An Automated Semantic Annotation Tool Supported by an Ontology in the Computer Science Domain

Rodrigo Espinoza, Andrés Melgar

2015

Abstract

The annotation of documents can be performed manually, semi-assisted or automated, also it can use the help of different knowledge resources as a set of rules or ontology. In this paper, we show the design of a semantic annotation tool that works automatically on power in order to efficiently manage academic documents in spanish produced in the university related to computer science. The tool uses an ontology annotations to provide a corpus of documents the necessary attributes to be managed using other tools that use annotations as searchers or indexers. This is done by relating the concepts found in documents with concepts in the ontology performing semantic and syntactic comparisons, it is produced using open source tools for natural language processing and knowledge management.

References

  1. Agosti, M. and Ferro, N. (2007). A formal model of annotations of digital content. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 26(1):3.
  2. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O., et al. (2001). The semantic web. Scientific american, 284(5):28-37.
  3. Chechev, M., Gonzàlez, M., Màrquez, L., and Espan˜aBonet, C. (2012). The patents retrieval prototype in the molto project. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference companion on World Wide Web, pages 231-234. ACM.
  4. Corcho, O. (2006). Ontology based document annotation: trends and open research problems. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 1(1):47-57.
  5. Daconta, M. C., Obrst, L. J., and Smith, K. T. (2003). The semantic web: a guide to the future of XML, web services, and knowledge management. John Wiley & Sons.
  6. Davies, J., Fensel, D., and Van Harmelen, F. (2003). Towards the semantic web. Ontology-Driven Knowledge Management. Chichester.
  7. Gruber, T. R. (1995). Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? International journal of human-computer studies, 43(5):907-928.
  8. Hotho, A., Staab, S., and Stumme, G. (2003). Ontologies improve text document clustering. In Third IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pages 541- 544. IEEE.
  9. Jain, V. and Singh, M. (2013). Ontology development and query retrieval using protégé tool. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications (IJISA), 5(9):67.
  10. Joksimovic, S., Jovanovic, J., Gasevic, D., Zouaq, A., and Jeremic, Z. (2013). An empirical evaluation of ontology-based semantic annotators. In Proceedings of the seventh international conference on Knowledge capture, pages 109-112. ACM.
  11. Marshall, C. C. (1998). Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation. In Proceedings of the ninth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia: links, objects, time and space-structure in hypermedia systems: links, objects, time and space-structure in hypermedia systems, pages 40-49. ACM.
  12. Meena, E., Kumar, A., and Romary, L. (2004). An extensible framework for efficient document management using rdf and owl. In Proceeedings of the Workshop on NLP and XML (NLPXML-2004): RDF/RDFS and OWL in Language Technology, pages 51-58. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  13. Padro, L. and Stanilovsky, E. (2012). Freeling 3.0: Towards wider multilinguality. In Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2012), Istanbul, Turkey. ELRA.
  14. Pérez, J., Arenas, M., and Gutierrez, C. (2006). Semantics and complexity of sparql. In The Semantic Web-ISWC 2006, pages 30-43. Springer.
  15. Pipitone, A. and Pirrone, R. (2010). A framework for automatic semantic annotation of wikipedia articles. In 6th Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives.
  16. Srivastava, D. and Velegrakis, Y. (2007). Intensional associations between data and metadata. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, pages 401-412. ACM.
  17. Studer, R., Decker, S., Fensel, D., and Staab, S. (2000). Situation and perspective of knowledge engineering. Knowledge Engineering and Agent Technology, pages 237-252IOS.
  18. Uren, V., Cimiano, P., Iria, J., Handschuh, S., Vargas-Vera, M., Motta, E., and Ciravegna, F. (2006). Semantic annotation for knowledge management: Requirements and a survey of the state of the art. Web Semantics: science, services and agents on the World Wide Web, 4(1):14-28.
  19. Wolfe, J. L. (2000). Effects of annotations on student readers and writers. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Digital libraries, pages 19-26. ACM.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Espinoza R. and Melgar A. (2015). An Automated Semantic Annotation Tool Supported by an Ontology in the Computer Science Domain . In Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management - Volume 2: KEOD, (IC3K 2015) ISBN 978-989-758-158-8, pages 133-138. DOI: 10.5220/0005577801330138


in Bibtex Style

@conference{keod15,
author={Rodrigo Espinoza and Andrés Melgar},
title={An Automated Semantic Annotation Tool Supported by an Ontology in the Computer Science Domain},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management - Volume 2: KEOD, (IC3K 2015)},
year={2015},
pages={133-138},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005577801330138},
isbn={978-989-758-158-8},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management - Volume 2: KEOD, (IC3K 2015)
TI - An Automated Semantic Annotation Tool Supported by an Ontology in the Computer Science Domain
SN - 978-989-758-158-8
AU - Espinoza R.
AU - Melgar A.
PY - 2015
SP - 133
EP - 138
DO - 10.5220/0005577801330138