Anaís: A Conceptual Framework for Blended Active Learning in Healthcare

Adriano Araujo Santos, José Antão Beltrão Moura, Joseana Macêdo Fechine Regis de Araújo, Marcelo Alves de Barros

Abstract

The guarantee of the right to quality education is a fundamental principle for policy and management education. In addition to the organizational processes and regulation, as well as for citizenship, currently the student satisfaction plays a key role for the adequacy of actual courses and the needs of the educational community who depend on them. This way, interest on active methodologies has intensified with the emergence of new strategies that may favour the autonomy of students. Active Learning (AL) becomes an important strategy in healthcare to the extent that theory and practice go hand in hand in the training of health experts. This paper proposes a conceptual framework (Anaís) for active learning in healthcare studies and summarizes a qualitative research with healthcare experts and students on the feasibility and applicability of Anaís and its potentially positive results. Statistical tests and descriptive analysis of the collected data indicate Anaís could indeed bring a contribution to the healthcare area in terms of benefits to use it as an AL tool for professional training of physicians and other healthcare professionals and specialists.

References

  1. Arano-Ocuaman, J., 2010., Differences in student knowledge and perception of learning experiences among non-traditional students in blended and faceto-face classroom delivery. University of MissouriSaint Louis, USA.
  2. Barros, M, Moura, A, Borgman, L., Terton, U.:Blended Learning in Multi-disciplinary Classrooms - Experiments in a Lecture about Numerical Analysis. CSEDU (2) 2015: 196-204.
  3. Bersin, J., 2004., The Blended Learning Book: BestPractices, Proven Methodologies, and Lessons Learned. John Wiley & Sons.
  4. Bonwell, C., & Eison, J. 1991. Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). Washington, DC: George Washington University. Abstract online at http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed340272 .html.
  5. Cayley WE. 2011. Effective clinical education: strategies for teaching medical students and residents in the office. WMJ. 2011;110:178-1.c.
  6. CSEDU 2011, Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Supported Education [online]. [Accessed 15 October 2014]. Available from: http://pubs.iids.org/index.php/publications/show/1814.
  7. De Jong, N. et. al. 2014. Blended learning in health education: three case studies.Perspect Med Educ 3:278-288. DOI 10.1007/s40037-014-0108-1.
  8. Drysdale, J.S., Graham, C.R., Spring, K.J., and Halverson, L.R., 2013., An analysis of research trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning. Internet and Higher Education, 17., pp. 90-100.
  9. ElDin, Y. K. Z. 2014. Implementing Interactive Nursing Administrationlectures and identifying its influence on students' learning gains. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice. Vol. 4, No. 5.
  10. Farias, P. A. M. de, et al. 2015. Active Learning in Health Education: Historic Background and Applications. Revista brasileira de educação médica.
  11. Hsu, C., Sandford, B. A. 2007. The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. Vol 12, No 10.
  12. Mitre, S. M. et. al. 2008. Active teaching-learning methodologies in health education: current debates. Ciênc. saúde coletiva vol.13 suppl.2 Rio de Janeiro Dec.
  13. Moore, J. 2005. Is Higher Education Ready for Transformative Learning? A Question Explored in the Study of Sustainability. Journal of Transformative Education. Vol. 3: 76-91.
  14. Mubuuke, A. G. Louw, A. J. N. and Schalkwyk, S. V. 2016. Utilizing students' experiences and opinions of feedback during problem based learning tutorials to develop a facilitator feedback guide: an exploratory qualitative study. BMC Medical Education.16:6. DOI 10.1186/s12909-015-0507-y.
  15. Nilsson, M. S. et. al. 2010. Pedagogical strategies used in clinical medical education: an observational study. BMC Medical Education.
  16. Nonaka, I. Takeuchi, H.. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, 1995.
  17. O'Sullivan DW and Copper CL. Evaluating active learning. 2003. A New Initiative for a General Chemistry Curriculum. Journal of College Science Teaching. 32(7): 448-52.
  18. Parmelee, Dean X. DeStephen, D. Borges, Nicole J. 2009. Medical Students' Attitudes about Team-Based Learning in a Pre-Clinical Curriculum. Med Educ Online [serial online].14:1 doi;10.3885/ meo.2009.Res00280. Available from http://www.meded-online.org.
  19. Ramsden, P. 1984. The context of learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell & N. Entwistle (Eds.) The experience of learning (pp. 144-164). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
  20. Theexperience of learning (pp. 144-164). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
  21. Think Aloud. [Accessed 10 January 2016]. Available from:http://www.nngroup.com/articles/thinking-aloudthe-1-usability-tool/.
  22. Santos A. A, Moura J. A, Araújo J. M. de. 2015.A Conceptual Framework for Decision-making Support in Uncertainty- and Risk-based Diagnosis of Rare Clinical Cases by Specialist Physicians. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. Volume 216: MEDINFO 2015: eHealth-enabled Health.
  23. Souza, C. da S. Iglesias, A. G. Pazin-Filho, A. 2014. New approaches to traditional learning - general aspects. Medicina (Ribeirão Preto);47(3): 284-92.
  24. Wang, Q. et. al. 2016. Developing an integrated framework of problem-based learning and coaching psychology for medical education: a participatory research. BMC Medical Education. 16:2. DOI 10.1186/s12909-015-0516-x.
  25. Williams, J. Chinn, S. J. 2009. Using Web 2.0 to Support the Active Learning Experience. Journal of Information Systems Education, Vol. 20.
  26. Zaher, E. Ratnapalan, S. 2012. Practice-based small group learning programs. Can Fam Physician;58:637-42.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Araujo Santos A., Beltrão Moura J., Regis de Araújo J. and Alves de Barros M. (2016). Anaís: A Conceptual Framework for Blended Active Learning in Healthcare . In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-179-3, pages 199-206. DOI: 10.5220/0005920901990206


in Bibtex Style

@conference{csedu16,
author={Adriano Araujo Santos and José Antão Beltrão Moura and Joseana Macêdo Fechine Regis de Araújo and Marcelo Alves de Barros},
title={Anaís: A Conceptual Framework for Blended Active Learning in Healthcare},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,},
year={2016},
pages={199-206},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005920901990206},
isbn={978-989-758-179-3},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,
TI - Anaís: A Conceptual Framework for Blended Active Learning in Healthcare
SN - 978-989-758-179-3
AU - Araujo Santos A.
AU - Beltrão Moura J.
AU - Regis de Araújo J.
AU - Alves de Barros M.
PY - 2016
SP - 199
EP - 206
DO - 10.5220/0005920901990206