Critical Success Factors for the of Acceptance and Use of an LMS - The Case of e-CLASS

Stavros Valsamidis, Ioannis Kazanidis, Vasilios Aggelidis, Sotirios Kontogiannis, Alexandros Karakos

Abstract

Nowadays, as e-learning is increasingly used in education, it is useful to know what are the critical factors for its successful implementation in higher education institutes. This research has two main objectives. The initial objective is to clarify and categorize the Critical Success Factors (CSF) of education with the use of a Learning Management System (LMS) from the perspective of students and then to investigate the relationships among these factors, suggesting a new causal model. To achieve the above objectives, an extensive, detailed and systematic study of available literature sources was held. Then, the critical success factors were separated in four (4) broad categories: instructors' characteristics, students' characteristics, information and communications technology used and technical support provided by the technical staff. Each factor contains a number of deterministic variables which were adopted mainly by previous studies. Also, for the collection of data for analysis, a questionnaire was distributed to students who use the LMS. Technical multivariate analysis was used to examine the relevance of each variable determinant factor, while for the evaluation of the causal model, structural equation systems were used.

References

  1. Abbad, M. M., Morris, D., and de Nahlik, C., 2009. Looking under the Bonnet: Factors Affecting Student Adoption of e-Learning Systems in Jordan, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10, 2., ISSN: 1492-3831
  2. Al-Fadhli, S., 2009. Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Distance Learning: A Case Study of Arab Open University in Kuwait. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12, 3.
  3. Bollen, K. A., 1989.Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. New York: Wiley.
  4. Claroline (2010). Retrieved January 05, 2010 from http://www.claroline.net.
  5. Dillon, L., and Gunawardena, C., 1995. A framework for the evaluation of telecommunications based distance education in Stewart, D. (Ed.), Selected Papers from the 17th Congress of the International Council for Distance Education, 2, 348 51. Open University, Milton Keynes.
  6. Drennan, J., Kennedy, J. and Pisarki, A., 2005. Factors affecting student attitudes toward flexible online learning in management education. Journal of Educational Research, 98 6, 331-338.
  7. Freund, Y. P., 1988. Critical success factors. Planning Review, 16, 4, 20-25. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb054225.
  8. Friesen, N., 2005. Interoperability and Learning Objectives: An Overview of eLearning Standardization. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects.1, 22-31.
  9. Frimpon, M., 2011. A Re-Structuring of the Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation Process. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3, 1.
  10. Govindasamy, T. 2002. Successful implementation of eLearning; Pedagogical considerations. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3-4), 287-299.
  11. Grapentine, T., 1997. Managing multicollinearity. Marketing Research. 9, 3, 10-21.
  12. Grapentine, T., 2000. Path analysis vs. structural equation modelling: do the relative merits of path analysis and structure equation modelling outweigh their limitations? Marketing Research, 12, 312 -20.
  13. Green, S.B., Thompson, M.S., and Poirier, J., 1999. Exploratory Analyzes to Improve Model Fit: Errors Due to Misspecification and a Strategy to Reduce Their Occurrence. Structural Equation Modelling.6, 1, 113-126.
  14. GUNet. 2015. OPEN eClass, Retrieved May 15, 2015 from http://eclass.gunet.gr/.
  15. Hara, N., and Kling, R., 1999. Students' frustrations with a web-based distance education course. First Monday, 4(12), 5.
  16. Ingram, H., Biermann, K., Cannon, J., Neil, J., and Waddle, C., 2000. Internalizing action learning: a company perspective. Establishing critical success factors for action learning courses. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 12,2, 107-113. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ 09596110010307369
  17. Khan, B. H., 2001.Web-based training: An introduction. In B.H. Kahn (Ed.) Web-based Training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Educational Technology Publications.
  18. Leidner, D.E. and Jarvenpaa, S.L., 1995. The Use of Information Technology to Enhance Management School Education: A Theoretical View. MlS Quarterly. 19, 3, 265-291.
  19. Lim B., Hong, K. S., and Tan, K. W., 2008. Acceptance of e-learning among distance learners: A Malaysian perspective, In Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings ascilite Melbourne 2008.
  20. Normark, O. R., and Cetindamar, D., 2005. e-Learning in a competitive firm setting. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42, 4, 325-335. DOI= 10.1080/14703290500062581.
  21. Poon, W.C., Low, L.T., and Yong, G. F., 2004.A study of Web-based learning (WBL) environment in Malaysia. The International Journal of Educational Management, 18, 6, 374-385.
  22. Romero, C., Sebastian, V., and Garcia, E., 2008.Data Mining in course management systems: Moodle case study and tutorial”. Computers and Education, Vol. 51, No.1, pp. 368-384.
  23. Sela, E. and Sivan, Y., 2009. Enterprise e-Learning Success Factors: An Analysis of Practitioners' Perspective (with a Downturn Addendum). Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Learning and Learning Objects. 5, 1, 335-343.
  24. Selim, H.M., 2007. Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers and Education.49, 2, 396-413. DOI= 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004.
  25. Siemens, G., 2004.Categories of eLearning. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/elearning categories.htm.
  26. Soong, B. M. H., Chan, H. C., Chua, B. C., and Loh, K. F., 2001. Critical success factors for on-line course resources. Computers and Education, 36, 2, 101-120. DOI= 10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00044-0
  27. Urdan, T. A., and Weggen, C. C., 2000. Corporate elearning: exploring a new frontier. W.R. Hambrecht & Co.
  28. Volery, T. and Lord, D., 2000. Critical Success Factors in Online Education, The International Journal of Educational Management. 14, 5, 216-223. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513540010344731.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Valsamidis S., Kazanidis I., Aggelidis V., Kontogiannis S. and Karakos A. (2016). Critical Success Factors for the of Acceptance and Use of an LMS - The Case of e-CLASS . In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-179-3, pages 331-338. DOI: 10.5220/0005795803310338


in Bibtex Style

@conference{csedu16,
author={Stavros Valsamidis and Ioannis Kazanidis and Vasilios Aggelidis and Sotirios Kontogiannis and Alexandros Karakos},
title={Critical Success Factors for the of Acceptance and Use of an LMS - The Case of e-CLASS},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,},
year={2016},
pages={331-338},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005795803310338},
isbn={978-989-758-179-3},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,
TI - Critical Success Factors for the of Acceptance and Use of an LMS - The Case of e-CLASS
SN - 978-989-758-179-3
AU - Valsamidis S.
AU - Kazanidis I.
AU - Aggelidis V.
AU - Kontogiannis S.
AU - Karakos A.
PY - 2016
SP - 331
EP - 338
DO - 10.5220/0005795803310338