Dual-Priority Congestion Control Mechanism for Video Services - Real Network Tests of CVIHIS

Juha Vihervaara, Pekka Loula, Teemu Alapaholuoma

Abstract

Information can be shared effectively by using of videos. Therefore, it is no wonder that videos form most of the Internet traffic. For the efficient operation of the Internet, it is essential that these videos are shared with a proper and effective way. In our previous paper, we have already presented a congestion control mechanism for the proper transmission of videos. This mechanism can offer two priority levels for video. There is a low priority service where the bandwidth is given away to other connections after the load level of a network exceeds a certain level. Instead, the other priority level, a real-time mode, always wants its fair share of the bandwidth. In this study, we have tested the operation of this mechanism by doing real network tests.

References

  1. Cisco. 2015. Cisco visual networking index: forecast and methodology, 2014-2019, Retrieved 06.04.2016 from http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/serv ice-provider/ip-ngn-ip-next-generationnetwork/white_paper_c11-481360.html.
  2. Donkor F. 2010. The comparative instructional effectiveness of print-based instructional and videobased materials for teaching practical skills at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(1). Pages 96-115.
  3. Floyd S, Kohler E. 2003. Internet Research Needs Better Models. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 33, Issue 1. Pages 29-34.
  4. Floyd S, Handley M, Padhye J, Widmer J. 2008. “TCP Friendly Rate Control (TFRC): protocol specification”. IETF RFC5348. Retrieved 06.06.2016 from https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5348.txt.
  5. Fabian B, Goertz F, Kunz S, Muller S, Nitzsche M. 2010. Privately waiting-a usability analysis of the tor anonymity network. Sustainable e-Business Management. Pages 63-75.
  6. Ha S, Rhee I, Xu L. 2008. CUBIC: a new TCP-friendly high-speed TCP variant. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review - Research and developments in the Linux kernel. Vol. 42 Issue. Pages 64-74.
  7. Jansen S, McGregor A. 2006. Performance, validation and testing with the Network Simulation Cradle. MASCOTS 2006, 14th IEEE International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation. Pages 355-362.
  8. Kurose J, Ross K. 2012. Computer Networking: A TopDown Approach. 6th Edition, Pearson International Edition, 888 pages.
  9. Lakshmi G, Bindu C. 2011. A Queuing Model for Congestion Control and Reliable Data Transfer in Cable Access Networks. IJCSIT, International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, Vol. 2, Issue 4. Pages 1427-1433.
  10. Lundin H, Holmer S, Alvestrand H. 2012. “A Google congestion control algorithm for real-time communication on the World Wide Web”. IETF informational Internet draft version 3. Retrieved 06.05.2016 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-alvestrandrtcweb-congestion-03.
  11. Meddeb A. 2010. "Internet QoS: Pieces of the Puzzle". IEEE Communication. Magazine, Vol. 48, Issue 2. Pages 86-94.
  12. NS-2. 2011. A collaboration between researchers at UC Berkeley, LBL, USC/ISI, and Xerox PARC. 2013. NS2 Manual. Retrieved 06.10.2016 http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/doc/index.html.
  13. Pandey A, Patni N, Singh M, Sood A, Singhd G . 2010. YouTube As a Source of Information on the H1N1 Influenza Pandemic. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol 38, Issue 3. Pages 1-3.
  14. Shalunov S, Hazel G, Iyengar J, Kuehlewind M. 2012. “Low Extra Delay Background Transport (LEDBAT)”. IETF RFC6817. Retrieved 06.06.2016 from https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6817.
  15. Singh K, Yadav R, Manjul M, Dhir R. 2008. Bandwidth Delay Quality Parameter Based Multicast Congestion Control. IEEE ADCOM 2008, 16th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communications. Pages 399-405.
  16. tc. 2016. tc(8) - Linux manual page. Retrieved 06.06.2016 from http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/tc.8.html.
  17. Vihervaara J, Loula P. 2015. Dual-Mode Congestion Control Mechanism for Video Service. ICIMT 2015, 7th International Conference on Information and Multimedia Technology. Pages 50-56.
  18. Widmer H, Denda R, Mauve M. 2001. A Survey on TCPFriendly Congestion Control. IEEE Network, Vol. 15, Issue 3. Pages 28-37.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Vihervaara J., Loula P. and Alapaholuoma T. (2016). Dual-Priority Congestion Control Mechanism for Video Services - Real Network Tests of CVIHIS . In Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management - Volume 3: KMIS, (IC3K 2016) ISBN 978-989-758-203-5, pages 51-59. DOI: 10.5220/0006049800510059


in Bibtex Style

@conference{kmis16,
author={Juha Vihervaara and Pekka Loula and Teemu Alapaholuoma},
title={Dual-Priority Congestion Control Mechanism for Video Services - Real Network Tests of CVIHIS},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management - Volume 3: KMIS, (IC3K 2016)},
year={2016},
pages={51-59},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0006049800510059},
isbn={978-989-758-203-5},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management - Volume 3: KMIS, (IC3K 2016)
TI - Dual-Priority Congestion Control Mechanism for Video Services - Real Network Tests of CVIHIS
SN - 978-989-758-203-5
AU - Vihervaara J.
AU - Loula P.
AU - Alapaholuoma T.
PY - 2016
SP - 51
EP - 59
DO - 10.5220/0006049800510059