ESaaSA, (CLOSER 2015) ISBN 978-989-758-110-6, pages 80-85. DOI: 10.5220/0005528400800085


in Bibtex Style

@conference{esaasa15,
author={Nouf Alkhater and Victor Chang and Gary Wills and Robert Walters},
title={Towards an Integrated Conceptual Model for Cloud Adoption in Saudi Arabia},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Emerging Software as a Service and Analytics - Volume 1: ESaaSA, (CLOSER 2015)},
year={2015},
pages={80-85},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005528400800085},
isbn={978-989-758-110-6},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Emerging Software as a Service and Analytics - Volume 1: ESaaSA, (CLOSER 2015)
TI - Towards an Integrated Conceptual Model for Cloud Adoption in Saudi Arabia
SN - 978-989-758-110-6
AU - Alkhater N.
AU - Chang V.
AU - Wills G.
AU - Walters R.
PY - 2015
SP - 80
EP - 85
DO - 10.5220/0005528400800085