Ontology Modelling of Malaysian Food Exchange List

Norlia Yusof, Shahrul Azman Noah, Samirah Taufiq Wahid

Abstract

Designing dietary menu planning is a complex problem-solving task. It involves several constraints and extensive common sense. Case-based reasoning (CBR) solves the complexity by storing an expert common sense in the case base. Case adaptation (CA) is important for design task using CBR since old cases are partially similar as a current one. An automatic CA mainly focused on the processing level rather than at the data level. On the other hand, semantic technology (ST) inserts the intelligence features by shifting the focus on the application code to the data. This can leverage the burden on the logical processing of adaptation engine. Ontology is a prerequisite in ST. Thus, this research proposes a computational model of design CA using an ontological approach. This paper discusses the experience we gained during the process of ontology modelling based on the OD101 method. The Malaysian food ontology was successfully developed to make the domain assumptions explicit in supporting the reasoning process of case adaptation for dietary menu planning recommendation.

References

  1. Brusa, G., Caliusco, M. L. & Chiotti, O., 2007. Enabling Knowledge Sharing within e-Government Back-Office Through Ontological Engineering. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 2(1), pp.33-48.
  2. Cantais, J. et al., 2005. An example of food ontology for diabetes control. In International Semantic Web Conference 2005 workshop on Ontology Patterns for the Semantic Web.
  3. Chien-Yeh, H. et al., 2011. A Web-Based Decision Support System for Dietary Analysis and Recommendations. Telemedicine and e-Health, 17(2), pp.68-75.
  4. Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M. & Corcho, O., 2004. Ontological Engineering?: with examples from the areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web. Second. X. Wu & L. Jain, eds., Springer-Verlag London.
  5. Hebeler, J. et al., 2009. Semantic Web Programming M. Dean, ed., Indiapolis, Indiana: Wiley Publishing, Inc.
  6. Horridge, M., 2011. A Practical Guide to Building OWL Ontologies using Protege 4 and CO-ODE Tools, p.107.
  7. Kim, E., 2012. Korean Food Ontology. In Seventh International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems. p. Poster Presentation.
  8. Kovacic, K. J., 1995. Using Common-Sense Knowledge for Computer Menu Planning. Case Western Reserve University.
  9. Lee, C., Wang, M., Acampora, G., et al., 2010. Diet Assessment Based on Type-2 Fuzzy Ontology and Fuzzy Markup Language. , 25, pp.1187-1216.
  10. Lee, C., Wang, M. & Hagras, H., 2010. A Type-2 Fuzzy Ontology and Its Application to Personal DiabeticDiet Recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 18(2), pp.374-395.
  11. Marling, C. R., 1996. Integrating Case-Based and RuleBased Reasoning in Knowledge-Based Systems Development. Case Western Reserve University.
  12. Marling, C. R., Petot, G. J. & Sterling, L. S., 1999. Integrating Case-Based and Rule-Based Reasoning to Meet Multiple Design Constraints. Computational Intelligence, 15(3), pp.308-332.
  13. Noah, S. A. et al., 2004. DietPal?: A Web-Based Dietary Menu-Generating and Management System. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 6(1), p.13.
  14. Noy, N. F. & Mcguinness, D. L., 2001. Ontology Development 101?: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. In Stanford Medical Informatics Technical Report SMI-2001-0880. pp. 1-25.
  15. Pizzuti, T. et al., 2014. Food Track & Trace ontology for helping the food traceability control. Journal of Food Engineering, 120, pp.17-30.
  16. Saludin, F. A., Zakaria, N. & Husain, W., 2010. User Requirement Analysis for Personalized Cancer Dietary Planning and Menu Construction. In IEEE Conference on Biomedical Engineering & Sciences. pp. 410-416.
  17. Tee, E. S. et al., 1997. Nutrient Composition of Malaysian Foods 4th Editio., Kuala Lumpur: Institute for Medical Research.
  18. Tumnark, P., Oliveira, L. & Santibutr, N., 2013. Ontology-Based Personalized Dietary Recommendation for Weightlifting. In 2013 International Workshop on Computer Science in Sports. Atlantis Press, pp. 44-49.
  19. Uschold, M. & Gruninger, M., 1996. Ontologies?: Principles , Methods and Applications. Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(February), p.50.
  20. Warshaw, H. S., 2010. Diabetes Meal Planning Made Easy 4th ed. R. Renshaw, ed., American Diabetes Association, Inc.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Yusof N., Noah S. and Wahid S. (2015). Ontology Modelling of Malaysian Food Exchange List . In Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management - Volume 2: KEOD, (IC3K 2015) ISBN 978-989-758-158-8, pages 301-306. DOI: 10.5220/0005615003010306


in Bibtex Style

@conference{keod15,
author={Norlia Yusof and Shahrul Azman Noah and Samirah Taufiq Wahid},
title={Ontology Modelling of Malaysian Food Exchange List},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management - Volume 2: KEOD, (IC3K 2015)},
year={2015},
pages={301-306},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005615003010306},
isbn={978-989-758-158-8},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management - Volume 2: KEOD, (IC3K 2015)
TI - Ontology Modelling of Malaysian Food Exchange List
SN - 978-989-758-158-8
AU - Yusof N.
AU - Noah S.
AU - Wahid S.
PY - 2015
SP - 301
EP - 306
DO - 10.5220/0005615003010306