A Multi-criteria Evaluation Framework for Selecting Sensitive Business Processes Modeling Formalism

Mariam Ben Hassen, Mohamed Turki, Faïez Gargouri


Sensitive business process (SBP) modeling has become primary concern for any successful organization to improve the management of their individual and collective crucial knowledge on which it is necessary to capitalize. This paper presents a multi-perspective evaluation framework for assessing the expressiveness of current widely used BPM formalisms, in order to select the most suitable for the SBP representation and improve the identification of crucial knowledge that is mobilized by these processes. Furthermore, the result of the evaluation led us to justify the choice of the better one positioned nowadays, the standard BPMN 2.0. Besides, we have illustrated the practical applicability of this notation on a medical process in the context of the association of protection of the motor disabled people of Sfax-Tunisia (ASHMS).


  1. Abecker,A., (2008). DECOR Consortium: DECORDelivery of Context- Sensitive Organizational Knowledge. E-Work and E-Commerce. IOS Press, Amsterdam.
  2. Arbeitsbericht, (2009) KMDL® v2.2 (2009). Available at http://www. kmdl.de/
  3. ARIS Expert Paper. (2007) Business Process Design as the Basis for Compliance Management, Enterprise Architecture and Business Rules.
  4. Ben Hassen, M., Turki, M., Gargouri, F., (2015a). Sensitive Business Process Modeling for Knowledge Management. In International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA'2015). Valencia-Spain. 2015.
  5. Ben Hassen, M., Turki, M., Gargouri, F., (2015b). A Business Process Meta-model for Knowledge Identification based on a Core Ontology. International Symposiumon Business Modeling and Software Design (BMSD'2015).Milan, Italy. Selected best Papers. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Springer.
  6. Cabral, L., Norton, B., Domingue, J., (2009). The business process modelling ontology. In 4th InternationalWorkshop on Semantic Business Process Management (SBPM 2009). Workshop at ESWC' 09, Crete, June.
  7. Donadel, A.C., (2007). A method for representing knowledge-intensive processes. M.Sc. dissertation. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil.
  8. França, J.B.S., Netto, J.M., Barradas, R.G., Baião, F. A., Santoro, F. M., (2012). Towards Knowledge-Intensive Processes Representation. In International Workshop on Business Process Design. Estonia.
  9. Ghrab, S., Saad, I., Kassel, G., Gargouri, F., (2015). An ontological framework for improving the model of contribution degree of knowledge. In International Conference on Knowledge Management, Information and Knowledge Systems (KMIKS 2015), Tunisia, pp. 45-58.
  10. Gronau, N., Korf R., Müller C., (2005). KMDL-Capturing, Analyzing and Improving Knowledge-Intensive Business Processes. J. of Universal Computer Science, Vol. 11, 452-472.
  11. Grundstein, M., (2000). From capitalizing on Company Knowledge to Knowledge Management. In Knowledge Management, Classic and Contemporary Works by Daryl Morey, Mark Maybury, Bhavani Thuraisingham, Cambridge, Massachusetts. The MIT Press, Chapter 12, pp. 261-287.
  12. Heisig, P., (2006).The GPO-WM® method for the integration of knowledge management into business processes. In International Conference on Knowledge Management, Graz, Austria, pp. 331-337.
  13. Hildebrandt, T.T., Mukkamala, R.R., (2010). Declarative event-based workflow as distributed dynamic condition response graphs. In Programming Languages Approaches to Concurrency and Communication-cEntric Software, p.59-73, Cyprus.
  14. Korherr, B., List, B., (2006). A UML 2 profile for event driven process chains. In: Proceedings of the 1st IFIP International Conference on Research and Practical Issues of Enterprise Information Systems. Springer.
  15. Lin, FR., Yang, MC. and Pai, YH., (2002). A generic structure for business process modeling. Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 8. No.1, Emerald.
  16. List, B., Korherr, B., (2006). An evaluation of conceptual business process modelling languages. In ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC' 06). ACM Press, France
  17. Netto, J.M, Franca, J. B. S., Baião, F.A., Santoro, F. M., (2013). A notation for Knowledge-Intensive Processes. In IEEE 17th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD 2013), Vol.1, pp.1-6.
  18. Oliveira, F.F., (2009).Ontology Collaboration and its Applications. MSc Dissertation. Programa de PósGraduação em Informática, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil.
  19. OMG (2011a). Business Process Modeling and Notation (BPMN). Version 2.0. http://www.bpmn.org/
  20. OMG (2011b). Unified modeling language (UML). Version 2.0. http://www.uml.org/
  21. Papavassiliou, G., Mentzas, G., (2003). Knowledge modelling in weakly-structured business processes. J. Know. Manag. 7(2), 18-33.
  22. Prezel, V., Gavsevic, D., and Milanovic, M., (2010). “Representational Analysis of Business Process and Business Rule Languages. In Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, Annapolis, Maryland, USA, pp. 241-258.
  23. Schreiber, G., Akkermans, H., Anjewierden, A., Hoog, R., Shadbolt, N., De Velde, W.V., Wielinga, B., (2002). Knowledge Engineering and Management: The Common KADS Methedology. MIT Press, Cambridge
  24. Strohmaier,M.,Yu, E., Horkoff, J.,Aranda, J., Easterbook, S.,(2007). Analyzing knowledge transfer effectiveness an agent-oriented modeling approach. In Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii Int. Conference on System Sciences, USA.
  25. Söderström, E., Andersson, B., Johannesson, P., Perjons, E., Wangler, B., (2002). Towards a Framework for Comparing Process Modeling Languages, Advanced Information Systems Engineering.14th International Conference, CAiSE 2002. Toronto, Canada.
  26. Sultanow, E., Zhou, X., Gronau, N., Cox, S., (2012). Modeling of Processes, Systems and Knowledge: a Multi-Dimensional Comparison of 13 Chosen Methods. International Review on Computers and Software, 7(6), pp. 3309-3319.
  27. Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., Green, P., (2009). Business process modeling: a comparative analysis. Journal of the Association for Information, V (10), 333-363.
  28. Saad, I., Grundstein, M., Sabroux, C., (2009). Une méthode d'aide à l'identification des connaissances cruciales pour l'entreprise. Revue SIM, Vol 14, n° 3.
  29. Scheer, A.W., (2000). ARIS - Business Process Modeling. Springer.
  30. Schlenoff, C., Gruninger, M., Tissot, F., Valois, J., (2000). The process specification language overview and version 1.0 specification. http://www.mel.nist.gov/psl/
  31. Supulniece, I., Businska, L., Kirikova, M., (2010). Towards extending BPMN with the knowledge dimension. In BPMDS 2010 and EMMSAD 2010. LNBIP, vol. 50, pp. 69-81. Springer, Heidelberg.
  32. The IDS-Scheer website (2013). http://www.idsscheer.com/
  33. Turki, M., Saad, I., Gargouri, F., Kassel, G., (2014a). A Business Process Evaluation Methodology for Knowledge Management based on multi-criteria decision making approach. Information systems for knowledge management. ISBN:978-1-84821-664- 8,Wiley-ISTE.
  34. Turki, M., Kassel, G., Saad, I., Gargouri, F., (2014b). COOP: A Core Ontology of Organization's Processes for group decision making”. Journal of Decision Systems, 23(1) pp.55-68.
  35. Wand, Y., Weber R., (1990). An ontological model of an information system. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 16(11):1282-1292.
  36. Weidong, Z., Weihui, D., (2008). Integrated Modeling of Business Processes and Knowledge Flow Based on RAD. In International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling. Wuhan, China, p. 49-53.
  37. Woitsch, R., Karagiannis, D., (2005). Process Oriented Knowledge Management: A Service Based Approach. Journal of universal computer science 11(4), 565-588.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Ben Hassen M., Turki M. and Gargouri F. (2016). A Multi-criteria Evaluation Framework for Selecting Sensitive Business Processes Modeling Formalism . In Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design - Volume 1: BMSD, ISBN 978-989-758-190-8, pages 84-97. DOI: 10.5220/0006222500840097

in Bibtex Style

author={Mariam Ben Hassen and Mohamed Turki and Faïez Gargouri},
title={A Multi-criteria Evaluation Framework for Selecting Sensitive Business Processes Modeling Formalism},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design - Volume 1: BMSD,},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design - Volume 1: BMSD,
TI - A Multi-criteria Evaluation Framework for Selecting Sensitive Business Processes Modeling Formalism
SN - 978-989-758-190-8
AU - Ben Hassen M.
AU - Turki M.
AU - Gargouri F.
PY - 2016
SP - 84
EP - 97
DO - 10.5220/0006222500840097