A Research Agenda on Visualizations in Information Systems Engineering

Jens Gulden, Dirk van der Linden, Banu Aysolmaz


Effectively using visualizations in socio-technical artifacts like information systems and software yields a number of challenges, such as ensuring that they allow for all necessary information to be captured, that visualizations can be efficiently and correctly read, and perhaps most important: that communication is fostered, leading rather to a shared understanding instead of misunderstandings and communication breakdowns. While over the last years many strides have been made to propose visualizations for specific purposes (such as modeling language notations, software interfaces, visual methods, and games), there has been less attention for frameworks and guidelines meant to support the people making such visualizations. When taking a closer look at the deficiencies in research on visualizations in information systems today, it turns out that especially a deeper understanding of the mental processes behind comprehending visualizations and the way humans are cognitively affected by visualizations, is required in order to gain advanced theoretic underpinnings for the creation and use of visualizations in information systems. In this paper we build towards a research agenda on visualization in information systems engineering by identifying a number of relevant requirements for research to address, of fundamental, methodical and tool nature.


  1. Barjis, J., Kolfschoten, G. L., and Verbraeck, A. (2009). Collaborative enterprise modeling. In Advances in enterprise engineering II, pages 50-62. Springer.
  2. Bertin, J. (1974). Gruyter, Berlin.
  3. Brown, R. et al. (2014). Augmenting and Assisting Model Elicitation Tasks with 3D Virtual World Context Metadata. In Meersman, R. et al., editors, On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2014 Conferences SE - 3, volume 8841 of LNCS, pages 39- 56. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  4. Buckl, S., Gulden, J., and Schweda, C. M. (2010). Supporting ad hoc analyses on enterprise models. In Klink, S. et al., editors, Proceedings of the EMISA2010 Workshop, number 172 in Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), Bonn. Gesellschaft fuer Informatik.
  5. Caire, P., Genon, N., Heymans, P., and Moody, D. L. (2013). Visual notation design 2.0: Towards user comprehensible requirements engineering notations.
  6. Cairo, A. (2012). The Functional Art: An introduction to information graphics and visualization. Voices That Matter. Pearson Education.
  7. Chen, C. (2010). Information visualization. Springer, London.
  8. Cybulski, J. L., Keller, S., Nguyen, L., and Saundage, D. (2015). Creative problem solving in digital space using visual analytics. Computers in Human Behavior, 42.
  9. Figl, K. and Recker, J. (2014). Exploring cognitive style and task-specific preferences for process representations. Requirements Engineering, pages 1-23.
  10. Fill, H.-G. (2009). Visualization for Semantic Information Systems. Springer, Wiesbaden. p. 218.
  11. Fodor, J. A. (1998). Concepts: Where cognitive science went wrong. Clarendon Press.
  12. Gulden, J. (2010). Patterns as abstractions of spatial axes. In Bottoni, P., Guerra, E., and Lara, J. d., editors, Proceedings of the First Workshop Visual Formalisms for Patterns 2009 (VFfP'09), volume 25, page 12.
  13. Gulden, J. (2014). Towards a generalized notion of audio as part of the concrete syntax of business process modeling languages. In Ross Brown, Simone Kriglstein, S. R.-M., editor, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Theory and Applications of Process Visualization (TaProViz'14), Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer.
  14. Gulden, J. (2015). A description framework for data visualizations in enterprise information systems. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2015) in Adelaide, Australia, 2015-09-22 - 2015-09- 25. IEEE Xplore.
  15. Gulden, J. and Attfield, S. (2015). Business process models for visually navigating process execution data. In Ross Brown, Simone Kriglstein, S. R.-M., editor, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Theory and Applications of Process Visualization (TaProViz'15) on the conference Business Process Modeling (BPM 2015) in Innsbruck, 2015-08-31, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  16. Gulden, J. and Reijers, H. A. (2015). Toward advanced visualization techniques for conceptual modeling. In Grabis, J. and Sandkuhl, K., editors, Proceedings of the CAiSE Forum 2015 Stockholm, Sweden, June 8- 12, 2015, CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR.
  17. Izquierdo, J. L. C. and Cabot, J. (2013). Enabling the collaborative definition of dsmls. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pages 272-287. Springer.
  18. Jalali, S. and Wohlin, C. (2012). Systematic literature studies: database searches vs. backward snowballing. In Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering and measurement, pages 29-38. ACM.
  19. Johnson, J. (2014). Designing with the Mind in Mind, Second Edition: Simple Guide to Understanding User Interface Design Guidelines. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 2nd edition.
  20. Kelly, S. and Tolvanen, J.-P. (2008). Domain Specific Modeling: enabling full code-generation. Wiley.
  21. Kirk, A. (2012). Data Visualization: a successful design process. Packt Publishing, Birmingham.
  22. Mezhoudi, N., Perez Medina, J. L., Khaddam, I., Vanderdonckt, J., et al. (2015). Towards a conceptual model for uis context-aware adaptation. In 2nd World Congress on Computer Applications and Information Systems WCCAIS'2015.
  23. Moody, D. L. (2009). The ”Physics” of Notations: Towards a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 35(5):756-778.
  24. Petre, M. and Green, T. R. G. (1993). Learning to read graphics: Some evidence that 'seeing' an information display is an acquired skill. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 4(1):55-70.
  25. Recker, J. (2015). Research on conceptual modelling: less known knowns and more unknown unknowns, please. In Proceedings of the 11th Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling, volume 165, pages 3-8. Australian Computer Society.
  26. Recker, J. and Dreiling, A. (2007). Does it matter which process modelling language we teach or use? an experimental study on understanding process modelling languages without formal education. ACIS 2007 Proceedings, page 38.
  27. Reijers, H. A. and Mendling, J. (2011). A Study Into the Factors That Influence the Understandability of Business Process Models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 41(3):449-462.
  28. Rensink, R. A. (2014). On the prospects for a science of visualization. In Handbook of Human Centric Visualization, pages 147-175. Springer.
  29. Rouet, J.-F., Potelle, H., and Goumi, A. (2005). The role of content representations in hypermedia learning: Effects of task and learner variables. In Knowledge and Information Visualization, pages 343-354. Springer.
  30. Saffer, D. (2009). Designing for Interaction: Creating Innovative Applications and Devices. New Riders Publishing, Thousand Oaks, 2nd edition.
  31. Spence, R. (2007). Information Visualization (2nd edition). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
  32. Stahl, T., Voelter, M., and Czarnecki, K. (2006). ModelDriven Software Development: Technology, Engineering, Management. John Wiley & Sons.
  33. Tufte, E. R. (1990). Envisioning Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, Connecticut.
  34. van der Linden, D. (2015). An argument for more usercentric analysis of modeling languages' visual notation quality. In Persson, A. and Stirna, J., editors, Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops, volume 215 of Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, pages 114-120. Springer International Publishing.
  35. van der Linden, D. and Hadar, I. (2015). Cognitive effectiveness of conceptual modeling languages: Examining professional modelers. In 5th IEEE International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE).
  36. van der Linden, D. and Hoppenbrouwers, S. (2012). Challenges of identifying communities with shared semantics in enterprise modeling. In The Practice of Enterprise Modeling, pages 160-171. Springer.
  37. van der Linden, D., Hoppenbrouwers, S., Lartseva, A., and Molnar, W. (2012). Beyond terminologies: Using psychometrics to validate shared ontologies. Applied Ontology, 7(4):471-487.
  38. van der Linden, D. and Proper, H. (2014). On the accommodation of conceptual distinctions in conceptual modeling languages. In Proceedings of Modellierung 2014 (MoK 2014), volume 225 of Lecture Notes in Informatics.
  39. van der Linden, D. and Proper, H. A. (2014). Category structure of language types common to conceptual modeling languages. In Bider, Ilia et al., editor, Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling, volume 175 of LNBIP, pages 317-331. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  40. Van Zee, M., Plataniotis, G., van der Linden, D., and Marosin, D. (2014). Formalizing enterprise architecture decision models using integrity constraints. In Business Informatics (CBI), 2014 IEEE 16th Conference on, volume 1, pages 143-150. IEEE.
  41. Vande Moere, A. and Purchase, H. (2011). On the role of design in information visualization. Information Visualization, 10(4):356-371.
  42. Vanderdonckt, J. (2005). A MDA-Compliant Environment for Developing User Interfaces of Information Systems. In Pastor, O. and Falca˜o e Cunha, J., editors, Advanced Information Systems Engineering SE - 2, volume 3520 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 16-31. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  43. Wang, W., Indulska, M., and Sadiq, S. (2014). Integrated modelling of business process models and business rules: a research agenda. In 25th Australasian Conference on Information Systems.
  44. Wieringa, R. and Heerkens, J. (2006). The methodological soundness of requirements engineering papers: a conceptual framework and two case studies. Requirements engineering, 11(4):295-307.
  45. Wohlin, C. (2014). Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, page 38. ACM.
  46. Wong, W. et al. (2011). Invisque: Intuitive information exploration through interactive visualization. In CHI 7811 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 7811, pages 311-316, New York, NY, USA. ACM.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Gulden J., van der Linden D. and Aysolmaz B. (2016). A Research Agenda on Visualizations in Information Systems Engineering . In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Software Approaches to Software Engineering - Volume 1: ENASE, ISBN 978-989-758-189-2, pages 234-240. DOI: 10.5220/0005898702340240

in Bibtex Style

author={Jens Gulden and Dirk van der Linden and Banu Aysolmaz},
title={A Research Agenda on Visualizations in Information Systems Engineering},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Software Approaches to Software Engineering - Volume 1: ENASE,},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Software Approaches to Software Engineering - Volume 1: ENASE,
TI - A Research Agenda on Visualizations in Information Systems Engineering
SN - 978-989-758-189-2
AU - Gulden J.
AU - van der Linden D.
AU - Aysolmaz B.
PY - 2016
SP - 234
EP - 240
DO - 10.5220/0005898702340240