Pro-Innovative Orientation of Polish Social Enterprises: The Empirical Perspective

Agata Sudolska, Monika Chodorek

Abstract

Contemporary times require an entrepreneurial approach to social problems. As the consequence social enterprises have emerged as a new type of organization which despite its non-profit character is treated as a fully entrepreneurial organization. As social enterprises adopt business principles while providing social goods or services, it has to develop an orientation that enables not only to survive, but also to compete in the contemporary environment. The paper is an attempt to contribute to the research in the field of social enterprises activities by examining their attitudes towards innovations. The main purpose of the paper is an attempt to assess pro-innovative orientation of Polish social enterprises. The paper addresses two tasks. The first part of the paper provides short theoretical overview of the idea and nature of social enterprise. As the theoretical analysis presented in the paper is exemplified with the empirical study, the second part of the paper presents the research findings which indicate the manifestations of social enterprises pro-innovative orientation. Based on the conducted research, we attempt to identify how social enterprises understand innovations, what kind of innovations they introduce. Finally, we attempt to connect the fact of creating innovations with pro-innovative behaviors of social enterprise employees.

References

  1. Akinyemi J.O., Dilyard, J., Anderson, D., Schroeder, K.,http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/egms/docs/2013/ict/i nnovation-technology-social-enterprises.pdf; accessed 08.05.2016.
  2. Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., Sambrook, S., Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation, Management Decision. 47 (8), 1323-1339.
  3. Bessant J., Tidd J. 2011. Innovation and entrepreneurship, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester.
  4. Damanpour, F. 1996. Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing multiple contingency models, Management Science, 42 (5), 693-716.
  5. De Dreu, C.K.W. 2006. When Too Little or Too Much Hurts: Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship Between Task Conflict and Innovation in Teams. Journal of Management, 32 (1), 83-107.
  6. Defourny, J., Nyssens, M. 2008. Social enterprise in Europe: recent trends and developments, Social Enterprise Journal, 4 (3), 202-228.
  7. Defourny, J., Nyssens, M. 2012. The EMES approach of social enterprise in a comparative perspective, EMES European Research Network, http://emes.net/content/ uploads/publications/EMES-WP-12-03_DefournyNyssens.pdf, accessed 20.04.2016.
  8. Dess, G.G., Lumpkin, G.T. 2005. The Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Stimulating Effective Corporate Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Executive, 19 (1), 147-156.
  9. Ekvall, G. 1996. Organizational climate for creativity and innovation, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 105-123.
  10. Groot, A., Dankbaar, B. 2014. Does Social Innovation Require Social Entrepreneurship?, Technology Innovation Management Review, December, 17-26.
  11. Hunter, S.T., Bedell, K.E., Mumford, M.D. 2007. Climate for Creativity: A Quantitative Review, Creativity Research Journal, 19, 69-90.
  12. Isaken, S.G., Lauer, K.J., Ekval, G., Britz, A. 2000-2001. Perceptions of the Best and Worst Climates for Creativity: Preliminary Validation Evidence for Situational Outlook Questionnaire, Creativity Research Journal 13 (2), 171-184.
  13. Isaken, S.G., Lauer, K.J. 2002. The climate for creativity and change in teams, Creativity and Innovation Management, 11, 74-86.
  14. Jedrych E. 2013, Inwestowanie w innowacje spoleczne w organizacjach gospodarczych, PWN, Warszawa.
  15. Kaplan, J.M., Warren A.C. 2010. Patterns of Entrepreneurship Management, Jon Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey.
  16. Loewe, P., Dominiquini, J. 2006. Overcoming the barriers to effective innovation, Strategy and Leadership, 34 (1), 24-31.
  17. Nichols, A., Cho, A.H. 2006. Social Entrepreneurship: The Structuration of a Field. In Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change, Nichols, A. (Ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  18. Osborne, S.P., Flynn, N. 1997. Managing the Innovation Capacity of Voluntary and Non-Profit Organizations in the Provision of Public Services, Public Money & Management, October-December, 31-39.
  19. Oslo Manual. The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. 2005. OECD, 3rd Edition.
  20. Santos, F. M. 2012. A Positive Theory on Social Entrepreneurship, Journal of Business Ethics, 111 (3), 335-351.
  21. Thomson J., Doherty B. 2006. The diverse world of social enterprises. A collection of social enterprises stories, International Journal of Social Economics, 33 (5/6), 361-375.
  22. Weerawardena, J., Sullivan Mort G., 2012; Competitive Strategy in Socially Entrepreneurial Nonprofit Organizations: Innovation and Differentiation, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 31(1), Spring, 91-101.
  23. West, M.A., Farr, J.L. 1990. Innovation at work. In West, M.A., Farr, J.L. (Eds.) Innovation and creativity at work, 3-13, Wiley, Chichester.
  24. Westal, A. 2007. How can innovation in social enterprise be understood, encouraged and enabled? A social enterprise think piece for the Office of the Third Sector, http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/socialeconomy/enterprises/index_en.htm, accessed 28.04.2016.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Sudolska A. and Chodorek M. (2016). Pro-Innovative Orientation of Polish Social Enterprises: The Empirical Perspective . In Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management - Volume 3: KMIS, (IC3K 2016) ISBN 978-989-758-203-5, pages 132-139. DOI: 10.5220/0006037901320139


in Bibtex Style

@conference{kmis16,
author={Agata Sudolska and Monika Chodorek},
title={Pro-Innovative Orientation of Polish Social Enterprises: The Empirical Perspective},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management - Volume 3: KMIS, (IC3K 2016)},
year={2016},
pages={132-139},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0006037901320139},
isbn={978-989-758-203-5},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management - Volume 3: KMIS, (IC3K 2016)
TI - Pro-Innovative Orientation of Polish Social Enterprises: The Empirical Perspective
SN - 978-989-758-203-5
AU - Sudolska A.
AU - Chodorek M.
PY - 2016
SP - 132
EP - 139
DO - 10.5220/0006037901320139