The Quest for Underpinning Theory of Enterprise Architecture - General Systems Theory

Nestori Syynimaa

Abstract

Enterprise architecture originates from the 1980’s. It emerged among ICT practitioners to solve complex problems related to information systems. Currently EA is also utilised to solve business problems, although the focus is still in ICT and its alignment with business. EA can be defined as a description of the current and future states of the enterprise, and as a change between these states to meet stakeholder’s goals. Despite its popularity and 30 years of age, the literature review conducted on top information and management science journals revealed that EA is still lacking the sound theoretical foundation. In this conceptual paper, we propose General Systems Theory (GST) for underpinning theory of EA. GST allows us to see enterprises as systems of systems consisting of, for instance, social organisations, humans, information systems and computers. This explains why EA can be used to describe the enterprise and its components, and how to control them to execute the managed change. Implications to science and practice, and some directions for future research are also provided.

References

  1. ABS. (2010). Academic Journal Quality Guide. Version 4. URL: http://www.associationofbusinessschools.org/sites/def ault/files/Combined%20Journal%20Guide.pdf [Sep 21st 2014].
  2. AIS. (2011). Senior Scholars' Basket of Journals. URL: https://aisnet.org/?SeniorScholarBasket [Nov 24th 2016].
  3. Ashby, W. R. (1957). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.
  4. Bloomberg, J. 2014). Is Enterprise Architecture Completely Broken? Available from: http://www.forbes.com/sites/ jasonbloomberg/2014/07/11/is-enterprise-architecturecompletely-broken/].
  5. Boulding, K. E. (1956). General Systems Theory-The Skeleton of Science. Management Science, 2(3), 197- 208.
  6. Cannon, W. B. (1932). The Wisdom of the Body. New York: W W Norton & Company.
  7. Deming, W. E. (2000). The New Economics: for industry, government, education. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  8. Emery, F. E. (1972). Characteristics of Socio-Technical Systems. In: Davis, L. E. & Taylor, J. C. (eds.) Design of Jobs. Penguin Books.
  9. FEAPO (2013). The FEAPO enterprise architecture perspective initiative: A common perspective on enterprise architecture. Architecture and Governance Magazine, 9(4), 11-17.
  10. Gartner. (2013). IT Glossary: Enterprise Architecture (EA). URL: http://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/enterprisearchitecture-ea/ [Feb 21st 2013].
  11. Graves, T. (2012). The theory of enterprise-architecture. URL: http://weblog.tetradian.com/2012/09/16/thetheory-of-enterprise-architecture/ [Sep 29th 2015].
  12. Graves, T. (2015). Theory and metatheory in enterprisearchitecture. URL: http://weblog.tetradian.com/2015/ 01/19/theory-and-metatheory-in-entarch/ [Sep 29th 2015].
  13. Gregor, S. (2006). The Nature of Theory in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611-642.
  14. ISO/IEC/IEEE (2011). Systems and software engineering - Architecture description.
  15. Jensen-Waud, A. (2011). Processes of Sense-Making and Systems Thinking in Government Enterprise Architecture Planning. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 7(3), 8-18.
  16. Kien, S. S., Rosemann, M. & Yetton, P. (2015). Special Issue Editorial: The Critical Contribution of Enterprise Architecture to the Performance of Large Private and Public Organizations. MIS Quarterly Executive, 4(14), iii-iv.
  17. Kotusev, S. (2016). The History of Enterprise Architecture: An Evidence-Based Review. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 12(1), 29-37.
  18. Lapalme, J. & de Guerre, D. W. (2012). Can a ReDiscovery of Open Socio-Technical Systems Strengthen EA? Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 8(1).
  19. Lapalme, J. & deGuerre, D. (2013). An Open SocioTechnical Systems Approach to Enterprise Architecture. In: Gøtze, J. & Jensen-Waud, A. (eds.) Systems Volume 3. Beyond Alignment. Applying Systems Thinking in Architecting Enterprise. London: College Publications.
  20. Lapalme, J., Gerber, A., Van der Merwe, A., Zachman, J., Vries, M. D. & Hinkelmann, K. (2015). Exploring the future of enterprise architecture: A Zachman perspective. Computers in Industry.
  21. Lee, A. S. (2010). Retrospect and prospect: information systems research in the last and next 25 years. Journal of Information Technology, 25, 336-348.
  22. MIT CISR. (2016). Enterprise Architecture. Introduction. URL: http://cisr.mit.edu/research/research-overview/ classic-topics/enterprise-architecture/.
  23. Oxford Dictionaries. (2010). Oxford Dictionaries. April 2010. URL: http://oxforddictionaries.com/ [Nov 18th 2014].
  24. Proper, H. A. (2013). Enterprise Architecture. Informed steering of enterprises in motion. ICEIS 2013. Angers, France.
  25. Sidorova, A. & Kappelman, L. A. (2011). Better BusinessIT Alignment Through Enterprise Architecture: An Actor-Network Theory Perspective. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 7(1), 39-47.
  26. Syynimaa, N. (2015). Modeling the Dynamics of Enterprise Architecture Adoption Process. In: Hammoudi, S., Maciaszek, L., Teniente, E., Camp, O. & Cordeiro, J., eds. ICEIS 2015, LNBIP 241, 2015. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 577-594.
  27. The Open Group (2009). TOGAF Version 9. Zaltbommel, Netherlands: Van Haren Publishing.
  28. Trist, E. (1981). The evolution of socio-technical systems. Occasional paper, 2.
  29. Van't Wout, J., Waage, M., Hartman, H., Stahlecker, M. & Hofman, A. (2010). The Integrated Architecture Framework Explained: Why, What, How. Berlin: Springer.
  30. Von Bertalanffy, L. (1951). General System Theory: A New Approach to Unity of Science. Human Biology, 23, 303-361.
  31. Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. New York: George Braziller.
  32. Webster, J. & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 13-23.
  33. Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Control and communication in the animal and the machine. New York: Wiley.
  34. Zachman, J. (2015). Interview of John Zachman by Sunil Dutt Jha: What is the Role of the Enterprise Architect? URL: https://www.youtube.com/embed/dcpFEurhxbw.
  35. Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3).
  36. Zachman, J. A. (1997). Enterprise architecture: The issue of the century. Database Programming and Design, 10(3), 44-53.
  37. Zadeh, M. E., Millar, G. & Lewis, E. (2012). Reinterpreting the TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture Principles Using a Cybernetic Lens. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 8(2), 9-17.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Syynimaa N. (2017). The Quest for Underpinning Theory of Enterprise Architecture - General Systems Theory . In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-758-249-3, pages 400-408. DOI: 10.5220/0006314904000408


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis17,
author={Nestori Syynimaa},
title={The Quest for Underpinning Theory of Enterprise Architecture - General Systems Theory },
booktitle={Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2017},
pages={400-408},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0006314904000408},
isbn={978-989-758-249-3},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - The Quest for Underpinning Theory of Enterprise Architecture - General Systems Theory
SN - 978-989-758-249-3
AU - Syynimaa N.
PY - 2017
SP - 400
EP - 408
DO - 10.5220/0006314904000408