Supporting Decision-making Activities in Multi-Surface Learning Environments

Lili Tong, Audrey Serna, Sébastien George, Aurélien Tabard

Abstract

Collaborative decision-making is one of the emphasized student skills required by educators from different domains including science, technology and society. Multi-surface environments (MSE) appear particularly well suited for such learning activities, with large shared surfaces dedicated to the overview of information and context awareness, while personal surfaces serve browsing and analytical purposes. In this study, we present the design of Pickit, a MSE tool supporting collaborative decision-making activities. We show how Pickit is used by four groups of high school students as part of a learning activity. We analyze students’ interactions with digital devices that are related to given phases of the decision making process. Our results show that MSE are particularly interesting for such learning activities as they enable to balance personal and group work. The introduction of personal devices (tablets) makes free riding more difficult, while enabling development of personal judgment. By using Pickit, students successfully made their decisions and meanwhile better knew about the decision-making process.

References

  1. Aikenhead, G. S. (1985). Collective decision making in the social context of science. Science Education, 69(4):453-475.
  2. Chokshi, A., Seyed, T., Marinho Rodrigues, F., and Maurer, F. (2014). eplan multi-surface: A multi-surface environment for emergency response planning exercises. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, ITS 7814, pages 219-228, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
  3. Clark, H. H. and Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. Perspectives on socially shared cognition, 13(1991):127-149.
  4. Deneubourg, J.-L. and Goss, S. (1989). Collective patterns and decision-making. Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 1(4):295-311.
  5. Dillenbourg, P. and Evans, M. (2011). Interactive tabletops in education. International Journal of ComputerSupported Collaborative Learning, 6(4):491-514.
  6. DiMicco, J. M., Pandolfo, A., and Bender, W. (2004). Influencing group participation with a shared display. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pages 614-623. ACM.
  7. Dourish, P. and Bellotti, V. (1992). Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, pages 107-114. ACM.
  8. Evagorou, M., Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., and Osborne, J. (2012). “Should we kill the grey squirrels?” A study exploring students' justifications and decisionmaking. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3):401-428.
  9. Grace, M. (2009). Developing high quality decisionmaking discussions about biological conservation in a normal classroom setting. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4):551-570.
  10. Gutwin, C. and Greenberg, S. (1998). Design for individuals, design for groups: tradeoffs between power and workspace awareness. In Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pages 207-216. ACM.
  11. Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., and Miller, M. (2011). Selfregulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance, 30:65-84.
  12. Häkkinen, P. and Hämäläinen, R. (2012). Shared and personal learning spaces: Challenges for pedagogical design. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(4):231- 236.
  13. Higgins, S., Mercier, E., Burd, L., and Joyce-Gibbons, A. (2012). Multi-touch tables and collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6):1041-1054.
  14. Hong, J.-L. and Chang, N.-K. (2004). Analysis of korean high school students' decision-making processes in solving a problem involving biological knowledge. Research in science education, 34(1):97-111.
  15. Hornecker, E., Marshall, P., Dalton, N. S., and Rogers, Y. (2008). Collaboration and interference: awareness with mice or touch input. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pages 167-176. ACM.
  16. Janis, I. L. and Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. Free Press.
  17. Judge, T. K., Pyla, P. S., Mccrickard, D. S., Harrison, S., and Hartson, H. R. (2008). Studying group decision making in affinity diagramming.
  18. Kharrufa, A., Leat, D., and Olivier, P. (2010). Digital mysteries: designing for learning at the tabletop. In ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, pages 197-206. ACM.
  19. Kraemer, K. L. and King, J. L. (1988). Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 20(2):115-146.
  20. Maldonado, H., Klemmer, S. R., and Pea, R. D. (2009). When is collaborating with friends a good idea? insights from design education. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Computer supported collaborative learning-Volume 1, pages 227-231. International Society of the Learning Sciences.
  21. McCrindle, C., Hornecker, E., Lingnau, A., and Rick, J. (2011). The design of t-vote: a tangible tabletop application supporting children's decision making. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pages 181-184. ACM.
  22. Ratcliffe, M. (1997). Pupil decision-making about socioscientific issues within the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2):167- 182.
  23. Roberto, M. A. (2009). The art of critical decision making. Teaching Company.
  24. Rogat, T. K. and Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2011). Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction, 29(4):375-415.
  25. Rogers, Y., Hazlewood, W., Blevis, E., and Lim, Y.-K. (2004). Finger talk: collaborative decision-making using talk and fingertip interaction around a tabletop display. In CHI'04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1271-1274. ACM.
  26. Rogers, Y. and Lindley, S. (2004). Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: which way is best? Interacting with Computers, 16(6):1133-1152.
  27. Seifert, J., Simeone, A., Schmidt, D., Holleis, P., Reinartz, C., Wagner, M., Gellersen, H., and Rukzio, E. (2012). Mobisurf: improving co-located collaboration through integrating mobile devices and interactive surfaces. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM international conference on Interactive tabletops and surfaces, pages 51-60. ACM.
  28. Seyed, T., Costa Sousa, M., Maurer, F., and Tang, A. (2013). Skyhunter: a multi-surface environment for supporting oil and gas exploration. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international conference on Interactive tabletops and surfaces, pages 15-22. ACM.
  29. Shen, C., Everitt, K., and Ryall, K. (2003). Ubitable: Impromptu face-to-face collaboration on horizontal interactive surfaces. In International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, pages 281-288. Springer.
  30. Siegel, M. A. (2006). High school students' decision making about sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 12(2):201-215.
  31. Sugimoto, M., Hosoi, K., and Hashizume, H. (2004). Caretta: A system for supporting face-to-face collaboration by integrating personal and shared spaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 7804, pages 41-48, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
  32. Uskola, A., Maguregi, G., and Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.-P. (2010). The use of criteria in argumentation and the construction of environmental concepts: A university case study. International Journal of Science Education, 32(17):2311-2333.
  33. Vauras, M., Iiskala, T., Kajamies, A., Kinnunen, R., and Lehtinen, E. (2003). Shared-regulation and motivation of collaborating peers: A case analysis. Psychologia, 46(1):19-37.
  34. Volet, S., Vauras, M., and Salonen, P. (2009). Self-and social regulation in learning contexts: An integrative perspective. Educational psychologist, 44(4):215- 226.
  35. Wallace, J. R., Scott, S. D., and MacGregor, C. G. (2013). Collaborative sensemaking on a digital tabletop and personal tablets: prioritization, comparisons, and tableaux. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 3345-3354. ACM.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Tong L., Serna A., George S. and Tabard A. (2017). Supporting Decision-making Activities in Multi-Surface Learning Environments . In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-239-4, pages 70-81. DOI: 10.5220/0006313200700081


in Bibtex Style

@conference{csedu17,
author={Lili Tong and Audrey Serna and Sébastien George and Aurélien Tabard},
title={Supporting Decision-making Activities in Multi-Surface Learning Environments},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,},
year={2017},
pages={70-81},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0006313200700081},
isbn={978-989-758-239-4},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,
TI - Supporting Decision-making Activities in Multi-Surface Learning Environments
SN - 978-989-758-239-4
AU - Tong L.
AU - Serna A.
AU - George S.
AU - Tabard A.
PY - 2017
SP - 70
EP - 81
DO - 10.5220/0006313200700081