Increasing the Amount of Knowledge Reuse from Engineering Design Repositories - A Research on the Needs and Behaviours of Novice Designers

Cristina Carro Saavedra, Udo Lindemann

Abstract

Engineering design is a knowledge-intensive activity that can be supported by knowledge reuse. Knowledge reuse is especially relevant for novice designers that are not familiarized with the specific knowledge of the company. Companies make efforts acquiring and storing their knowledge but this knowledge is usually not applied and reminds unused in the repositories, especially during early phases of design. The reasons for the lack of reuse are still unclear. A shortcoming of current studies about barriers for knowledge reuse is that they do not deepen enough in the barriers existing at the level of designers. More understanding of designers’ needs and behaviours while reusing knowledge from company’s repositories is required. This research presents an approach based on design workshops and interviews in order to gain more understanding on the phenomena. Influent factors for novice designers during reuse from repositories, situations for knowledge reuse and types of knowledge to be reused will be analysed. Based on these insights, an approach to support novice designers for knowledge reuse is proposed. The support will be evaluated in iterative design experiments.

References

  1. Ahmed, S., Wallace, K., Blessing, L., 2000. Identifying differences between novice and experienced designers. Proceedings of Engineering Design Conference, Brunel University, Uxbridge, pp. 97-106.
  2. Ahmed, S., Wallace, K. M., 2004. Identifying and supporting the knowledge needs of novice designers within the aerospace industry. Journal of Engineering Design, 15:5, 475-492.
  3. Alavi, M., Leidner, D. E., 2001. Knowledge management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136.
  4. Bhatta, S. R., Goel, A. K., 2002. Design patterns and creative design. In Chakrabarti, A., Engineering Desing Synthesis. Understanding, Approaches and Tools (pp. 271-284). London: Springer.
  5. Baxter, D., Gao, J., Case, J., Harding, J., Young, B., Cochrane, S., Dani, S., 2007. An Engineering Design Knowledge Reuse Methodology Using Process Modelling. Research in Engineering Design, 18(1), 37-48.
  6. Blessing, L. and Wallace, K. 2000. Supporting the Knowledge Life Cycle. MIT Sloan Management Review, pp. 75-83.
  7. Blessing, L., Chakrabarti, A., 2009. DRM, a Design Research Methodology. Springer. London.
  8. Carro Saavedra, C., Fernández Miguel, R. and Lindeman, U., 2015. A worker-centered model to understand the factors influencing knowledge application. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Knowledge Management, 04-06 November, Osaka.
  9. Chirumalla, K., 2013. Development of a Methodology for Lessons Learned Practice. From post-project learning to continuous process-based approach. Doctoral Thesis. Lulea University of Technology.
  10. Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T., 1979. Quasiexperimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
  11. Cross, M. S., Sivaloganathan, S., 2007. Specialist knowledge identification, classification, and usage in company-specific new product development processes. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture.
  12. Dani, S., Harding, J. A., Case, K., Young, R. I. M., Cochrane, S., Gao, J., Baxter, D., 2006. A methodology for best practice knowledge management. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 220(10), pp. 1717-1728.
  13. Davenport, T. H., De Long, D. W., Beers, M. C, 1998. Successful Knowledge Management Projects. Sloan Management Review, 39(2), 43-57.
  14. Davenport, T. H, Prusak, L., 1998. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage what They Know. Harvard Business School Press. Boston.
  15. De Long, D. W., Fahey, L., 2000. Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management. Academy of Management Executive, 14(4), 113-127.
  16. Duffy, S. M., Duffy, A. H. B., MacCallum, K. J., 1995. A Design Reuse Model. Proceedings of ICED 95, Prague, 490-495.
  17. Fruchter, R., Demian, P., 2002. Knowledge Management for Reuse. International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction. 12-14 June, Aarhus School of Architecture.
  18. Gainsburg, J., Rodríguez-Lluesma, C., Bailey, D. E., 2010. A “knowledge profile” of an engineering occupation: temporal patterns in the use of engineering knowledge. Engineering Studies, 2:3, 197-219.
  19. Grant, R. M., 1996a. Prospering in Dynamicallycompetitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375-387.
  20. Grant, R. M., 1996b. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109-122.
  21. Ichijo, K., Nonaka, I., 2007. Knowledge Creation and Management: New Challenges for Managers. Oxford University Press. New York.
  22. Johansson, C., Frostevarg, J., Kaplan, A. F. H., Bertoni, M., Chirumalla, K., 2012. 3rd IEEE International Conference on Congnitive Infocommunications. December 2-5, Kosice, Slovakia.
  23. Manohar Singh, R., Gupta, M., 2014. Knowledge management in teams: empirical integration and development of a scale. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(4), 777-794.
  24. Markus, M. L., 2001. Toward a Theory of Knowledge Reuse: Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success. Journal of Management Information Systems (18:1). Pp. 57-93.
  25. McMahon, C., Lowe, A., Culley, S., 2004. Knowledge management in engineering design: personalization and codification. Journal of Engineering Design, 15(4), 307-325.
  26. Milton, N., 2010. The Lessons Learned Handbook. Practical Knowledge-Based Approach to Learning from Experience. Chandos Publishing, Oxford.
  27. Nonaka, I., 1991. The Knowledge-Creating Company. Harvard Business Review, 69 (6), 96-104
  28. Nonaka, I., 1994. A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1),14-37.
  29. Polanyi, M., 1962. Personal Knowledge: Towards a PostCritical Philosophy. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
  30. Polanyi, M., 1966. The Tacit Dimension. Anchor Day Books. New York.
  31. Ponn, J., 2007. Situative Unterstützung der methodischen Konzeptentwicklung technischer Produkte. Doctoral Thesis. Technische Universität München.
  32. Probst, G., Gaub, S., Romhardt, K., 1998. Wissen Managen: Wie Unternehmen ihre wertvollste Ressource optimal nutzen, Gabler Verlag. Frankfurt.
  33. Ranjbarfard, M., Aghdasi, M., López-Sáez, P., Emilio Navas, J., 2014. The barriers of knowledge generation, storage, distribution and application that impede learning in gas and petroleum companies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(3), 494-522.
  34. Sim, S. K., Duffy, A. H. B, 2003. Towards an ontology of generic engineering design activities. Research on Engineering Design, 14, 200-223.
  35. Wallace, K., Ahmed, S., Bracewell, R., 2005. Engineering knowledge management. In Clarkson, J., Eckert, C., Design process improvement. A review of current practice (pp. 326-343). London: Springer.
  36. Von Krogh, G., 1998. Care in Knowledge Creation. California Management Review, v40, 133-154.
  37. Zack, M. H., 1999a. Developing a Knowledge Strategy. California Management Review, 41(3), 125-145.
  38. Zack, M. H., 1999b. Managing Codified Knowledge. Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 45-58.
  39. Zack, M. H., 2003. Rethinking the Knowledge-Based Organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 67-71.
  40. Zack, M. H., McKeen, J., Singh, S., 2009. Knowledge management and organizational performance: an exploratory analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(6), 392-409.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Carro Saavedra C. and Lindemann U. (2015). Increasing the Amount of Knowledge Reuse from Engineering Design Repositories - A Research on the Needs and Behaviours of Novice Designers . In Doctoral Consortium - DC3K, (IC3K 2015) ISBN , pages 21-30. DOI: 10.5220/0005652500210030


in Bibtex Style

@conference{dc3k15,
author={Cristina Carro Saavedra and Udo Lindemann},
title={Increasing the Amount of Knowledge Reuse from Engineering Design Repositories - A Research on the Needs and Behaviours of Novice Designers},
booktitle={Doctoral Consortium - DC3K, (IC3K 2015)},
year={2015},
pages={21-30},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005652500210030},
isbn={},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Doctoral Consortium - DC3K, (IC3K 2015)
TI - Increasing the Amount of Knowledge Reuse from Engineering Design Repositories - A Research on the Needs and Behaviours of Novice Designers
SN -
AU - Carro Saavedra C.
AU - Lindemann U.
PY - 2015
SP - 21
EP - 30
DO - 10.5220/0005652500210030